| Author
|
Mastering Question
|
Wize-art
Started Topics :
4
Posts :
7
Posted : Apr 13, 2014 22:27:51
|
I use fabfilter Pro-L to limit my tracks at the mastering stage.
The question would be:
Is there any way to get rid of inter sample peaks except for turning down the gain?
Or is there any way to prevent my tracks from inter sample peaking? |
|
|
jizy
IsraTrance Full Member
Started Topics :
90
Posts :
1493
Posted : Apr 13, 2014 23:50
|
aslong as it sounds like...woooooowwwww omg omg OMG O MY F'ING GOD this sounds greaaaat!
so good a sound that it buys its way in to your dreams
then who cares 
But in a world of what does care , what about your mix? how are the peaks there? are things compressed right? is there saturation on things that """JUMP OUTTT""" etc etc...
just enjoy your mix and enjoy mixing to the best you can man.
leav the mastering to the equips wiser god with fresh ears
people in bands dont even mix let alone attempt to master their own tunes without sum hardcore analog and some nice chain.
al i can say is make great tunes and mix is the best u can.. dont settle for mud and think mastering is the key...
then again i could b wrong.. |
|
|
|
Colin OOOD
Moderator
Started Topics :
95
Posts :
5380
Posted : Apr 14, 2014 05:57
|
|
jizy
IsraTrance Full Member
Started Topics :
90
Posts :
1493
Posted : Apr 14, 2014 06:25
|
must of misunderstoood it.....
my point was people think they can master wen they cant even mix efficiently,its quite comical really..and to be encouraging it is no better.
owel,liv n let liv as they say
shoulda just used the term.."if i wanted to make my track louder b4 mastering bob katz
|
|
|
|
Babaluma
IsraTrance Junior Member
Started Topics :
18
Posts :
729
Posted : Apr 14, 2014 10:26
|
|
PoM
IsraTrance Full Member
Started Topics :
162
Posts :
8087
Posted : Apr 15, 2014 13:20
|
|
i find that often isp like on oxford or ozone or using oversampling (maybe that what all does? dunno) is not as transparent as leaving the isp , best solution for would be not as loud, leave a little headroom to minimize isp. |
|
|
|
Babaluma
IsraTrance Junior Member
Started Topics :
18
Posts :
729
Posted : Apr 16, 2014 10:29
|
I've A/B tested OS on/off with Elephant hundreds of times, and it's transparent to me, so I always have it on with single rates (44.1 or 48Khz). I used to think it changed things a bit in the high end (as I'd read many people claim that), but when I blind A/Bed I really couldn't tell the difference, so it was probably just bias.
For double/quadruple rate (88.2 and above etc.) it's not always necessary.
 http://hermetechmastering.com : http://www.discogs.com/artist/Gregg+Janman : http://soundcloud.com/babaluma |
|
|
|
PoM
IsraTrance Full Member
Started Topics :
162
Posts :
8087
Posted : Apr 16, 2014 14:13
|
did some test long ago with elephant oversampling now their up/downsampling is probably a lot better.
how do you like the new version btw ? |
|
|
|
Babaluma
IsraTrance Junior Member
Started Topics :
18
Posts :
729
Posted : Apr 17, 2014 11:26
|
|
frisbeehead
IsraTrance Junior Member
Started Topics :
10
Posts :
1352
Posted : Apr 17, 2014 16:10
|
Quote:
|
On 2014-04-17 11:26, Babaluma wrote:
Love it! New EL-4 algorithm is the most transparent yet, and the EVAL switch allows automatic volume matched A/Bs in combination with the BYPASS.
|
|
+1 priceless... |
|
|
|
