| Author
|
nuendo 1.61.. cpu... hmmmzzz
|
fluor
IsraTrance Junior Member
Started Topics :
12
Posts :
62
Posted : Dec 11, 2003 01:33
|
hey!
i have the following pc:
AMD Athlon XP 2000
512 DDR (333)
Soltek SL-75FRN
ESI Waveterminal 192L
Win2000 Pro
i'm running nuendo 1.61 with the following vsts:
Halion 2.0 (6 samples: kick, c-hat, o-hat, snare, snare-rev, conga)
Tau Pro (+ Waves compressor, Eq, BassMaxx)
and a compressor & eq on the kick too.
and the cpu is at ~70%..
is this normal ???? anyone experienced anything similiar? i think that cubase sx 2 eats less cpu....
anyone can tell me his experience on Nuendo 2..? if it's better about performance, etc..
take care..
  this is how we are ought to see how sound really is.. |
|
|
|
Triton
Started Topics :
6
Posts :
171
Posted : Dec 11, 2003 05:01
|
|
fluor
IsraTrance Junior Member
Started Topics :
12
Posts :
62
Posted : Dec 12, 2003 00:07
|
i'm using the latest drivers.. and i'm using asio..
it's a nutcase :| hehe
i'm getting the new version soon... hope it's less cpu intensive than this one..
thx! 
plur
this is how we are ought to see how sound really is.. |
|
|
|
solipt1c
Soliptic
Started Topics :
9
Posts :
349
Posted : Dec 12, 2003 01:18
|
i've heard the newer one is actually slower and buggier... and 1.61 is great so i just stick with that til at least 2.2 or somethng
does the cpu stay at 70% or flicker erratically?
if it flickers, it could be denormal issues, i experienced this, and waves plugs are known culprits... if its solid...hmm... that does sound a little high, altho its hard to compare cos i haveno idea how much halion usually uses
for reference i have a 2.4GHz with 1GB ram, and to make the CPU hold steady at 70% i'd have to be running something like 2 z3ta, 1 vstation, 1 battery, 1 kontakt, 8 blood overdrive, 8 ohmboyz, 5 or 6 filtrators, 5 or 6 nuendochorus, 1 nuendoreverb, a few doubledelays, maybe the odd metaflanger or tc compressor in there too...
http://www.dartrecordings.co.uk/ |
|
|
|
fluor
IsraTrance Junior Member
Started Topics :
12
Posts :
62
Posted : Dec 13, 2003 00:00
|
thx for all ur help solipt1c! and the "and waves plugs are known culprits..." hehe
i removed the send effects (6, all waves plugs) and i went from 85-90% to 30% .
damn now that i was getting to be a waves only user.. would you know a good substitute for delays and reverbs? that isnt so cpu intensive..
once again thanks for all your attention solipt1c!
plur
this is how we are ought to see how sound really is.. |
|
|
|
solipt1c
Soliptic
Started Topics :
9
Posts :
349
Posted : Dec 13, 2003 02:32
|
for delay i just love the ohmboyz to bits... it can anything from very simple delays, to insane noisefuck madness. altho what i mostly use it for is beautiful dubby filtering panned delays which can turn any ultra-simple little noise into a sweet bubbling trancey texture or synth line... a bit of ohmboyz and reverb and i'm usually done 
as for reverb, i donno, i'm still not really happy with any that i have. mostly i use 2 sends - the nuendoreverb for a big 'cathedral' room, and the ultrafunk reverb for a smaller 'drum' room - and thats OK. but i still feel i could find better.
http://www.dartrecordings.co.uk/ |
|
|
|
Sequipa
Sequipa
Started Topics :
10
Posts :
77
Posted : Dec 13, 2003 08:20
|
honestly bro i think u should format and use windows xp
also if u have games installed get rid of them
direct x drivers can suck up some good memory
www.alchemyrecords.co.uk
www.killerloopmusic.com
DOES ET REALY EXIST??
dont ask me to post in your top10!!! |
|
|
|
