| Author
|
Your best Vst Phasers
|
Geom3
IsraTrance Junior Member
Started Topics :
12
Posts :
479
Posted : Mar 17, 2013 14:51:45
|
.Phase Mistress
- there has to others that compete that share the same modulation capabilities
|
|
|
Grevinsky
IsraTrance Full Member
Started Topics :
75
Posts :
685
Posted : Mar 17, 2013 15:22
|
|
Nectarios
Martian Arts
Started Topics :
187
Posts :
5292
Posted : Mar 17, 2013 16:03
|
|
willsanquil
IsraTrance Full Member
Started Topics :
93
Posts :
2822
Posted : Mar 17, 2013 20:19
|
I have always liked the Uhbik-P phaser from U-he. Way less CPU useage than Phase Mistress and I get better results quicker personally though I'm sure that's because I've invested more time in learning the U-he one.
been especially liking the phaser on the bass, oddly enough. picked up the tip from Lyctum/TesseractStudios.
 If you want to make an apple pie from scratch...you must first invent the universe
www.soundcloud.com/tasp
www.soundcloud.com/kinematic-records |
|
|
|
Upavas
Upavas
Started Topics :
150
Posts :
3315
Posted : Mar 17, 2013 21:36
|
|
Geom3
IsraTrance Junior Member
Started Topics :
12
Posts :
479
Posted : Mar 17, 2013 22:04
|
ahh yes of course Ubik!!
and haha yes it makes me wana cry wen i wana get really intense with phase mistress "hence the thread" ...on a 2.2 single core Athlon 64, 3gig of ram it can hurt it .....i love it so much tho
|
|
|
|
PoM
IsraTrance Full Member
Started Topics :
162
Posts :
8087
Posted : Mar 17, 2013 22:29
|
u he one is cool too ! when i demoed a fews some time ago i liked it.
i never noticed phase mistress is cpu heavy, not a bug? maybe i never used enough instance to notice it but this plug is old its surprising |
|
|
|
Nectarios
Martian Arts
Started Topics :
187
Posts :
5292
Posted : Mar 17, 2013 22:38
|
|
woodster77
IsraTrance Full Member
Started Topics :
119
Posts :
1733
Posted : Mar 17, 2013 23:20
|
|
woodster77
IsraTrance Full Member
Started Topics :
119
Posts :
1733
Posted : Mar 17, 2013 23:29
|
pew..! pew...! |
|
|
|
Geom3
IsraTrance Junior Member
Started Topics :
12
Posts :
479
Posted : Mar 18, 2013 00:54
|
well then i guess its a bugg..windows for ya eh..some phase mistress algorithms styles it just cant handle...
haa yeh woodster set phasers to stun .......the crowd 
|
|
|
|
Xsze
Started Topics :
5
Posts :
657
Posted : Mar 18, 2013 15:37
|
Phase Mistress, but dig U He one too 
|
|
|
|
PoM
IsraTrance Full Member
Started Topics :
162
Posts :
8087
Posted : Mar 18, 2013 18:48
|
the one is mashine is also decent imo, logic one too
depend if you are after more lush/analog or more early digital sound..
|
|
|
|
willsanquil
IsraTrance Full Member
Started Topics :
93
Posts :
2822
Posted : Mar 18, 2013 19:51
|
Quote:
|
On 2013-03-17 22:38, Nectarios wrote:
Phase Mistress is not CPU heavy over here.
|
|
Pretty much all the SoundToys plugins IMO are CPU heavier than counterparts from other synth companies like U-He. Crystallizer, Decapitator, Phasemistress are the biggest ones but they're not prohibitively CPU intense if you have a good system...though I haven't used them in a while as I reach for other plugs at the moment.
If you want to make an apple pie from scratch...you must first invent the universe
www.soundcloud.com/tasp
www.soundcloud.com/kinematic-records |
|
|
|
woodster77
IsraTrance Full Member
Started Topics :
119
Posts :
1733
Posted : Mar 18, 2013 21:49
|
Quote:
|
On 2013-03-18 18:48, PoM wrote:
the one is mashine is also decent imo,
|
|
all the effects in Maschine except from the verbs are descent, love the Bitcrusher on the LOFI, also one of the better flangers around as well |
|
|
|
