| Author
|
The Mother of all SOUNDCARDS thread
|
Kane
IsraTrance Junior Member
Started Topics :
23
Posts :
1772
Posted : Mar 19, 2009 11:53
|
Ah..ok. 
Or you could do the same thing once and put the recording 180 degrees out of phase with the original..see what it missed.
  You believe in the users?
Yeah, sure. If I don't have a user, then who wrote me? |
|
|
|
~:MuZiK
IsraTrance Junior Member
Started Topics :
13
Posts :
133
Posted : Mar 21, 2009 18:15
|
Hello guys. Quick question:
What external soundcard would you buy (can be used in good cond.) if you got 350EUR? For longer use!
Some oppinions of your choices (why this one) would be also nice!
Thanks! Medulla Oblongata & Xibalba Festival Crew |
|
|
|
Phasmatix81
IsraTrance Junior Member
Started Topics :
25
Posts :
70
Posted : Mar 23, 2009 14:26
|
|
~d2~
Inactive User
Started Topics :
7
Posts :
751
Posted : Mar 23, 2009 15:32
|
|
Check out the EMU 1620m. Make sure its the "m version" |
|
|
|
bandarlog
Bandarlog
Started Topics :
44
Posts :
809
Posted : Mar 25, 2009 16:05
|
|
Methodic Marble
IsraTrance Full Member
Started Topics :
54
Posts :
384
Posted : Mar 31, 2009 00:10
|
a little help plz....
well i got a RME fireface 400 recentlay..and have format my pc...withc isnºt very powerfull...but with my last sound card..ozone maudio_midicontroler/audio interface..i could make a lot of music with a couple of VST´s.
Now with RME fireface 400 witch problalby/suposed would save some cpu charge, i cant put 4 vst.....the CPU goes to max..and i have a lot of breaks...:S :S godamit...
ive try some settings but nothing works...
PLZ any sugestions ?
thanxks 
> http://www.myspace.com/methodicmarble |
|
|
|
Kane
IsraTrance Junior Member
Started Topics :
23
Posts :
1772
Posted : Mar 31, 2009 03:01
|
Get a good DAW before a $1200 interface?
How many MIDI tracks were you able to play before?
You believe in the users?
Yeah, sure. If I don't have a user, then who wrote me? |
|
|
|
~d2~
Inactive User
Started Topics :
7
Posts :
751
Posted : Mar 31, 2009 03:40
|
|
Bounce to disk |
|
|
|
malkaviam
Malkaviam
Started Topics :
6
Posts :
283
Posted : Apr 6, 2009 01:04
|
|
Edirol Interfaces!
---------> |
|
|
|
Kane
IsraTrance Junior Member
Started Topics :
23
Posts :
1772
Posted : Apr 7, 2009 00:43
|
Quote:
|
On 2009-04-06 01:04, malkaviam wrote:
Edirol Interfaces!
|
|
Very good for the price!
You believe in the users?
Yeah, sure. If I don't have a user, then who wrote me? |
|
|
|
*eLliSDee*
IsraTrance Junior Member
Started Topics :
40
Posts :
671
Posted : Apr 9, 2009 17:25
|
Will having a 24/96khz card improve the output qaulity when converting from Fruity project to WAV? -compared to 16/44
I'm convinced my projects sound better(clear) when i switch from 44khz to 48 (ASIO4all v2)in the audio settings with fruity. FL do not recommend it for causing oddities
I'm looking at firewire options for my laptop. Just curious, will the output quality of my VSTs sound better? |
|
|
|
Kane
IsraTrance Junior Member
Started Topics :
23
Posts :
1772
Posted : Apr 10, 2009 04:48
|
No, not at all. Only in terms of monitoring. The playback may sound better to you while you're working on your track or listening to a rendered mix (which would be pretty unlikely since most players don't support 24/96 wav), but 98% of the time you'll have to convert it to 16/44.1 before burning it or sending it to a label. The most you can do is bounce your mix at 24/96, master it, then render that at 16/44.1.
Your interface/sound card's capabilities and quality have nothing to do with bouncing tracks unless you're working with hardware. You don't need a card capable of converting 24/96 to analog signal to render a track in 24/96. If you're using the same DAW, it won't matter if you have a $100 card or a $2000 one (although the $100 card probably won't be able to process the audio if you DAW's output [to monitoring] bit/sample rate is at 24/96).
You believe in the users?
Yeah, sure. If I don't have a user, then who wrote me? |
|
|
|
*eLliSDee*
IsraTrance Junior Member
Started Topics :
40
Posts :
671
Posted : Apr 13, 2009 19:31
|
If I understand this correct;; The only benefits to getting a 24/96 card would be for better monitoring & mastering and (from what i understand from other posts) reducing some latency -before ultimatly rendering back to a 16/44 medium.
Why not better to monitor with 16/44? ->so not to fool myself with unachievable quality
|
|
|
|
Kane
IsraTrance Junior Member
Started Topics :
23
Posts :
1772
Posted : Apr 14, 2009 04:57
|
The end result will still sound better most of the time, since you can do all of your processing in 24 bit (and still be able to hear it as you work) before the final render. The most important benefit of having a 24/96 card is for recording, but this doesn't effect most trance producers.
Either way, if you want to buy a decent card/interface I think you'll have trouble finding one that doesn't have this capability.
You believe in the users?
Yeah, sure. If I don't have a user, then who wrote me? |
|
|
|
DJ_PSYNYDE
IsraTrance Junior Member
Started Topics :
23
Posts :
275
Posted : Apr 20, 2009 20:44
|
|
