AudioGL released! :)

On 2013-03-05 03:25, Suloo wrote:
anything else to share ontopic maybe?

On 2013-03-04 18:54, Xsze wrote:

Quote:

On 2013-03-04 03:15, smoker wrote: a lot vst company don't do vst for mac

I didn't notice that, what you miss on mac and it's windows only, please enlighten me?

Every serious company have both platforms covered, g-sonique make toys and if you find few others it's not even worth putting them in equation, you could rave about tdm,aax,rtas and things like that, but vst's please...

On 2013-03-04 17:18, PoM wrote:

Quote:

On 2013-03-04 04:47, smoker wrote: Quote: On 2013-03-04 03:43, Suloo wrote: he had a crowd funding campain a year ago where he only reached 20% of his goal. The money was supposed to be for mac development as well. Now there is an investor who offers to give money for mac development, but just an offer yet officially, so don`t know if they sort that out. my opinion is development do big mastic when they programing only for windows. The reason almost every mac user buy vst plugs or software and windows users more then 80% of them using cracking software. and development lose a lot money, they maybe do the goal money but it will take faster when you have mac users to.

true ! osx version should be priority in term of buisness but i guess some don t have a mac yet to support both or not much intrested into making cash

On 2013-03-05 06:10, smoker wrote:

Quote:

On 2013-03-04 17:18, PoM wrote: Quote: On 2013-03-04 04:47, smoker wrote: Quote: On 2013-03-04 03:43, Suloo wrote: he had a crowd funding campain a year ago where he only reached 20% of his goal. The money was supposed to be for mac development as well. Now there is an investor who offers to give money for mac development, but just an offer yet officially, so don`t know if they sort that out. my opinion is development do big mastic when they programing only for windows. The reason almost every mac user buy vst plugs or software and windows users more then 80% of them using cracking software. and development lose a lot money, they maybe do the goal money but it will take faster when you have mac users to. true ! osx version should be priority in term of buisness but i guess some don t have a mac yet to support both or not much intrested into making cash

then why to sell it give it for free then

On 2013-03-05 12:46, Suloo wrote:
development costs time..if you spend time on development you do not earn cash to make a living in the first place. if your saved cash is limited you need to focus on things your best at. In his situation its developing for win. He doesn`t seem to have the supposed knowledge how to proper code mac software, so he decided to bring the win version first.

easy as that..

wee all right some way with are opinion's

On 2013-03-06 07:50, Suloo wrote:

Quote:

wee all right some way with are opinion's

sorry, don`t quite get what you say here. you mean we all have the right to go some way with our opinions?

On 2013-03-05 02:54, Alien Bug wrote:

Quote:

On 2013-03-04 20:25, PoM wrote: i miss vaz modular ,xhip but so long time i haven't used these, maybe i would not like them as much as before..

today im switch back to vaz modular. it's still great i love that freaky possibilities of modulation, sound and that old skool gui mega inspiring piece of soft worth to run your old pc
ahh and low cpu usage is redemption for my present busy project

vaz reminds me fun of playing with old analogs like sh101 (i havent touch any for long long time) but this nasty distorted raw rez sounds... mmmm... its hard to do this on even newest vsti

just first patch what i made after 1 minute of fun: http://www52.zippyshare.com/v/47518010/file.html