| Author
|
vanguard trancegate automation
|
bandarlog
Bandarlog
Started Topics :
44
Posts :
809
Posted : Aug 1, 2004 19:43
|
I'm a bit lost with the vanguard trancegate automation (pattern) using FL. I can automate it but it just doesn't make any sense. Only time you can control it decently is using midi learn and manipulating the pattern while playing. If I draw something in 'edit events' (trancegate pattern) it looks like it's made ad random. Anyone any experience with it?
Thanks |
|
|
PsyGoatDelic
IsraTrance Junior Member
Started Topics :
45
Posts :
359
Posted : Aug 2, 2004 03:23
|
|
i tried it once... i think its random or something like that... or every automation high got a linked pattern of the trancegate
|
|
|
|
Kitnam
Mantik
Started Topics :
110
Posts :
1151
Posted : Aug 2, 2004 15:36
|
Its just a stepsequencer. If you hit a bar, the gate is "opened". So its not randomed. Your hands have controll over it. For best results edit a whole note like a pad and switch the trancegate "on".
You will also get nice lines if you are going to use it in combination with the arpeggio, quikly. |
|
|
|
bandarlog
Bandarlog
Started Topics :
44
Posts :
809
Posted : Aug 2, 2004 21:17
|
Quote:
|
On 2004-08-02 15:36, Kitnam wrote:
Its just a stepsequencer. If you hit a bar, the gate is "opened". So its not randomed. Your hands have controll over it. For best results edit a whole note like a pad and switch the trancegate "on". |
|
uhu..sure, offcourse it's a stepsequencer but my question is: how to change the stepsequencer while it's on, using automation (drawing it). So I don't mean switching it on or off or changing the stepsequencer using your mouse, which is quite easily. |
|
|
|
monstrilla
Offtopic posts:
1
Posted: Aug 2, 2004
|
stop using fruity loops, it's the best way IMO  ) |
|
|
|
EYB
Noized
Offtopic posts:
15
Posted: Aug 2, 2004
|
Quote:
|
On 2004-08-02 23:31, monstrilla wrote:
stop using fruity loops, it's the best way IMO )
|
|
Stupid!
 Signature |
|
|
|
monstrilla
Started Topics :
0
Posts :
7
Posted : Aug 3, 2004 01:01
|
|
EYB: using FL is stupid |
|
|
|
orange
Fat Data
Started Topics :
154
Posts :
3918
Posted : Aug 3, 2004 01:12
|
why stop using fl man??????
maybe its to difficult for you ????
so why guys like mike oldfield use it they are stupid too????
dont judge if you dont wanna be judged...!!
I LOVE FRUITY LOOPS!!!!!
maybe you make music on ejay..???!!!!
xaxaxaxaxax ... just joking
orange
http://www.landmark-recordings.com/
http://soundcloud.com/kymamusic |
|
|
|
monstrilla
Started Topics :
0
Posts :
7
Posted : Aug 3, 2004 01:22
|
|
cubase forever |
|
|
|
orange
Fat Data
Started Topics :
154
Posts :
3918
Posted : Aug 3, 2004 01:30
|
|
monstrilla
Started Topics :
0
Posts :
7
Posted : Aug 3, 2004 01:42
|
bandarlog:
i tried to automate it with cubase, i'ts just didn't make any sence, maybe people at reFX didn't think that somebody would try to automate such things
orange: Cubase is more complex and advanced program, and it great for VST automation too |
|
|
|
orange
Fat Data
Started Topics :
154
Posts :
3918
Posted : Aug 3, 2004 01:46
|
|
monstrilla
Started Topics :
0
Posts :
7
Posted : Aug 3, 2004 01:56
|
orange:
yeah, let's mix with $2 headphones, sequence 22 kHz samples with DOS trackers, record all this on tapes, and be happy with it, right?
let's just stop this disput, 'cause it's an offtopic, PM if you have something to discuss |
|
|
|
bandarlog
Bandarlog
Started Topics :
44
Posts :
809
Posted : Aug 3, 2004 04:03
|
@Monstrilla:
Do you see the irony in your posts?  First you say: 'don't use FL' (in order to solve the problem), then you start bashing on FL and then ...(how ironic)...it seems that the great magnificent cubase isn't able to solve the problem either! Does it bother you that I use FL? Did I ask for comments or judgements of my personal host? No... If you per-sé want to judge me, judge me on the music I produce and not on the program I'm using. Then, secondly: I've seen cubase and the midi editor (which is about the same thing as the pianoroll in FL) and I must say: give me FL! much easier, especially because I KNOW how to use it quick. I know you can do more and better things in cubase and when I need to do those things, I will. But FL has advantages you obviously haven't discovered yet, shame...
So what's the result of this thread (again!)? A lot of bashing FL, some arguements and in the end nada solution for my problem because, so it seems, it's not the fault of the host! These days it seems impossible to ask a normal question about a vst or some problem if you mention that you're using FL. No, admitt you use FL and some fool finds it absolutely necessary to whine about the fact that you're using it! Who cares what I use? Do you? well sorry mom, won't do it again!
|
|
|
|
jhanna
IsraTrance Junior Member
Started Topics :
28
Posts :
178
Posted : Aug 3, 2004 04:24
|
|
i use both cubase sx an fruity loops studio. cubase supprot for automation is way better.nothing against fruity but it is true, cubase will always be better, specially for automation, best is loggic. |
|
|
|
