| Author
|
Sonnox oxford native, Sony Oxford and DSP card powered
|
naga
IsraTrance Junior Member
Started Topics :
40
Posts :
204
Posted : Mar 4, 2009 04:38:13
|
I used sonnox oxford native EQ for some weeks and found it as piece of shit besides Waves EQs. These days I cannot even believe that I've used it in past! I hate my history with Sonnox Oxford. hehe. I don't have powercore version
many professionals claim that sonnox/sony oxford powercore eq is one of the best DAW's EQs. So is there differences in between these two powered and not powered versions? calculating algorithms? or is it just about saving the power of cpu? and what is story beyond sony -> sonnox?
anyway planning to buy UAD  cambridge seems to be pretty amazing tool
  "" |
|
|
|
gutter
Inactive User
Started Topics :
54
Posts :
3018
Posted : Mar 4, 2009 10:48
|
i dont think there are many differences or perceivable ones between powercore-native and cant understand why you say its piece of shit, it is totally uncolored and precise eq, you just have to use it where you find it useful, i personally use it for my bass with an inflator before/after, makes wonders 
uad is best eqs on the other hand, go for it
|
|
|
|
Fragletrollet
Fragletrollet
Started Topics :
111
Posts :
1748
Posted : Mar 4, 2009 11:14
|
|
TimeTraveller
IsraTrance Full Member
Started Topics :
80
Posts :
3207
Posted : Mar 4, 2009 12:45
|
|
I love oxford for its clearity that transparent decent way-my absolutely favourite.Waves is colouring a hell to sound.Sometimes for bass or kick i use it (waves).
https://soundcloud.com/shivagarden |
|
|
|
naga
IsraTrance Junior Member
Started Topics :
40
Posts :
204
Posted : Mar 4, 2009 22:52
|
thanks for your anwers =)
maybe waves eq's colour my music in the i'm looking at the moment.. maybe i'llchange my opinion in the future..
"" |
|
|
|
Elad
Tsabeat/Sattel Battle
Started Topics :
158
Posts :
5306
Posted : Mar 6, 2009 10:05
|
|
x-rayz
IsraTrance Junior Member
Started Topics :
11
Posts :
576
Posted : Mar 7, 2009 10:44
|
Quote:
|
On 2009-03-04 04:38:13, naga wrote:
So is there differences in between these two powered and not powered versions? calculating algorithms? or is it just about saving the power of cpu?
|
|
In general DSPs work much better cause theyre dedicated to the audio processing unlike the regular cpu, so theyre saving your cpu and calculating better results and they should sound better cause of that.. However I suppose algrhythms are identical for both powered and non-powered versions, its just the matter of final result of that algorhythm..
http://www.facebook.com/xrayzproductions
http://www.myspace.com/xrayzproductions |
|
|
|
vipal
IsraTrance Full Member
Started Topics :
123
Posts :
1397
Posted : Mar 12, 2009 04:48
|
used them both, no difference at all in sound as far as i could notice. the native is light on cpu, the powercore one takes quite some capacity from the dsp's. thats why i prefer the native version and keep the poco-capacity for the other tc-stuff.
|
|
|
|
assaf
IsraTrance Full Member
Started Topics :
66
Posts :
242
Posted : Mar 17, 2009 23:57
|
|
i use the magical inflator.. is there anyone who knows what exactly it does except of making everything sound better?
myspace.com/megaka |
|
|
|
vipal
IsraTrance Full Member
Started Topics :
123
Posts :
1397
Posted : Mar 18, 2009 06:38
|
|
when pushed its like a subtile distortion, tube emulation kind of thing, i remember an interview with one of the makers who also did not exactly knew what it exactly does but it sounded nice so he was ok with it. |
|
|
|
Colin OOOD
OOOD/Voice of Cod
Started Topics :
95
Posts :
5380
Posted : Mar 18, 2009 13:55
|
|
