want the real industry secret to make succesfull hits ?? get in :)

On 2007-04-22 03:31, Seppa wrote:
Change your life ?! all Wanted is for you to back your statment.

--i think i did , with the link. i dont need to do it to see how easy it is.


you tried the pass on a message with this thread and i did not agree.

--tell this to skazi , im not passing messege , im pointing out the sad but true.

you did diminished the work and the talent of a band, by stating it was only copy and paste music .

-- yes ,as i was huge fan , and now i respect them about 50% then before knowing its all other peaple riffs and sounds.

you also pointed that i could not recognise analog sound and that this was computer music.

--there are complete sites with this tests of analog vs digital , find one and discover for yourself no body can recognize the diffrence with 100% acuracy.

you also mentinoned that the way to success was easy with the title of your thread.

--there u go , after 10 years i try to make my own music , thinking work as hard as u can will make it.. but nop.. i see all the big names actualy just copycats. not my wish or opinion , prooved. see daft punk , shpongle , chemical brothers , chemical crew.

thats why i challenged you cause I seriously think that as a random isratrancer who happen to be a sound engineer, I simply don't agree with your statment and you have nothing to back this up since i haven't seen or heard a release from you of this league.

-- my album realesed i think was clear from the very first step , isnt gonna be commercial , and probably there are 3000 peaple like this sub-genre in the hole world.. when i start make house we will chat again and see..

I'm sorry if i just mentioned your work that is not personal. I just wanned you to proove me wrong by showing me something of this league cause you talked like you were part of it.
you have nothing to prove to me then don't make statment of this size.cause i don't need to be jean michel jarre to tell you that!

--u right in a way , but i dont need to be skazi to point that out..

If i say something i can always back it up.

-- well , i think the raja ram live show where him "sings" with akai samples that i have ... prooving itself.

another thing you abiously did not hear the early music of daft punk 97 first album and other singles they release since 94 where is the copy and paste here?????????

--i see samples of "da funk" and "around the world"

http://palmsout.blogspot.com/2007/02/sample-wednesday-27-daft-punk.html

the funny thing is, with this messages i must look like a big daft punk fan , the truth is i know all their work but i only like some of it and still don't agree with you.

--well , i still like discovery and human after all albums alot , specialy the "intrstela 5555" animation ..

with that , my respect for them went heaps down.
hypothetic : if i had milions of dollars and i was music promoter , i would think to make huge show of them , now i will look for other *original* artist.. (soon i will start think nothing is original , i just may be dont know the real origin.)

after more research i can cnfirm they do give the credits to the original song writers

They use analogue? So what? How does that make them better musicians? Again, they have good production techniques but that is beside the point of that video.

tsabeat has nothing to backup because he is just commenting on what he, and everyone else, can see in that video clip. The message of the video is very clear: They performed blatant plagiarism of other people's art. Wether this is entirely correct or not is another discsussion but the message is clear for all to see.

On 2007-04-24 21:26, Saf wrote:
Wait, why is Shpongle copycat? Serious question.

On 2007-04-24 21:26, Saf wrote:
Wait, why is Shpongle copycat? Serious question.

On 2007-04-25 00:06, tsabeat wrote:
shpongle use akai samples and then act like they play "live" with the flutes and stupid raja ram "sing" with microphone (plugged to what?) with akai samples i have in my folder.. just rediculus