| Author
|
Trilogy vs CronoX 2
|
Get-a-fix
Getafix
Started Topics :
147
Posts :
1441
Posted : Mar 3, 2007 00:56
|
|
PoM
IsraTrance Full Member
Started Topics :
162
Posts :
8087
Posted : Mar 3, 2007 01:05
|
|
it s hard to say cause of the level,the cronox is a lot louder,trilogy sound purest to me, less bad frequencies but it can be the level difference.i like both,wich saw you used in trilogy?trilogy need some db more and maybe less lowend and it ll be my favorite |
|
|
Get-a-fix
Getafix
Started Topics :
147
Posts :
1441
Posted : Mar 3, 2007 01:16
|
|
0hz
IsraTrance Junior Member
Started Topics :
10
Posts :
261
Posted : Mar 3, 2007 10:57
|
|
they both sound very unnatural and boomy and over compressed. also sounds like u used quadrafuzz but u didnt set the correct crossover points. |
|
|
|
e-motion
IsraTrance Full Member
Started Topics :
71
Posts :
933
Posted : Mar 3, 2007 12:14
|
i think both have different uses. both of them are my favorite synths but when i use them i produce completly different basses. so doing the same on both is not a good test 
in my humble opinion: cronox is the bomb for --- basslines and trilogy is the bomb for _-_
 Pyrex :: Traveling without moving
www.myspace.com/pyrexperience |
|
|
|
Get-a-fix
Getafix
Started Topics :
147
Posts :
1441
Posted : Mar 3, 2007 12:31
|
Quote:
|
On 2007-03-03 10:57, 0hz wrote:
they both sound very unnatural and boomy and over compressed. also sounds like u used quadrafuzz but u didnt set the correct crossover points.
|
|
Yeah you gotta realise i was making these at midnight at really low volume so i ended up over processing them..
What do you mean by the correct crossover points?
http://www.soundcloud.com/getafixmusic |
|
|
|
