Author
|
my track....
|
binary_me
Started Topics :
6
Posts :
226
Posted : Apr 11, 2004 10:42
|
ok this is the first sample track ..only 3 mins...that i created in fruity loops 3 ...no fx used and no mastering ..cuz i didnot know bout it then ....plz give me ur reviews... it would very much help me ....
http://www.soundclick.com/bands/3/vikrutavatamusic.htm
  I'm tripping on this KILLER drug these days -HOOCH..... |
|
|
binary_me
Started Topics :
6
Posts :
226
Posted : Apr 11, 2004 11:32
|
and yes i did put in bass but i don't know why i cannot hear it ......
  I'm tripping on this KILLER drug these days -HOOCH..... |
|
|
binary_me
Started Topics :
6
Posts :
226
Posted : Apr 11, 2004 17:50
|
atleast someone tell me how it is ????
  I'm tripping on this KILLER drug these days -HOOCH..... |
|
|
bandarlog
Bandarlog
Started Topics :
44
Posts :
809
Posted : Apr 11, 2004 19:48
|
I suggest you learn a bit about eq, effects etc. so you can make a more balanced and finished song. |
|
|
ketzah
IsraTrance Junior Member
Started Topics :
18
Posts :
71
Posted : Apr 11, 2004 21:04
|
Try to do more and more tracks, listen to many songs, and how are them produced... (some music courses perhaps) |
|
|
PsyStream
Started Topics :
4
Posts :
13
Posted : Apr 15, 2004 07:59
|
You got pretty nice sound out of Fruity.
  Practice makes permanent.
PsyStream! |
|
|
PsYkO
Started Topics :
4
Posts :
5
Posted : Apr 15, 2004 19:02
|
yo dude,,, if u whant realy to make music,,,u have the first step,,,
try to include bassline to ur trax.. it will sound more reach,,
and second point in writing music is quality of sound... try other soft like cubase,, or reason
GOOD LUCK!) |
|
|
bandarlog
Bandarlog
Started Topics :
44
Posts :
809
Posted : Apr 15, 2004 23:04
|
Quote:
|
and second point in writing music is quality of sound... try other soft like cubase,, or reason |
|
Comm-ON! As if this track reaches the boundaries of Fruityloops! You can get FAR better sounding results out of fruityloops than this! And I'm not putting you down by saying this binary_me (you have good ideas but you just have to put them right in your music, a process we're all into, some in a more advanced state than others (duh...))
So I don't know how to interpretate Psystream remarks about 'you got pretty nice sound out of fruity'. I don't know wether he's giving binary_me a compliment, wether he's just dissing on fruityloops or wether he just doesn't know fruityloops by thinking that this sound quality is the best you can get out of it. Why should he be changing of program? I think that's a wrong advice you're giving here. It's like saying: "well, for the moment it isn't quite good enough but change to cubase and it will sound swell!", which I think is totally wrong! I'd say: see that you get a decent sound/structure/eq etc... out of fruityloops and then decide wether it suits you or wether you'd like to change to another program (why not Muzys for instance?).
And why is it that I get into arguments about fruityloops so often lately? (because it's been put down too much, that's why) |
|
|
PsYkO
Started Topics :
4
Posts :
5
Posted : Apr 16, 2004 06:37
|
are u joking)) hehe |
|
|
zooter
IsraTrance Junior Member
Started Topics :
44
Posts :
771
Posted : Apr 16, 2004 07:02
|
ahhhhhhhhhh....another fruity bashing session???? i sincerely hope fruity creators don't hear about this site |
|
|
Analog Xperience
IsraTrance Junior Member
Started Topics :
32
Posts :
326
Posted : Apr 16, 2004 11:56
|
yes ... because they will get all fashioned with so many ppl that like beginer sofyware .. i don't say that is a bad software .. only that is for learning .. but for sequencing and have a good structure in all track .. is bether get a real sequencer , like logic audio gold or platinum ... or even cubase sx 2 ..reason is to mekanik ,,,
but fruity is not something to put in the garbage .. we have 2 project in our coutry .. that with fruity .. they really make good stuff , and pretty balanced .. one overall nice work
so don't doubt of the kualitys oa the programs .. each one have something to win .
for me i would prefer logic audio platinum or gold like as usual
BOOMMM
and bandarlog .. nobody use a lot .. or they put down .. because they need to do it .. fruity sucks for big time O its good to learn .. no to make good music with it .. attention .. this is only my opinion don't take it with bad intention
stay well |
|
|
bandarlog
Bandarlog
Started Topics :
44
Posts :
809
Posted : Apr 16, 2004 15:28
|
Quote:
|
fruity sucks for big time |
|
OT: you know there's actually a whole community of producers (not psy, music for games) who think exactly the same way about cubase sx?
Anyway, wait and listen...that's my final word on it. I'm starting to feel like Don Quichote right now... |
|
|
AKAY
Started Topics :
1
Posts :
1
Posted : Apr 16, 2004 15:43
|
HI BInary
so...the track is to techno...not psy...a little bit synth sounds,this is ok...but your drums to rave...
and you need bassline...you must it bring to rolling...
i hope you understand me
bbest greetz
Akay |
|
|
binary_me
Started Topics :
6
Posts :
226
Posted : Apr 17, 2004 15:02
|
well thanks ppl ...but as i said i did out bass in the track ...but i guess its volume level must have been low hence couldn't hear it ....and i don't have the orignal now ...
and i guess fruity loops is a good software ...i have cubase sx 1.05 ..but i couldnot understand shit in it the first time i saw it ..so i keep using fruity loops cuz its very user friendly ....
once again thanx for the inputs ...i appreciate it very much...
|
|
|
saxopholus
Started Topics :
0
Posts :
79
Posted : Apr 17, 2004 20:19
|
umm well that's interesting music.... some good sounds, drums were not great I must say. my speakers have very good bass response and I heard no bassline. I would say FL cuts the mustard if you can get those sort of results on your first tune, but then I've never tried it. think about bringing your beats higher in the mix and not have those wacky synths take over the monitors
anyway if you want to learn about EQ see :
http://www.dnbscene.com/articles.php?mode=display&id=79
my bandmate hipnotic explains it well - helped me a lot.
Sax James.
www.dartrecordings.co.uk |
|
|