| Author
|
Some opinions :)
|
frenik
Started Topics :
2
Posts :
6
Posted : Jan 20, 2009 05:57:36
|
|
mk47
Inactive User
Started Topics :
118
Posts :
4444
Posted : Jan 20, 2009 06:46
|
|
jizy
IsraTrance Full Member
Started Topics :
90
Posts :
1493
Posted : Jan 20, 2009 15:14
|
|
goood track,, but where are the subs?
|
|
|
frenik
Started Topics :
2
Posts :
6
Posted : Jan 20, 2009 15:26
|
Thanks man.
What u mean by the sub?
Sub Frequencies??
Guess my all mix isn't that good EQ, can you give me some tips?
 |
|
|
|
frenik
Started Topics :
2
Posts :
6
Posted : Jan 20, 2009 16:02
|
Guess i'm not in the right section my bad  |
|
|
|
jizy
IsraTrance Full Member
Started Topics :
90
Posts :
1493
Posted : Jan 20, 2009 16:33
|
|
erm, where have you hi passed the bass?
|
|
|
|
frenik
Started Topics :
2
Posts :
6
Posted : Jan 20, 2009 16:46
|
you mean if i had hi passed the Bass?
If it's that, i didn't, if it's about too much hipass in the bass,
It maybe can be,i've just down tuned the bass, and the Low Pass filter.
You think its maybe my lead's are too much mid-range?
Cheersss |
|
|
|
jizy
IsraTrance Full Member
Started Topics :
90
Posts :
1493
Posted : Jan 20, 2009 17:12
|
na i ment the whole track, dosnt seem to be any sub bass. put maxx bass on the main channel in stead of eqin stuff all over a gain, dont forget to tune it to the freqency(note) of your track.
or put the bass down an ocatve down like u said.
|
|
|
|
jizy
IsraTrance Full Member
Started Topics :
90
Posts :
1493
Posted : Jan 20, 2009 17:14
|
|
i might be wrong tho.. can anyone else varify that there isnt an awful lot of power energy becauuse of no bass? otherwise it would be good
|
|
|
|
PsyTiax
IsraTrance Junior Member
Started Topics :
26
Posts :
190
Posted : Jan 20, 2009 17:16
|
|
I would definately increase the BPM, but that's just me. |
|
|
|
frenik
Started Topics :
2
Posts :
6
Posted : Jan 20, 2009 17:44
|
Thanks guys about the feedback's..
You know its very hard for me to get some good dynamics in my tracks, cause i don't have any monitors, only a cheap 5.1 creative system.
But no problem, i am addicted
My home Studio is only one Remote Sl, i know i should get the monitors first, but what a he**, now i can tweakkkkk
I've made what you told me to.
It's a better version, i think the dynamics of the track is full diferent now, listen to it, and tell me what you think about it.
Thanks a lot again ppl..
http://www.4shared.com/file/81610043/3234cc67/NoName-02.html
|
|
|
|
jizy
IsraTrance Full Member
Started Topics :
90
Posts :
1493
Posted : Jan 20, 2009 17:47
|
|
ah rite well that explains it dude, gets sum monitors ul be well on ya way then
|
|
|
|
frenik
Started Topics :
2
Posts :
6
Posted : Jan 20, 2009 18:14
|
you bet
But you liked the track, i mean, the composition and the feeling of it?
|
|
|
|
jizy
IsraTrance Full Member
Started Topics :
90
Posts :
1493
Posted : Jan 20, 2009 18:44
|
|
compisition iz great mate keep at it
|
|
|
|
Chemogen
IsraTrance Full Member
Started Topics :
166
Posts :
713
Posted : Jan 21, 2009 12:13
|
Is it cool if I ask basically the same question here? Not so much on a composition point of view but more of a production sided one.
I really think there needs to be a sticky thread in E&MP for advice on more than just a kick and bassline but less than a full track. I feel more comfortable posting finished tracks in the New Tracks section for a more general critique, rather than a production sided one.
Anyways, I think this track shows off probably some of the best production I've been able to pull off, but I need a second opinion.
I've spent a lot of time on my bass, it's HP'd at 40hz with small cuts at around 60hz and 110hz. On my monitors it sounds great, in my friend's car (with his sub unplugged) it sounded pretty weak and - as has been mentioned here - really lowers the energy of the track.
This is about a three minute sample (but it goes through a lot of emotional and musical phases so it's not just a loop  )
http://www.fileden.com/files/2007/11/24/1603313/TwilightDynamicsSample.mp3
Thanks in advance |
|
|
|
