| Author
|
320 vs. wav
|
Colin OOOD
Moderator
Started Topics :
95
Posts :
5380
Posted : Apr 12, 2009 04:30
|
|
Kane
IsraTrance Junior Member
Started Topics :
23
Posts :
1772
Posted : Apr 12, 2009 12:31
|
Quote:
|
On 2009-04-10 16:35, Cardinals Cartel wrote:
I like listening my music 24 or 32 bit .
|
|
You get all of your music from artists and mastering engineers directly?
  You believe in the users?
Yeah, sure. If I don't have a user, then who wrote me? |
|
|
|
Kitnam
Mantik
Started Topics :
110
Posts :
1151
Posted : Apr 14, 2009 22:37
|
now, after clearing this i prefer beeing unprofessional if playing 320 is "unprofessional".
|
|
|
|
R2D2
Inactive User
Started Topics :
1
Posts :
43
Posted : Apr 16, 2009 16:18
|
Can someone at isratrance explain to me why I can't mention the Meridian Lossless Packing codec?
Why delete my posts and threaten me with a ban? yet Pm from an account that I can't reply to? A one way conversation? Where did the fascist attitude come from? |
|
|
|
Psynthex
IsraTrance Junior Member
Started Topics :
41
Posts :
677
Posted : Apr 16, 2009 16:31
|
Remember me my dear D2, why were you banned at the first place? And what MLP lossless ( which is mentioned above ) has to do with anything? and not so many people knows this technique of compression! If you would enlighten them / us at the first place there wouldnt be a problem. And you have written CODEC at the last post. So try to behave and help as much as you can. Thank you in advance!
Psynthex [ Vertikal Records ]
http://www.myspace.com/psynthex
Minniq [ Parked Below Records ]
Frequent Pill [ Ultimae Records ] |
|
|
|
R2D2
Inactive User
Started Topics :
1
Posts :
43
Posted : Apr 16, 2009 16:36
|
This is a thread about a form of compression vs wav. How is another codec not worthy of the discussion?
What is this editing of my posts rubbish?
This is getting childish now. Is there an adult at istratrance team I can speak with?
|
|
|
|
Psynthex
IsraTrance Junior Member
Started Topics :
41
Posts :
677
Posted : Apr 16, 2009 16:49
|
Please continue with topic debate 
Psynthex [ Vertikal Records ]
http://www.myspace.com/psynthex
Minniq [ Parked Below Records ]
Frequent Pill [ Ultimae Records ] |
|
|
|
Axis Mundi
Axis Mundi
Started Topics :
75
Posts :
1848
Posted : Apr 20, 2009 18:55
|
There is simply not point to using an mp3 for producing unless you simply HAVE to use that sound and you don't have anything else (even then hopefully it's not planned to be a dominant sound in your track also.
DJing live over a loud PA using mp3's instead of wavs does make an audible difference (please don't do it.)
|
|
|
|
Upavas
Upavas
Started Topics :
150
Posts :
3315
Posted : Apr 20, 2009 22:15
|
Quote:
|
On 2009-04-20 18:55, Axis Mundi wrote:
There is simply not point to using an mp3 for producing unless you simply HAVE to use that sound and you don't have anything else (even then hopefully it's not planned to be a dominant sound in your track also.
DJing live over a loud PA using mp3's instead of wavs does make an audible difference (please don't do it.)
|
|
 +1 !!!
Upavas - Here And Now (Sangoma Rec.) new EP out Oct.29th, get it here:
http://timecode.bandcamp.com
http://upavas.com
http://soundcloud.com/upavas-1/ |
|
|
|
reEto
IsraTrance Junior Member
Started Topics :
44
Posts :
31
Posted : Apr 21, 2009 19:15
|
there is no vs.
mp3 is a COMPRESSED FORMAT. you everytime lose digital information
wav is one of the UNCOMPRESSED formats. like FLAC, AIF. Complete digital information.
·».¸¸.·*¨`·» .hiB - modular created & tri modular mixed Music - http://www.reeto.de «·´¨*·.¸¸.«· |
|
|
|
polly
IsraTrance Junior Member
Started Topics :
10
Posts :
203
Posted : Apr 26, 2009 16:29
|
|
Kane
IsraTrance Junior Member
Started Topics :
23
Posts :
1772
Posted : Apr 26, 2009 21:18
|
good point..
You believe in the users?
Yeah, sure. If I don't have a user, then who wrote me? |
|
|
|
Spindrift
Spindrift
Started Topics :
33
Posts :
1560
Posted : Apr 28, 2009 22:02
|
And the difference between converters will usually be a lot more prominent than when comparing a 320kbps to a wav....but we don't get pages and pages of discussion regarding that many CD players used at parties have converter technology which is over a decade old.
But we will keep getting pages of statements along the lines of "mp3's instead of wavs does make an audible difference", but as usual no proof to substantiate the claims.
Probably because there is none and all blind tests I have seen come to the same conclusion, that people cannot tell the difference reliably.
For example you can join in here and show off with being able to do what all other participants so far failed:
http://forum.ableton.com/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=113877
Why will never one of the persons claiming to be able to tell the difference at least post a WinABX log here?
(``·.¸(``·.¸(``·.¸¸.·`´)¸.·`´)¸.·`´)
« .....www.ResonantEarth.com..... »
(¸.·`´(¸.·`´(¸.·`´``·.¸)``·.¸)``·.¸)
http://www.myspace.com/spindriftsounds
http://www.myspace.com/resonantearth |
|
|
|
Kitnam
Mantik
Started Topics :
110
Posts :
1151
Posted : Apr 29, 2009 12:07
|
there has been some very deep technical discussion with some good fact-based arguments here about playing mp3 vs wav.
just coming along and say "dont play mp3" without any technical-based explanation is not only esoteric, its completely ignoring pages of serious discussion.
please bring arguments if you say, "dont play mp3" otherwise it does not add any value to this discussion. its only generating mythical bla bla.
Anyway I agree that converters and mastering are the main reasons where true difference is generated from. Playing selfmastered wav out of a cheap m-audio interface for the wav only surely does not make anything better.
|
|
|
|
DJSarasin
IsraTrance Junior Member
Started Topics :
27
Posts :
789
Posted : Apr 29, 2009 12:21
|
|
