| Author
|
who came up with the term "full on" ?
|
traveller
IsraTrance Senior Member
Started Topics :
234
Posts :
3803
Posted : Sep 19, 2003 15:09
|
..the title says it all..
  "The dinosaurs became extinct because they didn't have a space program."
- Larry Niven |
|
|
|
Jeff
IsraTrance Junior Member
Started Topics :
13
Posts :
180
Posted : Sep 19, 2003 16:13
|
You're in a vocabulary mood at the moment traveller 
I guess it was used since the beginning to qualify a powerful dance track. The question is, when was it applied as a Psy subgenre ?
Expressions like "a real full-on album" "Just kickin, full on, pumping trance" can be found in 1996 reviews.
Then you had the compilation "Full on" released by Hom-mega in November 1997. Maybe that's the start for the subgenre, just guessing...
J. |
|
|
|
Mike A
Subra
Started Topics :
185
Posts :
3954
Posted : Sep 19, 2003 16:17
|
|
Hommega, Xerox & Freeman.
|
|
|
|
rippa
IsraTrance Full Member
Started Topics :
60
Posts :
231
Posted : Sep 19, 2003 17:24
|
I guess mike is right there , but the real fullon formula of the last few years i think Astrix invented (in the first alien project album). lets say end of 2000 start of 2001.
GMS has some part of it ofcourse , thier style from 2000+ not the older stuff , i guess since the nitzhotnot style died.
I'm The Superviz'a Can I Get The Taxi Numbah?! |
|
|
|
Wako Jako
IsraTrance Junior Member
Started Topics :
26
Posts :
1183
Posted : Sep 19, 2003 19:45
|
imo GMS started it all.
and they also made me realize what kind of psytrance i like best...
FULL ONNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN !
p.s. - with Cheeseballs.
SMILE ! and the whole world will smile right back at you ! |
|
|
|
Basilisk
IsraTrance Full Member
Started Topics :
168
Posts :
2984
Posted : Sep 19, 2003 20:42
|
|
Etnica released Starship 101 with the b-side 'Full On' in 1995. Koxbox released 'Fuel on' that same year. I'm fairly certain the term was already in use by then.
|
|
|
|
full_on
IsraTrance Team
Started Topics :
279
Posts :
5475
Posted : Sep 19, 2003 21:05
|
Nice thread, it enhances my self-knowledge... 
Respect!
.
...Be gentle with the earth...
...Dance like nobody's watching...
.
...I don't mind not going to Heaven, as long as they've got Coffee in Hell... |
|
|
|
full_lotus
IsraTrance Junior Member
Started Topics :
25
Posts :
562
Posted : Sep 20, 2003 14:03
|
|
nobody_3
Inactive User
Started Topics :
13
Posts :
1177
Posted : Sep 20, 2003 16:55
|
It's true that the term "Full On" was already known around 1994-95. But you can' really compare it to today's Full On music. Very few artists made that fast music (143-147) with so many layers of sounds. It was not before mid 1997 and early 1998 that Full On started to kick off for real.
Thanx (or should I say no thanx...LOL) to mainly the Israli acts, which I am sure I don't have to mention here, Full On became more popular and "grew" out of Israel.
|
|
|
|
kriz
Horrordelic Records
Started Topics :
25
Posts :
1247
Posted : Sep 20, 2003 17:32
|
|
Wako Jako
IsraTrance Junior Member
Started Topics :
26
Posts :
1183
Posted : Sep 20, 2003 19:44
|
Quote:
|
Thanx (or should I say no thanx...LOL) to mainly the Israli acts, which I am sure I don't have to mention here, Full On became more popular and "grew" out of Israel.
|
|
i agree.
imo also today israelis are the best full on.
or at least what i like best...
SMILE ! and the whole world will smile right back at you ! |
|
|
|
Ron Lyner
Ron Lyner
Started Topics :
21
Posts :
685
Posted : Sep 20, 2003 20:04
|
as i know
full on is the exactly opposite than minimal..
in minimal only few sounds play at the same time..
in full-on lots of sounds and effects at the same time. http://www.o-zen.com/art/ranal
-------------------------------------
You wanna dance?!...I know a tune...it´s called stick and CUT!!
V.L |
|
|
|
Wako Jako
IsraTrance Junior Member
Started Topics :
26
Posts :
1183
Posted : Sep 21, 2003 08:29
|
Ron this is not a minimal vs. full on thread.
you are in the wrong place.
i will ignore your comments.
SMILE ! and the whole world will smile right back at you ! |
|
|
|
Ron Lyner
Ron Lyner
Started Topics :
21
Posts :
685
Posted : Sep 21, 2003 15:59
|
is that better?
http://www.o-zen.com/art/ranal
-------------------------------------
You wanna dance?!...I know a tune...it´s called stick and CUT!!
V.L |
|
|
|
traveller
IsraTrance Senior Member
Started Topics :
234
Posts :
3803
Posted : Sep 21, 2003 16:09
|
what are you talkin' about? imo full on and minimal are pretty much the same thing.. only real difference is the bpm which tends to be higher in full on..
both full on and minimal are really quite umm.. minimal.. no real melodies.. no real variation.. just repeative drums and repeative basslines.. and umm.. cheesy samples..
slow down 156bpm full on track to 100bpm and it sounds exactly like any minimal track 
do the opposite to any minimal track and it sounds exactly like any gms track...
hell buy gms album and play it with half the tempo.. it might be the best minimal album you will ever own.. and twice as long.. "The dinosaurs became extinct because they didn't have a space program."
- Larry Niven |
|
|
|
