| Author
|
So whats next?
|
Nectarios
Martian Arts
Started Topics :
187
Posts :
5292
Posted : Oct 15, 2011 13:49
|
I remember this tune. Although I like the main riff/bassline, the nitzo-kinda-melody completely ruined it for me. It still does.
Peace out.
 
http://soundcloud.com/martianarts |
|
|
|
goaren
IsraTrance Full Member
Started Topics :
60
Posts :
1151
Posted : Oct 15, 2011 14:24
|
matter of taste  i personally despise nitzhonot, but in this case, while having a melody which reminds nitzhonot (this track came out about 3-4 years before that god awful style popped up), i think its a good melody that tells a story also due to the fact that its combined with the riff you mentioned - try listening to this track in an outdoor party and see the response home listening makes you perceive the track differently (or maybe its just nostalgia/memories i have from good parties this track was played in) |
|
|
|
Nectarios
Martian Arts
Started Topics :
187
Posts :
5292
Posted : Oct 15, 2011 14:44
|
I first listened to this track in outdoor parties in Athens...I think it was 1996. Never bought the record or bothered to copy it on DAT tape.
Matter of taste indeed.
Peace out.
http://soundcloud.com/martianarts |
|
|
|
Beat Agency
IsraTrance Full Member
Started Topics :
53
Posts :
1752
Posted : Oct 15, 2011 16:25
|
|
I have seen this debate countless times yet I have not seen any real progression for a long time. If progression is to go back to what once was it's not really progression.
www.beatagency.dk |
|
|
|
Colin OOOD
OOOD/Voice of Cod
Started Topics :
95
Posts :
5380
Posted : Oct 15, 2011 19:15
|
|
goaren
IsraTrance Full Member
Started Topics :
60
Posts :
1151
Posted : Oct 15, 2011 22:10
|
"going to that level of trance that is right for your today"
for me the way the intro of the track is just ethereal, thinking of opening/closing a set with it
kristian - this topic is pretty much about the next thing, next doesnt necessarily mean progression (take fashion for example).
i personally dont like how most of trance music "progressed" from 2005/6-2010, so for me the next move was to go back to what i loved and grew up on, as it happened to several producers over the past few years - by that i dont mean only recycling music/styles of the past, but taking elements that the producer liked from the past times and integrate them into his own/new sound - pretty much in the vein of what dh said.
|
|
|
|
Maine Coon
IsraTrance Junior Member
Started Topics :
12
Posts :
1659
Posted : Oct 16, 2011 19:07
|
Quote:
|
On 2011-10-15 16:25, Beat Agency wrote:
I have seen this debate countless times yet I have not seen any real progression for a long time. If progression is to go back to what once was it's not really progression.
|
|
Going "back to what once was" works fine in chord progressions, doesn't it? 
Also let's not forget that "progressive" trance is just a pretentious version of 1980s' Eurodisco. You know, "You're my heart, you're my soul" and "I will make you feel alright, be my lady of the night" type of deal. 
So, see - progress can happen in a loop (or a spiral, more like it).
Anyway, who was talking about progress here?  |
|
|
|
Yidam
IsraTrance Full Member
Started Topics :
144
Posts :
3171
Posted : Oct 19, 2011 11:13
|
bizarre talk from a daydream:
Future music is not dependent on the industry anymore. It will now start structuring itself around performances. The era of genres are over!
The vibe of performances comes from the source of the inspiration and the attitude of the artist. Of course structure will still exist from the side of those who produce, trying to group similar acts together to create an event.
The grouping though will now have to be done by sound rather than genre.
The future of music is sound.
What is next is sound.
The producers of tomorrow are those who create their own sound.
In a way it is also how it's always been. We never remembered musicians, we only remembered those who produced their own unique sound.
|
|
|
|
