| Author
|
What is the better PC software: Fl producer or Cubase Sx?
|
piXan
IsraTrance Full Member
Started Topics :
107
Posts :
807
Posted : Nov 8, 2004 07:41
|
c´'mon bros this again?
i respect everyone that can make good music on either fruity loops or cubase or their own bare hands and a stick, but obviously cubase is a much better audio midi seqquencer than fruity..
see ya |
|
|
EYB
Noized
Started Topics :
111
Posts :
2849
Posted : Nov 8, 2004 08:09
|
Fl rulez.
Any one who is saying this or that is better for producing psytrance is dumb.
 Signature |
|
|
|
AhmedTaburov
IsraTrance Full Member
Started Topics :
67
Posts :
294
Posted : Nov 8, 2004 13:28
|
|
I always say USE THEM BOTH!!!
===> |
|
|
|
Input
IsraTrance Junior Member
Started Topics :
24
Posts :
456
Posted : Nov 8, 2004 14:42
|
tell me guys what is better?
knife or scissors??
what i'm trying to say is- both can do the job- some prefer scissors and some used to knife- whatever whatever- find another topic guys- Space is the place
http://www.megabit.co.il |
|
|
|
WAVELOGIX
Wavelogix
Started Topics :
136
Posts :
1214
Posted : Nov 8, 2004 22:15
|
Quote:
|
On 2004-11-08 14:42, Input wrote:
what i'm trying to say is- both can do the job- some prefer scissors and some used to knife- whatever whatever- find another topic guys-
|
|
PLEASE ...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CTPJuMSwzUQ |
|
|
|
hipsylon
IsraTrance Junior Member
Started Topics :
13
Posts :
24
Posted : Nov 8, 2004 23:12
|
Whatsup! well.. i was working with FL Studio.. and i get some good stuff on it.. but.. its true that you need sounds more "professional" that kind of mastering of your tracks on FL do it with Cubase SX or Logic Audio. but in a started time.. it's good that you play with FL, the next step is learn Cubase/Logic!
Much ppl says that FL sux, FL blah blah, for me, thats fine "except" the quality of sound. Use the soft that u consider the best.. the thing important on it is the TRACK that you do with your brain and a lot of ideas =).
If somebody is a master on Cubase SX2 and have some time to teach me how to make stuff on it i will be happy!  (i know the basics of cubase and FL i have 100% of knowledge, i think jeje)
Gr33tZ! heh
halo, founder of the Psytrance Emergency Response Team
[http://halo.id.ru] |
|
|
|
AjmaGard
AjmaGard
Started Topics :
8
Posts :
122
Posted : Nov 8, 2004 23:29
|
|
Mo-Dul
IsraTrance Junior Member
Started Topics :
15
Posts :
135
Posted : Nov 9, 2004 00:17
|
Listen man...
There is a lot of options to work with both of the progs as I do.
You can Rewire FL to your cubase or you can
record you FL job as a regular audio channel in your Cubase.
Cubase can be a great tool for the mastering of your FL made track, and this is a good
way to learn the basics of cubase!
To make a whole track just in Cubase is very
hard.
I have friends who released CDs already under several labels in Israel and 80% of
their work is made in FL so it can be a very
proffesional software if you learn it good!
Peace..
|
|
|
|
PsychoMachine
Started Topics :
1
Posts :
4
Posted : Nov 22, 2004 17:10
|
I have used FLStudio & Reason...I ***LOVE** Fruity Loops...I think Reason is ok if you want to sound like everyone else...I haven't yet used cubase, but I intend to at some point...FL is by far the easiest, most intuitive software currently available. & it supports most of the same VST's as cubase. I have yet to use it with hardware, but I will be soon, so we'll see how that goes.
:::Bom:::
:::Sean:::
:::HyperFocus Records::: |
|
|
|
H2O
IsraTrance Junior Member
Started Topics :
16
Posts :
352
Posted : Nov 22, 2004 18:01
|
Dj Looper , Cubase is much more advanced sequencer than Fruity Loops but it doesn't mean you can't produce good music on FL alone . There is no real problem to use Cubase or Fruity , FL have just user freindly interface when Cubase don't .
LOL . Every forum the same . For sure there are some real Fruity Loops experts because some of them don't know about 24bit resolution in Fruity and some used it when it wasn't released yet when others never made any sound simple check or compare features of both programms .
Somehow i think the Spindrift is the clearest mind here . Since all Fruity Loops disadvantages in sound or sequencing maybe limit you somewhere but not limit enough to not to get good product .
I want some serious guys with knowledge that would like to test Fruity with Cubase . Would be very intresting i guess .
For those who believe that Reason is more sound wise than Fruity .
http://members.shaw.ca/stu.macQ/index.htm |
|
|
|
ND
ProSect
Started Topics :
44
Posts :
919
Posted : Nov 22, 2004 18:26
|
FL, Cubase, Logic, Reason...
if you know what you're doing, using your brain - you can produce good music with Notepad or Photoshop!
amateur is not the right word here i think, amateur can be the producer.
and limits make your brain to work more, and invent some new ways while using your imagination.
about the sound not sure, so perhaps something better, something worse but not in huge levels, you also can guide the soft you using to better sound while another person can get bad sound on other soft that seems to be as better one.
my evolution sequence: Impulse Tracker > ModPlug Tracker > FL > Sonar > Orion > Cubase >< FL back to fruity cause of easier brainstorming, quick idea transfer, flexibility, lower cpu use (and my pc is quite slow now), but again i'm rotating between FL and Cubase, due to mood, cpu, project etc.
ND.
Without Deviation, Progress Is Not Possible.
www.andivision.com
Sound Field / ProSect / Sonify / Radio Mess |
|
|
|
Anak
Anakoluth
Started Topics :
108
Posts :
2395
Posted : Nov 22, 2004 19:37
|
|
Mo-Dul
IsraTrance Junior Member
Started Topics :
15
Posts :
135
Posted : Nov 22, 2004 22:46
|
I work pretty much as Anak and in my opinion
it's a good way.
I wanna say that Cubase can master the sound
so good you won't believe it's even made in
Fruity loops.
But Fruity loops sucks when it comes to audio
hardware. If you own a good synth then Cubase
is your only decent resolution!
Peace..
|
|
|
|
UnderTow
Started Topics :
9
Posts :
1448
Posted : Nov 23, 2004 03:18
|
Quote:
|
On 2004-11-22 22:46, Mo-Dul wrote:
If you own a good synth then Cubase
is your only decent resolution!
|
|
How about Samplitude 7 or Sonar 4 or even Logic 5.5? (And Digital Performer on the Mac). Just to add some confusion. 
UnderTow |
|
|
|
Elad
Tsabeat/Sattel Battle
Started Topics :
158
Posts :
5306
Posted : Nov 23, 2004 09:04
|
sequencer is sequencer is sequencer
if u know what u want u just need to do it.
wtf is matter with what program?
*cubase
*reason
*fl studio
*logic
*sonar
*orion
on each one of those written more then 1-2 cd's... so its all kinda bullshit..
www.sattelbattle.com
http://yoavweinberg.weebly.com/ |
|
|
|
