| Author
|
Real Analog Bass Users...
|
ansolas
IsraTrance Full Member
Started Topics :
108
Posts :
977
Posted : Oct 16, 2006 14:27
|
Hello Friends,
Doepfer MS404 is also a hot pure analog synth!
It can Sound pretty ummm massive 
Love and Light |
|
|
AvS
Started Topics :
9
Posts :
464
Posted : Oct 17, 2006 13:18
|
I have an SH-101. Its not very modern sounding but imo thats not a bad thing. It sounds good. Might not be good at fast 16th note basss, unless you sample it, but why would you want to make the same bassline as anyone else anyway? 
dtd talked about free-running oscillators. I think most people today might find it anoying but it does ad some life. I have made an mp3 to show you how it sounds like:
www.steinholtz.dk/snd/101_16th.mp3
|
|
|
|
dtd
IsraTrance Junior Member
Started Topics :
17
Posts :
490
Posted : Oct 17, 2006 14:11
|
AvS: yes you're right, it definitely adds some life, it's great to have free running oscs.
 $ exp(j*pi) + 1 = 0. $ |
|
|
|
AvS
Started Topics :
9
Posts :
464
Posted : Oct 17, 2006 14:22
|
Yeah but as you know it can also be a bad thing. Especially for bass. Its not really a problem with the 101 because its only got one osc but if you use 2 osc synths you get constructive and destructive interference at different placess on each note so some notes will be fat and some thin. Its not always a problem though.
Would be kickass to have an analog where you can set the wave to start at the same point on each note-on event. For some reason this has never been done! Might not be possible or maybe its just because it kinda goes against the whole idea about analog synths. |
|
|
|
diskOtek
Entek
Started Topics :
70
Posts :
953
Posted : Oct 17, 2006 14:54
|
damn sh101 sounds so sweet!
|
|
|
|
dtd
IsraTrance Junior Member
Started Topics :
17
Posts :
490
Posted : Oct 17, 2006 15:13
|
jep, it can be a pain in the *%! for bass sounds
that's the cool thing with digital synthesis, you can choose between simulated "free running" oscs and the sample accurate triggered waveforms (e.g. on the virus synth with phaseinit)
$ exp(j*pi) + 1 = 0. $ |
|
|
|
sero|quence
Started Topics :
1
Posts :
10
Posted : Oct 20, 2006 11:47
|
I'm using a Waldorf Pulse.
It's a great sounding machine.
3~* SeroQuence 3~* |
|
|
|
gaianide
Started Topics :
1
Posts :
34
Posted : Oct 20, 2006 16:39
|
|
^^^I use a Waldorf Pulse too. They can be picked up for really cheap these days. Can't remember off the top of my head if it has (analog) VCOs but it definately has a lovely VCF. I sample that puppy. |
|
|
|
AvS
Started Topics :
9
Posts :
464
Posted : Oct 21, 2006 13:33
|
|
The Pulse has got DCO's. Not shure what kind of dco's. To day the confusion about DCO is pretty big. Many use the term DCO to describe a 100% digital osc, wich imo is not a dco. The term also covers real analog osc that a controlled by a digital clock like Juno 106. This is a real DCO. |
|
|
|
sero|quence
Started Topics :
1
Posts :
10
Posted : Oct 23, 2006 19:59
|
Pulse's OSC are real analog, but controlled by a digital clock as AvS said.
They are analog and they sound analog. Filter is analog too.
3~* SeroQuence 3~* |
|
|
|
slyman604
IsraTrance Junior Member
Started Topics :
11
Posts :
263
Posted : Oct 25, 2006 14:36
|
|
yea go with the Pulse, its the best of both worlds. i mean the pulse was kind of the vb-1 of its day. |
|
|
|
