Trance Forum | Stats | Register | Search | Parties | Advertise | Login

There are 0 trance users currently browsing this page and 1 guest
Trance Forum » » Forum  Production & Music Making - rme latancy?
Share on facebook Share on twitter Share on StumbleUpon
Author

rme latancy?

Adi-Quantize
Quantize

Started Topics :  27
Posts :  216
Posted : Jul 2, 2004 03:31
hay there.

wanted to know on wich latancy should the rme hammerfull dsp should be on thanx!
Toxical(rotem)
Toxical

Started Topics :  24
Posts :  448
Posted : Jul 2, 2004 04:42
i like it in 6 MS ..           PsyTrance The sound track of our life...
http://www.toxicalmusic.com
http://www.myspace.com/toxicalmusic
http://www.myspace.com/rotemdoron (electro/minimal)
Yoake

Started Topics :  3
Posts :  100
Posted : Jul 2, 2004 11:59
i like in 8192 (186 MS)
but...as you like it ....just try
512 (12MS) is also working great !

very good sound card...Mazal Tov


Yoake.
Kaz
IsraTrance Full Member

Started Topics :  90
Posts :  2268
Posted : Jul 2, 2004 12:53
most people I've talked to who have RME cards work at around 5ms (or less) latencies.           http://www.myspace.com/Hooloovoo222
kukan-dub-lagan/ItaiTaiko
kukan-dub-lagan/ItaiTaiko

Started Topics :  144
Posts :  1728
Posted : Jul 2, 2004 14:51
you can work in the easy way for your computer(cpu),and when you records audio pick it up to the highest one...that will make the job for you..
most of the people work on 512
          Check out my music page - free music , new style and more :)
Colin OOOD
Moderator

Started Topics :  95
Posts :  5380
Posted : Jul 2, 2004 20:58
I use 3 ms if I can, and very rarely ever need to go above 12ms. 6ms runs just about everything absolutely perfectly.           Mastering - http://mastering.OOOD.net :: www.is.gd/mastering
OOOD 5th album 'You Think You Are' - www.is.gd/tobuyoood :: www.OOOD.net
www.facebook.com/OOOD.music :: www.soundcloud.com/oood
Contact for bookings/mastering - colin@oood.net
medir
Inactive User

Started Topics :  113
Posts :  1193
Posted : Jul 2, 2004 21:15
Quote:

On 2004-07-02 20:58, Colin OOOD wrote:
I use 3 ms if I can, and very rarely ever need to go above 12ms. 6ms runs just about everything absolutely perfectly.




...same here           experiment !
make it your motto day and night.
experiment,
and it will lead you to the light.
the apple on the top of the tree
is never too high to achieve,
so take an example from eve...
experiment !
deejayridoo
IsraTrance Junior Member

Started Topics :  14
Posts :  309
Posted : Jul 2, 2004 21:35
unless you have a dual cpu and raid harddisk, you´ll have to work at 23ms.
with a lot of plugz running i sometimes have to go up to 46ms. but this is acceptable, as long as the sound is great and there are no problemz...
of cours you can also go down to 6ms, but then i can only run very few things...
for recording handmade percussions you can switch of everything elese temporariliy, but that´s not how making music should be...
i must say that opnce again, all promises from the industry and its advertisements are fake.
rme is very good indeed, but far from being what one would expect after reading those corrupt articles in music magazines, but maybe pstrance is exceptionally demanding for cpu power and high end stuff (it´s very paradox to me that an alternative scene opposing to the commercial circuit uses such expensive material and, doing so, supports what it claims to oppose...
deejayridoo
IsraTrance Junior Member

Started Topics :  14
Posts :  309
Posted : Jul 2, 2004 21:39
oh, i forgot to mention what system i´m working at:
1,4 ghz amd athlon thunderbird processor, gigabyte mainboard, 512 mb ram
Colin OOOD
Moderator

Started Topics :  95
Posts :  5380
Posted : Jul 3, 2004 02:50
Quote:

On 2004-07-02 21:35, deejayridoo wrote:
unless you have a dual cpu and raid harddisk, you´ll have to work at 23ms.



Read the above posts, Ridoo... many of us run RME cards at 6ms with no problems. My normal setting is 3ms (using the PC as a VSTack host and a spectrum analyser). In fact, if I'm just using it to play live keyboards from the laptop I'll reduce the latency right down to 1ms; Abysnth or B4 or Korg Legacy all run perfectly well on my machine at 1ms as long as there's nothing else running. We probably have faster computers than you do, but it is possible.

The 'promises from the industry and its advertisements' are not fake; just because your machine is not powerful enough to get these low latencies doesn't negate the experiences of the rest of us.

And no, I don't have a 'dual CPU and RAID harddisk', I run a Multiface on a 2.2GHz P4 laptop with 512MB RAM.           Mastering - http://mastering.OOOD.net :: www.is.gd/mastering
OOOD 5th album 'You Think You Are' - www.is.gd/tobuyoood :: www.OOOD.net
www.facebook.com/OOOD.music :: www.soundcloud.com/oood
Contact for bookings/mastering - colin@oood.net
MoDu


Started Topics :  0
Posts :  36
Posted : Jul 27, 2004 03:17
deejayridoo , ever thought that you computer configuration is not very good? I run a PIII @ 933 and most of my tracks(Old skool goa style) I am able to run them with latency as low as 12 ms at their peak(so I can live-act over them).

Remeber, if your soundcard/drivers setup suck, go Asio4All drivers
br0d
IsraTrance Junior Member

Started Topics :  12
Posts :  355
Posted : Jul 27, 2004 05:39
i work at 3ms for recording and 6ms for mixing. but it depends on the computer. Watch the CPU utilization and adjust accordingly.
Trance Forum » » Forum  Production & Music Making - rme latancy?
 
Share on facebook Share on twitter Share on StumbleUpon


Copyright © 1997-2025 IsraTrance