Trance Forum | Stats | Register | Search | Parties | Advertise | Login

There are 0 trance users currently browsing this page
Trance Forum » » Forum  Trance - So what do you consider Full-On?
← Prev Page
1 2 3 4
First Page Last Page
Share on facebook Share on twitter Share on StumbleUpon
Author

So what do you consider Full-On?

Magox
IsraTrance Junior Member

Started Topics :  20
Posts :  2095
Posted : Apr 20, 2008 23:42
Fullon trance for me is about building a track up then explosion, usually in the mid 140's bpm. Production quality of the upper echelon artists usually have more clarity to the tracks, not as muddy, but at the same tolken, more predictable in it's build up to explosion. That's the best way i can describe it. Since no one else was able to give at least their interpretation of Full on trance is.            "On the path of spirituality, one ventures to vanquish one’s own faults rather than to judge others"
soulfood
IsraTrance Junior Member

Started Topics :  10
Posts :  875
Posted : Apr 21, 2008 00:35
Quote:

On 2008-04-20 23:42, Magox wrote:
Fullon trance for me is about building a track up then explosion, usually in the mid 140's bpm. Production quality of the upper echelon artists usually have more clarity to the tracks, not as muddy, but at the same tolken, more predictable in it's build up to explosion. That's the best way i can describe it. Since no one else was able to give at least their interpretation of Full on trance is.




That's weird... I thought a good few people gave an explanation of what "Full-on" trance is.
ocelot
ocelot

Started Topics :  94
Posts :  783
Posted : Apr 21, 2008 02:27
all electronic dance music is primitive pop shit reinventing wheels ignorantly due to no exposure to the musical theories and traditions of the world, and the fixed format of electronic dance music as invented by some computer engineer in 1986 on E
Elad
Tsabeat/Sattel Battle

Started Topics :  158
Posts :  5306
Posted : Apr 21, 2008 04:11
Quote:

On 2008-04-19 06:06, kalumet wrote:
Samothraki 2003, last afternoon, Tristan was playing, i was walking on that long pile of rocks between the beach and the dancefloor, and there was this old man, with very long dreadlocks, watching the crowd. As i reached him, he shook my hands, and said only this; 'full on!'. He didn't know me, just reported the situation... i know it sounds like a stupid romantic hippie story, but since that moment this expression 'full on' means that kind of experiences for me. so i think that many kinds of music can be full on.. most of the so called full on stuff is crap imo, i stopped listening to it in 2000, but i hear them on parties... israeli full on was nice until 'full on vol 3.' by hom-mega, but the cheesy stuff is simply not psychedelic. although there are great artists like Principles of Flight, Reality Grid, Evp, and you can hear some really good tunes on london squat parties, but if it's full on, for me the real things are the new Para Halu kind of music, and the suomi tunes. And of course many things from dark psy, which are not dark at all, but of course most of that genre is crap too..
Anyway, the two ultimate full on tracks for me are: Green Nuns of the Revolution - Ring of Fire, and Total Eclipse - Can't do that.
they called it goa-trance, for me it's full on

my two euros.





nice story
also in australia term full-on used on more then music to simply describe situation..
and yes i kind of felt also that texas faggot is more suitable for the term fullon as used in language then the cheesy music that is more conected with it today
btw GNOTR ring of fire is soooo classic for me also

but like i said before i think i will end it with 'psytrance' , it get hard to folow even just the names that keep swap faster then music (does prog turned its name to minimal officialy yet? )          www.sattelbattle.com
http://yoavweinberg.weebly.com/
Magox
IsraTrance Junior Member

Started Topics :  20
Posts :  2095
Posted : Apr 21, 2008 19:55
Quote:

On 2008-04-21 00:35, soulfood wrote:
Quote:

On 2008-04-20 23:42, Magox wrote:
Fullon trance for me is about building a track up then explosion, usually in the mid 140's bpm. Production quality of the upper echelon artists usually have more clarity to the tracks, not as muddy, but at the same tolken, more predictable in it's build up to explosion. That's the best way i can describe it. Since no one else was able to give at least their interpretation of Full on trance is.




That's weird... I thought a good few people gave an explanation of what "Full-on" trance is.



oh really....

who?            "On the path of spirituality, one ventures to vanquish one’s own faults rather than to judge others"
ocelot
ocelot

Started Topics :  94
Posts :  783
Posted : Apr 25, 2008 12:37
means boom chick music
kick hihat kick hihat
usually with low-volume but mid-frequency bassline doing some kinda funky blues scale thing.

sound on top can vary from sawtooth-wave with distortion melodies to scratchy pitch-modulated sassy thingies...

the main thing is to hear the hi hats and the crashes and make sure your mix is slamming. especially in the mids.
dont forget a sample from a major motion picture.
put it in the two breaks.

your first break is smaller but the second one should indicate all hell breaking loose and the end of the world.
then you bring in the track the same way it was before but with the extra melody or riff you were saving.
...
thats the genre definition anyway.
...


it used to be just an adjective.
meant "in your face"
or the opposite of minimal.



AumShantiAum
IsraTrance Junior Member

Started Topics :  27
Posts :  911
Posted : Apr 25, 2008 19:16
i still use it as an adjective
Btros
IsraTrance Junior Member

Started Topics :  11
Posts :  156
Posted : Apr 25, 2008 19:43
Quote:

On 2008-04-25 12:37, ocelot wrote:
means boom chick music
kick hihat kick hihat
usually with low-volume but mid-frequency bassline doing some kinda funky blues scale thing.

sound on top can vary from sawtooth-wave with distortion melodies to scratchy pitch-modulated sassy thingies...

the main thing is to hear the hi hats and the crashes and make sure your mix is slamming. especially in the mids.
dont forget a sample from a major motion picture.
put it in the two breaks.

your first break is smaller but the second one should indicate all hell breaking loose and the end of the world.
then you bring in the track the same way it was before but with the extra melody or riff you were saving.
...
thats the genre definition anyway.
...




That's a perfect description.
Trance Forum » » Forum  Trance - So what do you consider Full-On?
← Prev Page
1 2 3 4
First Page Last Page
Share on facebook Share on twitter Share on StumbleUpon


Copyright © 1997-2024 IsraTrance