Author
|
NORMALIZING?
|
AcidForAll
Started Topics :
5
Posts :
135
Posted : Jul 1, 2008 19:20
|
Quote:
|
On 2008-07-01 19:19, Aker wrote:
well fuck off then
|
|
oki this is what i don't get or what?
is ur head that empty? can it be?
can be a lifeform with such a low iq?
seems so... |
|
|
Fragletrollet
Fragletrollet
Started Topics :
111
Posts :
1748
Posted : Jul 1, 2008 19:22
|
|
AcidForAll
Started Topics :
5
Posts :
135
Posted : Jul 1, 2008 19:24
|
Quote:
|
On 2008-07-01 18:38, Fragletrollet wrote:
what is the difference between normalizing a channel and pulling the fader down rather than only pulling the fader up? Except the extra processing-step ofcourse?
|
|
normalizing is should be the same as pulling the fader up till the loudest sound reaches the desired volume, mostly 0 or -0.1.. |
|
|
Aker
Inactive User
Started Topics :
0
Posts :
111
Posted : Jul 1, 2008 19:24
|
yeah.......if its too loud pull the fader down |
|
|
ThiagoNAKA
IsraTrance Full Member
Started Topics :
104
Posts :
1047
Posted : Jul 1, 2008 19:27
|
I usually do not normalize sounds so much... But I turn up the volume of each channel for boucing(I don´t care about mix at this point), cause I hate when u have the low level sounds.
Btw, I saw a BT video where he says:"First thing I do is to normalize all the sounds." Interesting and intriguing same time!
  LOADING... |
|
|
Aker
Inactive User
Started Topics :
0
Posts :
111
Posted : Jul 1, 2008 19:35
|
well then you best normalise then |
|
|
UnderTow
Started Topics :
9
Posts :
1448
Posted : Jul 1, 2008 20:31
|
Quote:
|
On 2008-07-01 18:38, Fragletrollet wrote:
what is the difference between normalizing a channel and pulling the fader down rather than only pulling the fader up? Except the extra processing-step ofcourse?
|
|
Why add the extra processing step? It has no benefit and a very small negative effect so why do it?
UnderTow |
|
|
UnderTow
Started Topics :
9
Posts :
1448
Posted : Jul 1, 2008 20:32
|
Quote:
|
On 2008-07-01 19:24, AcidForAll wrote:
normalizing is should be the same as pulling the fader up till the loudest sound reaches the desired volume, mostly 0 or -0.1..
|
|
It is an extra step. A step that is not needed if you just set all your levels correctly. Aker is right.
UnderTow
|
|
|
UnderTow
Started Topics :
9
Posts :
1448
Posted : Jul 1, 2008 20:35
|
Quote:
|
On 2008-07-01 19:20, AcidForAll wrote:
Quote:
|
On 2008-07-01 19:19, Aker wrote:
well fuck off then
|
|
oki this is what i don't get or what?
is ur head that empty? can it be?
can be a lifeform with such a low iq?
seems so...
|
|
Your very first post in this thread was an attack and insult to Aker. Well out of order. EDIT: Don't stoop to his level.
UnderTow |
|
|
Fragletrollet
Fragletrollet
Started Topics :
111
Posts :
1748
Posted : Jul 1, 2008 21:46
|
|
Medea
Aedem/Medea
Started Topics :
127
Posts :
1132
Posted : Jul 1, 2008 22:26
|
|
Upavas
Upavas
Started Topics :
150
Posts :
3315
Posted : Jul 1, 2008 23:55
|
|
Suloo
IsraTrance Full Member
Started Topics :
87
Posts :
2822
Posted : Jul 2, 2008 01:32
|
If you give your track to friends just for fun..then try normalizing...if it sounds better...btw.. a perfect mix des not need any mastering...so depends on you...
  -------......-------...-..-..-..-.-.-.-.- |
|
|
trollup
Inactive User
Started Topics :
0
Posts :
55
Posted : Jul 2, 2008 06:34
|
Quote:
|
On 2008-07-02 01:32, -=ZorK=- wrote:
If you give your track to friends just for fun..then try normalizing...if it sounds better...btw.. a perfect mix des not need any mastering...so depends on you...
|
|
do you have an example? |
|
|
Suloo
IsraTrance Full Member
Started Topics :
87
Posts :
2822
Posted : Jul 2, 2008 08:09
|
of a track that is perfect mixed and where is no need to master?no but i had mastering at school and thats what every professional mastering engineer says..
  -------......-------...-..-..-..-.-.-.-.- |
|
|