Trance Forum | Stats | Register | Search | Parties | Advertise | Login

There are 0 trance users currently browsing this page
Trance Forum » » Forum  DJing - Why aren't tracks more DJ-friendly?
← Prev Page
6 7 8 9 10 Next Page →
First Page Last Page
Share on facebook Share on twitter Share on StumbleUpon
Author

Why aren't tracks more DJ-friendly?

RK9
IsraTrance Junior Member
Started Topics :  21
Posts :  210
Posted : Feb 21, 2009 03:34
Quote:

On 2009-02-19 15:17, Colin OOOD wrote:
Psy/Goa trance started off from the point of view of tracks as complete musical pieces rather than mixing tools, and this still applies in many ways

In that case, why are DJs who don't beatmix looked down upon?
BrainLizzard


Started Topics :  1
Posts :  779
Posted : Feb 21, 2009 04:35
[/quote]

In that case, why are DJs who don't beatmix looked down upon?

[/quote]

That's an easily question, EGO....
          


"If You Always Think What You've Always Thought, You Will Always Feel What You've Always Felt"
RK9
IsraTrance Junior Member
Started Topics :  21
Posts :  210
Posted : Feb 22, 2009 05:04
Honestly I think DJs who don't mix are being more respectful of the producers.

The whole "keep the beat going" argument falls flat on its face when the tracks have parts without beats in the middle anyway. So just play the tracks end to end as close as you can, as long as it sounds good.

Non-stop beats are for ravers and cokeheads (disclaimer: I am a raver and on rare occasions a cokehead)
~d2~
Inactive User

Started Topics :  7
Posts :  751
Posted : Feb 22, 2009 08:04
Quote:

On 2009-02-22 05:04, RK9 wrote:
Honestly I think DJs who don't mix are being more respectful of the producers.

The whole "keep the beat going" argument falls flat on its face when the tracks have parts without beats in the middle anyway. So just play the tracks end to end as close as you can, as long as it sounds good.

Non-stop beats are for ravers and cokeheads (disclaimer: I am a raver and on rare occasions a cokehead)



Trance-dance as a meditation relies heavily upon repetitive beats. Too much stopping and starting will spoil that.

Thats with out any coke, k or MDMA
x-rayz
IsraTrance Junior Member

Started Topics :  11
Posts :  576
Posted : Feb 22, 2009 12:47
Quote:

On 2009-02-22 05:04, RK9 wrote:
So just play the tracks end to end as close as you can, as long as it sounds good.


I just hope ur joking cause that just aint right..
In the beggining goa used to be played on DATs, cause the dust in the woods would cover the record and tunrtables just couldnt be used.. Thats why artist like Astral projection dunno anything about beat-matching.. We also had forest parties and spin the music on normal rack cd players with no pitch and when they broke I pluged my 2 discmans to keep the music going and we all had a great time, nothing wrong with that..
But were 10 years from that now and since needles for turntables improved heavily u can easily mix on them under very heavy conditions.. So if we can, theres no reason not to beatmatch when its way better than mixing intros.. If people need a brake, theres climaxes and build ups in the track.. With beatmatching u create totally different tracks on the fly and u cant do that on discmans.. So why would we have fun we had 10 years ago when it can be so much better for us?           http://www.facebook.com/xrayzproductions
http://www.myspace.com/xrayzproductions
Dennis the menace
Moderator

Started Topics :  128
Posts :  2899
Posted : Feb 22, 2009 14:12
Quote:

On 2009-02-22 05:04, RK9 wrote:
Honestly I think DJs who don't mix are being more respectful of the producers.



I dont think youre booked to be respectful to anything but the dancefloor in the end
BrainLizzard


Started Topics :  1
Posts :  779
Posted : Feb 23, 2009 23:27
Quote:

On 2009-02-22 12:47, x-rayz wrote:
Quote:

On 2009-02-22 05:04, RK9 wrote:
So just play the tracks end to end as close as you can, as long as it sounds good.


I just hope ur joking cause that just aint right..
In the beggining goa used to be played on DATs, cause the dust in the woods would cover the record and tunrtables just couldnt be used.. Thats why artist like Astral projection dunno anything about beat-matching.. We also had forest parties and spin the music on normal rack cd players with no pitch and when they broke I pluged my 2 discmans to keep the music going and we all had a great time, nothing wrong with that..
But were 10 years from that now and since needles for turntables improved heavily u can easily mix on them under very heavy conditions.. So if we can, theres no reason not to beatmatch when its way better than mixing intros.. If people need a brake, theres climaxes and build ups in the track.. With beatmatching u create totally different tracks on the fly and u cant do that on discmans.. So why would we have fun we had 10 years ago when it can be so much better for us?




I don't think he was joking and there is nothing wrong with it.. since we are so advanced with our gear whens the over all standards going to catch up? .. They are still back in those times with more ego today..

Anyone have any Dats to loan out? I'll make a mix with them and show its not the gear.. You can beatmatch on Dats.. Its harder and you must know your music. Also, some DJ's went to Dat with more reasons than just needle issues, a dj-friendly track is more noticeable for sure..

if the artist write music for laptop Dj's, just to catch up with the gear, why are they so perfectible and stay so formulaic?. The machine can fix that on the fly and skills will become a thing of the past..
          


"If You Always Think What You've Always Thought, You Will Always Feel What You've Always Felt"
x-rayz
IsraTrance Junior Member

Started Topics :  11
Posts :  576
Posted : Feb 24, 2009 00:44
good DAT is a good thing to have..
U can beatmatch on tapes too..
but nothing beats the feel of vinyl..
its great that gear is developing so fast, cause ones who know will appreciate much more old school stuff           http://www.facebook.com/xrayzproductions
http://www.myspace.com/xrayzproductions
BrainLizzard


Started Topics :  1
Posts :  779
Posted : Feb 24, 2009 10:03
Quote:

On 2009-02-24 00:44, x-rayz wrote:

U can beatmatch on tapes too..





Sweeeeet, I don't hear to many people bringing those days up to much
          


"If You Always Think What You've Always Thought, You Will Always Feel What You've Always Felt"
x-rayz
IsraTrance Junior Member

Started Topics :  11
Posts :  576
Posted : Feb 24, 2009 12:51
Yeah, there are some individuals but those days are gone.. And serato saved at least fun of playing on records.. Well I dunno but maybe, in theory, if u record timecode on DAT or tape u could play it to with serato..
Used magnetophones are quite pricey..          http://www.facebook.com/xrayzproductions
http://www.myspace.com/xrayzproductions
Psynthex
IsraTrance Junior Member

Started Topics :  41
Posts :  677
Posted : Feb 24, 2009 13:51
This is a: Why aren't tracks more DJ-friendly? topic.. not a Serato or DATA one Please open another one, which is more suitable to your conversation.

Thanks..           Psynthex [ Vertikal Records ]
http://www.myspace.com/psynthex

Minniq [ Parked Below Records ]

Frequent Pill [ Ultimae Records ]
Dennis the menace
Moderator

Started Topics :  128
Posts :  2899
Posted : Feb 24, 2009 14:42
Why would anyone mix with dats or discmans when you have new technology no matter how friendly or not the tracks are? And how fun is it to play with tapes?

and btw, i dont think ppl played with dats in the past cuz of the dust in the woods, a better reason for that would be that it was easy to copy music and keep the quality like it is today with computers and internet. I dont think them hippies had a vinyl press in their backpocket...

Psynthex
IsraTrance Junior Member

Started Topics :  41
Posts :  677
Posted : Feb 24, 2009 15:06
For continual discussion about DATAs etc... please use this topic: http://forum.isratrance.com/vinyl-cd-data-software-mixing/

Thanks in advance

          Psynthex [ Vertikal Records ]
http://www.myspace.com/psynthex

Minniq [ Parked Below Records ]

Frequent Pill [ Ultimae Records ]
Machi


Started Topics :  5
Posts :  150
Posted : May 6, 2009 20:10
adding extra bars is stupid on the producer's part

also even that your improoved transition sounds quite good I don't think I would drop Plasmotek after Stage IV track - totally diffrent production and atmosphere, but it may just be me, cheers!           DJ Sets: http://metatrance.org/category/mixes/machi/
~Health: http://www.symmetrydirect.com/DJMACHI
FrodOhm
IsraTrance Junior Member

Started Topics :  32
Posts :  1018
Posted : May 8, 2009 10:59
Editing other peoples work to make it fit ones set, is a shortcut to the overcoming a challenge.
Not to mention that doing so without permission ....well... Need i say more?
Why beatmatch what is beatunmatchable anyways

Timing is the key, and guess what...
It can be done without beatmixing!
Trance Forum » » Forum  DJing - Why aren't tracks more DJ-friendly?
← Prev Page
6 7 8 9 10 Next Page →
First Page Last Page
Share on facebook Share on twitter Share on StumbleUpon


Copyright © 1997-2024 IsraTrance