Trance Forum | Stats | Register | Search | Parties | Advertise | Login

There are 0 trance users currently browsing this page and 1 guest
Trance Forum » » Forum  Production & Music Making - The Mother of all Mastering thread
← Prev Page
9 10 11 12 13 Next Page →
First Page Last Page
Share on facebook Share on twitter Share on StumbleUpon
Author

The Mother of all Mastering thread

Nectarios
Martian Arts

Started Topics :  187
Posts :  5292
Posted : Sep 26, 2007 15:19
I do some rough home "mastering" before sending my tunes out to people to listen and play out. Simple EQ>compressor>adaptive limiter chain.
EQ is simply a linear phase high pass filter (I don't like EQing the mix, I simply sort everything out at the mixing stage) at around 35Hz, unless my fundamental note is a C, so I set it around 30Hz, compressor has a low ratio (like 1.5:1), soft knee, moderate attack, release and a low threshold so I get to "gell" the mix a bit.
Then the adaptive limiter takes care of the loudness. I don't look at gain reduction meters, just push the input at a setting, right before I hear too many limiting side effects. Works good enough for me.

Obviously I send an unprocessed version of the stereo file to the mastering house. There are far better monitors, acoustics, gear and most importantly, people, for the job at Heathmans.
Elad
Tsabeat/Sattel Battle

Started Topics :  158
Posts :  5306
Posted : Sep 27, 2007 00:56
for my opinion best way to record will be like this

get the input to the compressor as close to 0 as u can around -2 db will be ideal

adjust the compressor setting (wheather it can act as brickwall depend on the model) so the output is as close to 0 again

record on 32 bits , then dither to 16 bit.

          www.sattelbattle.com
http://yoavweinberg.weebly.com/
Andreh
Bash / Kernel Panic

Started Topics :  23
Posts :  690
Posted : Sep 28, 2007 16:58
I´ve got very nice results whit those advices and new concepts about home mastering for me, thankz a lot about the support folks!


          Bash's Home:
http://www.myspace.com/bashbr

Mind Tweakers Records:
http://www.mindtweakers.com
frambonas
IsraTrance Junior Member

Started Topics :  14
Posts :  166
Posted : Nov 13, 2007 17:45
Quote:

On 2007-09-27 00:56, Elad wrote:
for my opinion best way to record will be like this

get the input to the compressor as close to 0 as u can around -2 db will be ideal

adjust the compressor setting (wheather it can act as brickwall depend on the model) so the output is as close to 0 again

record on 32 bits , then dither to 16 bit.




hey,

do you mean dBu or dB full scale?
on analog mixers you can puch untill 0dB, but in you digital sequencer it's better to leave some headroom. (my opinion)
When i start projects i put everything on -9dB. To avoid any digital clipping, and then you leave more headroom for final mastering on compilation or the album.



le barde
Electrypnose

Started Topics :  32
Posts :  348
Posted : Dec 7, 2007 03:00
Quote:
When i start projects i put everything on -9dB. To avoid any digital clipping, and then you leave more headroom for final mastering on compilation or the album.



that's the way to do.
what tsabi said is for recording it seems. When you digitalize any signal... as much dB you use before 0, more you take advantage of the resolution per bits.
A little margin is needed to avoid digital distortion.           ____
so many knobs - so little time
Andreh
Bash / Kernel Panic

Started Topics :  23
Posts :  690
Posted : Dec 7, 2007 15:44
thats whats happening now, u can see in the wave form of the file, the space to the song take some air!           Bash's Home:
http://www.myspace.com/bashbr

Mind Tweakers Records:
http://www.mindtweakers.com
JUGGERNAUT
IsraTrance Junior Member

Started Topics :  18
Posts :  111
Posted : Jan 28, 2008 05:49
Im just curious, is it bad if none of the instrument traks are clipping but the master is and you just turn down the master fader how does this affect the overall mix?
JUGGERNAUT
IsraTrance Junior Member

Started Topics :  18
Posts :  111
Posted : Jan 28, 2008 05:52
Also, if my final mixdown is well below 0db and I attempt to have that mastered will the siganal to noise ratio be too high?

Any good ways to check the S to N ratio? There isnt much in digital recording right?
WillianDiesel


Started Topics :  3
Posts :  23
Posted : Feb 15, 2008 22:46
for juggernaut:

If you turn down the master fader the volume will turn down, it wont affect anything else than this.

About the S/N ratio i think you should not care to this as today we have 110, 120 db of SN on the converters and 24 bits of resolution, you dont need to reach high levels to capture all the information of the sound.

As clipping goes my tip is pay attention on the kick, if the sound is clipping because of the kick there is no problem on limiting it as you prefer.

www.myspace.com/williandiesel
JUGGERNAUT
IsraTrance Junior Member

Started Topics :  18
Posts :  111
Posted : Feb 20, 2008 07:56
Thanks, Willian!
frambonas
IsraTrance Junior Member

Started Topics :  14
Posts :  166
Posted : Feb 24, 2008 12:49
Quote:

On 2008-01-28 05:52, JUGGERNAUT wrote:
Also, if my final mixdown is well below 0db and I attempt to have that mastered will the siganal to noise ratio be too high?

Any good ways to check the S to N ratio? There isnt much in digital recording right?



If you only use digital sounds, nothing recorded with microphones, it won't effect the noise ratio, becouse there will be no noise

But i never put the master fader down, if it clips, i make a mixdown when the track is done, from all the seperate tracks, then you can give them all some less dB when you import them.
But it's not bad to do this with the master fader, I just like to do it with the seperate tracks.
ZenMind
ZenMind

Started Topics :  40
Posts :  251
Posted : Feb 27, 2008 16:31
Could someone advise me in a good (afordable) compressor and EQ?           -------------d(oO)b----------------

http://www.facebook.com/zenmind.music

http://soundcloud.com/zenmind
PoM
IsraTrance Full Member

Started Topics :  162
Posts :  8087
Posted : Feb 27, 2008 18:14
izotope ozone is aforable and very good.better it ll cost you a lot (for neutral not too much coloring plugins like algorithmix,plpareq,sonnox dynamics and limiter,psp... )
piXan
IsraTrance Full Member

Started Topics :  107
Posts :  807
Posted : Feb 29, 2008 18:09
anywhere care to explain whats the difference from Sonnox Oxford Inflator, to any normal limiter like waves L2? Does anyone use it (inflator) and in what part of the mastering chain u use it?           www.soundcloud.com/elektroakustica/sets/downtempo/
WillianDiesel


Started Topics :  3
Posts :  23
Posted : Mar 4, 2008 00:12
pixan:

- Inflator: Add harmonics to the sound material increasing the apparent loudness without raising too much the volume.
If you use it a litle is a good plug, if you use too much will distort the sound.

- L2 is a limiter, a limiter is like a compressor with an infinite ratio, when the sound amplitude passes from the threshould you set the limiter will compress the sound with a infinite ratio, for a matter of opinion i hate L2...

I sugest to use Inflator just before the limiter and after any other processigs.

www.myspace.com/williandiesel
Trance Forum » » Forum  Production & Music Making - The Mother of all Mastering thread
← Prev Page
9 10 11 12 13 Next Page →
First Page Last Page
Share on facebook Share on twitter Share on StumbleUpon


Copyright © 1997-2025 IsraTrance