| Author
|
Thermic death by entropy is coming
|
CRX(HSS Records)
IsraTrance Full Member
Started Topics :
97
Posts :
2707
Posted : Jan 19, 2008 18:27
|
|
full_on
IsraTrance Team
Started Topics :
279
Posts :
5475
Posted : Jan 19, 2008 21:10
|
Basically this article brings nothing new, and has nothing to do with thermic death by entropy.
Also this article is only about positrons, not anti-atoms (which would be more appropriately called antimatter). Didn't like it.
Respect!
  .
...Be gentle with the earth...
...Dance like nobody's watching...
.
...I don't mind not going to Heaven, as long as they've got Coffee in Hell... |
|
|
|
CRX(HSS Records)
IsraTrance Full Member
Started Topics :
97
Posts :
2707
Posted : Jan 20, 2008 16:01
|
Hey fullon
antimatter is called neutrinos and matter is made of quark.antiatom is not an official term since science hasn't verified the existence of antimatter till now
I understand what u are trying to say in here
I am just wanted to show to ppl that the scientist have sealed the fact that indeed there is a power of destruction that destroy the natural elements and in the long run it will get back into us
This for me is the first step to the ultimate revelation The ultimate revelation is the fact that indeed the thermic death by entropy is innevitable
I mean look at the cosmic egg(or however u like to call it ) as an ingridient x with an atomic weight n
In our science the uranium which has an atomic weight of 64 layers is so sensitive that even humans with 2000 of physic study in their backs have managed to break.
Now lets take it to a cosmic scale
imagine how unstable is an ingidient like the cosmos and how catastrophic a single neutron can be if it hits the core
I am preety convinced that this neutron has really hit the core and somewhere in the universe a wave of hellfire is marching at it turns everything to nothing and thats the final stage of the "human project".
Perhaps I am crazy but in the end we live in a world where ppl is floating in the air holden by hooks grabbed in their backs or rape children!Am i the crazy one?
it needs xl imagination but its simple logic
I wish I could share a cup of coffee with u to discuss about it since me inglish sux but for now lets stay on topic  but i will get back with new info
Some facts about entropy:
http://www.jirrs.org/jirrs_nr_1/05-bourceanu.pdf
Keep in touch
CRX,leader of"Prevent Entropy:Make Earth a positron"campaign-now on facebook
Helicon Sounds Music
www.hssr.gr |
|
|
|
CRX(HSS Records)
IsraTrance Full Member
Started Topics :
97
Posts :
2707
Posted : Jan 20, 2008 16:03
|
PS : I am not a cult member
I just see things from another point of view
Helicon Sounds Music
www.hssr.gr |
|
|
|
full_on
IsraTrance Team
Started Topics :
279
Posts :
5475
Posted : Jan 20, 2008 23:11
|
Sorry, I mean no offense, but from my humble point of view I must say it's been some time since the last time I read so much bullshit together, specially in that pseudo-scientific article you provided the link (in fact it was funny to read).
I'll stick to the part where you suggested I'm wrong.
Quote:
|
On 2008-01-20 16:01, CRX(HSS Records) wrote:
Hey fullon
antimatter is called neutrinos and matter is made of quark.antiatom is not an official term since science hasn't verified the existence of antimatter till now
|
|
It seems you're not familiar with these scientific terms, so I'll give links to wiki to make it easy.
More about antimatter:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antimatter
Check the Standard Model to understand more about quarks and how matter is organized:
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/4/4c/Particle_chart.jpg
In short: you are wrong. 
Antimatter is not called neutrinos.
Science HAS verified the existence of antimatter, even atoms of antimatter were already produced before the year 2000 and even stored.
When I said antiatoms I was obviously referring to atoms of antimatter.
Interestingly you contradict yourself, even the first link you posted is called " Source of Mysterious Antimatter Found", but in fact it only talks about positrons which are basically anti-electrons.
Also what do you mean by "uranium which has an atomic weight of 64 layers"? Uranium has 92 protons and atomic weight 238, 235 and 234 (very rare), which means most commonly it has 146, 143 or 142 neutrons. Where are the 64 layers???
We all have different opinions. But I think mixing science with other stuff usually yields bad interpretations, and what is more common is to see people removing scientific terms from their context and using them in a totally weird (not to say erroneous) way.
Respect!
.
...Be gentle with the earth...
...Dance like nobody's watching...
.
...I don't mind not going to Heaven, as long as they've got Coffee in Hell... |
|
|
|
CRX(HSS Records)
IsraTrance Full Member
Started Topics :
97
Posts :
2707
Posted : Jan 21, 2008 02:26
|
I am pretty familiar with the terms I firstly mentioned friend.First,till now the facts about antimatter were the following:
Antimatter was first theorized based on work done in 1928 by the physicist Paul Dirac. The positron was discovered in 1932. Science fiction writers latched onto the concept and wrote of antiworlds and antiuniverses.
Unknowns remain
Though scientists like to see antimatter as a natural thing, much about it remains highly mysterious. Even some of the fictional portrayals of mirror-image objects have not been proven totally out of this world.
http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/antimatter_sun_030929.html
But the existance of antimatter became a fact only 10 days before after the announcement I provided in the first place.
i am going to sleep now but before I sleep I'll recommmend something from wiki and I would like u to read what it says in line 8.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antineutrino
also
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quark
maybe I dont speak english well but I think before i post
I'll get back on topic with links when I can
respect
Helicon Sounds Music
www.hssr.gr |
|
|
|
full_on
IsraTrance Team
Started Topics :
279
Posts :
5475
Posted : Jan 22, 2008 01:13
|
You seem to totally ignore the subject.
First, you just avoided commenting the links I sent, in which is written for laypersons to understand:
Quote:
|
The artificial production of atoms of antimatter (specifically antihydrogen) first became a reality in the early 1990s. An atom of antihydrogen comprises a negatively-charged antiproton being orbited by a positively-charged positron.
...
In 1995 CERN announced that it had successfully created nine antihydrogen atoms by implementing the SLAC/Fermilab concept during the PS210 experiment. The experiment was performed using the Low Energy Antiproton Ring (LEAR), and was led by Walter Oelert and Mario Macri. Fermilab soon confirmed the CERN findings by producing approximately 100 antihydrogen atoms at their facilities.
|
|
So humans actually produce antimatter atoms for more than 10 years now.
Still waiting for the explanation about the "uranium which has an atomic weight of 64 layers".
Not to be taken into account, but I think it may be useful to mention that I'm finishing my PhD in an excellent physics institute.
I also suggest you take a look into the Standard Model table link I posted, it is more interest and relevant to the subject than the wiki link to quarks.
Respect!
.
...Be gentle with the earth...
...Dance like nobody's watching...
.
...I don't mind not going to Heaven, as long as they've got Coffee in Hell... |
|
|
|
Zman
IsraTrance Junior Member
Started Topics :
14
Posts :
3784
Posted : Jan 24, 2008 07:33
|
|
looks like the helicon sound system ran out of batteries hehe |
|
|
|
Zman
IsraTrance Junior Member
Started Topics :
14
Posts :
3784
Posted : Feb 4, 2008 03:28
|
|
hello isn't the discussion going to continue? |
|
|
|
konvndrvm
IsraTrance Junior Member
Started Topics :
33
Posts :
1398
Posted : Feb 5, 2008 18:51
|
damn you zman for digging this up 
|
|
|
|
Zman
IsraTrance Junior Member
Started Topics :
14
Posts :
3784
Posted : Feb 6, 2008 03:52
|
hehe  |
|
|
|
CRX(HSS Records)
IsraTrance Full Member
Started Topics :
97
Posts :
2707
Posted : Feb 7, 2008 21:26
|
pussy
Hey I havent forgot the topic
Ive just been to busy fixing some projects
Forum is for chilling
full on u had a point about "uranium which has an atomic weight of 64 layers". The right number is 92 and thank u for correcting me
As far as the layers and why I refer to them are concerned , from a scientifil point of view :we are all liquid and everything is liquid
These layers and protect us from being totaly liquified!
Furthur explanations can be viewed at
http://joox.net/cat/44/id/2031003
http://joox.net/cat/44/id/1684535
http://joox.net/cat/44/id/2017934
I read the greek translations of Mr. Hawking views and books, a scientist which is internationally recognised as reliable , he considers the universe like a growing entity.
the way quarks and neutrinos are a growing entity which who have become atoms and molecules etc
Uranium with an atomic waight of 92 has a very high degree of entropy and man has already managed to divide its atom and create mass chaos!
Imagine the universe like the element x with an atomic waight of z , imagine how many godilions times bigger is its degree of entropy.
A random course of a neutron which has exploited the open spots caused by the high degree of entropy-disorder is capaple to bring the end of days
minor posssibility? Yes but as man divided the atom maybe God or other Divine entities can divide universes !
Nodody knows
but its a nightmerish scenario
But first what is entropy
Google "Thermic death by Entropy" and check the first option
Then go to google and Search "Thermal death by Entropy" or u can go to the straight to
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heat_death_of_the_universe
http://physics.bu.edu/~duffy/py105/Secondlaw.html
http://www.physlink.com/Education/AskExperts/ae181.cfm
http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/astro-ph/pdf/9701/9701131v1.pdf
thanks for the chart though very useful
So till now quarks are matter neutrinos are antimatter and Thermal death is possible.
Have u ever considered that the universe is a divine creation and that God moves in mysterious ways?
Everything is possible and everything can be done if your mind reach to it
because what we see is not real
the reality is an electric universe and the ultimate revelation is the images and thoughts we think because we all came from the same source we have the same age and we have a collective unconsiouss because we are all one
Helicon Sounds Music
www.hssr.gr |
|
|
|
nyama
Nyama
Started Topics :
45
Posts :
745
Posted : Feb 8, 2008 00:10
|
Quote:
|
On 2008-02-07 21:26, CRX(HSS Records) wrote:
we are all liquid and everything is liquid
These layers and protect us from being totaly liquified!
|
|
these are the best words for a place like this.... sooo true 
need to get one of those layers -----------------------------------------------
www.catawampus-records.co.uk |
|
|
|
Zman
IsraTrance Junior Member
Started Topics :
14
Posts :
3784
Posted : Feb 8, 2008 02:51
|
Quote:
|
On 2008-02-07 21:26, CRX(HSS Records) wrote:
pussy
Hey I havent forgot the topic
Ive just been to busy fixing some projects
Forum is for chilling
full on u had a point about "uranium which has an atomic weight of 64 layers". The right number is 92 and thank u for correcting me
|
|
Atomic mass is never measured in layers. Its the atomic number of Uranium thats 92 which determines the # of protons,electrons and neutrons in an atom of Uranium. The atomic mass of Uranium happens to be around + -238.030 |
|
|
|
CRX(HSS Records)
IsraTrance Full Member
Started Topics :
97
Posts :
2707
Posted : Feb 8, 2008 11:54
|
Quote:
|
On 2008-02-08 02:51, zmandan wrote:
Quote:
|
On 2008-02-07 21:26, CRX(HSS Records) wrote:
pussy
Hey I havent forgot the topic
Ive just been to busy fixing some projects
Forum is for chilling
full on u had a point about "uranium which has an atomic weight of 64 layers". The right number is 92 and thank u for correcting me
|
|
Atomic mass is never measured in layers. Its the atomic number of Uranium thats 92 which determines the # of protons,electrons and neutrons in an atom of Uranium. The atomic mass of Uranium happens to be around + -238.030
|
|
I know that the atomic mass is not measured in layers.Its myy own and not only interpretation of how these indgidients are placed and what do they look like in relation with the core of the atom.
Helicon Sounds Music
www.hssr.gr |
|
|
|
