| Author
|
Just what Cubase and Logic do that I cant do in Reason??
|
ben
IsraTrance Junior Member
Started Topics :
16
Posts :
108
Posted : Feb 23, 2003 20:09
|
to bilbo
About the EQ com'on look at the Eq in reason, it is really small, you can barely hear any difference when you tweak the parameters. Compare that with the waves Eq in Logic... If reason was that good more big bands would be using it, but when you read interviews bands always work with cubase or logic, and there must be a reason for that don't you think??
By the way have you ever used logic or cubase and compared withg reason? If not i suggest you give it a try.. |
|
|
Pavel
Troll
Started Topics :
313
Posts :
8649
Posted : Feb 23, 2003 22:51
|
Quote:
|
On 2003-02-23 02:08, feiges wrote:
Space Ninja!!
THAT is what I'm lookin 4!!! 
THANX!!! THANX A LOT!!!
Now I have some interesting readings to do!! See ya next week!! (And probably with lots of less stupid questions!!!) 
|
|
No problem Baba good luck
 Everyone in the world is doing something without me |
|
|
|
Pavel
Troll
Started Topics :
313
Posts :
8649
Posted : Feb 23, 2003 23:01
|
Quote:
|
On 2003-02-23 19:50, SuperGlue wrote:
cubase more pro coz
1.it shows u wave forms of files and u can easy edit them !!
2.cubase better for sound monitoring/analysing
............
3.cubase supports hardware work same as logic and fruity !!!
feiges all pro and semi pro appys do the same
things in music construction but the difference is in which kind of way !!!
sorry that i changed subject !
|
|
Mr. Glue, Cubase is more powerful than Reason will ever be for several reasons:
1. Reasons' developers have no plans to compete with Steinbergs' leading software simply because their developers came from world of Syntesizing (One of their leading programmers worked for Clavia). They have no intentions to include VST support or Audio/Recording tools.
http://home.t-online.de/home/pegasus-wtal/interview/interview.htm
2. You can't put behind Steinberg's expertise that was earned in years in the field of software sequencers. They started in those happy Atari days.
3. The application you are using doesn't make you a pro or semi pro. It's all in your mind. Cosma R.I.P. made his first album on PC only. So as Talamasca, Krumelur and the list goes on.
That's all, i think.
Everyone in the world is doing something without me |
|
|
|
Zimbah
Started Topics :
3
Posts :
41
Posted : Feb 24, 2003 10:44
|
I am not looking in to getting in a big discussion here, which only results in a "fight" on which is better, however i'd like to give you all my opinions:
First of all, Reason is good. But, only as a complement imho. I use Cubase for sequensing, and reason via rewire. I find it very flexible, because i can use VSTi's and effects which i can not use in reason alone. The Eq's in reason is definately nothing to be proud of, it stinks, even cubase's Eq's i am not satisfied with. The best EQ i have used is Filterbank for protools.
Actually i prefer working with protools when it comes to mixing, you have such great overview, and the automation!!!! It's excellent. If the day comes when they implement a vst engine in protools i'd be very happy. That way you could use the flexibility of both platforms, have VSTi's in protools, that would be the bomb.
As i said, reason is avery good complement, and you should not underestemate it's abilitys, but using it alone as a production tool is not recomended.
Ok, this is my cupple of cent's to it all, i hope it brings some light to y'all :-D
Be good!
Zimbah (Ratata-taaa) |
|
|
|
Trip-
IsraTrance Team
Started Topics :
101
Posts :
3239
Posted : Feb 24, 2003 19:05
|
Don't you think TDM is slightly better than VSTi? 
and just to enlarge yer words zimbah - Reason is not a whole production kit program. I know it looks that way - but no.
Crackling universes dive into their own neverending crackle...
AgalactiA |
|
|
|
feiges
IsraTrance Junior Member
Started Topics :
16
Posts :
76
Posted : Feb 24, 2003 19:14
|
Quote:
|
On 2003-02-24 19:05, Trip- wrote:
Don't you think TDM is slightly better than VSTi?
|
|
what is TDM?? and why is it better than VSTi?? and which appz work with TDM??
-- i think I came to the right place to know all this stuff!! --
"These psychedelic substances cause hysterical psychoses in people who have not taken them..." T.L. |
|
|
|
Trip-
IsraTrance Team
Started Topics :
101
Posts :
3239
Posted : Feb 24, 2003 19:16
|
TDM is protools standard mate.
Crackling universes dive into their own neverending crackle...
AgalactiA |
|
|
|
C3PO
IsraTrance Junior Member
Started Topics :
29
Posts :
510
Posted : Feb 24, 2003 20:44
|
I think that Reason can be much better than Cubase ,
Logic or ProTools, for those ppl who need software based
groovebox , Reason it's defenetly one of the best tools
for that . From professional point of view Reason it's
the ultimate "real studio emulation" for beginners who
don't know how real studio works and where to start .
Ofcourse it's possible to "make tracks" with it, it just
depends on the way u work . I don't believe that in near
future the big studios who make big money out of music
production will sell out they'r SSL desks, valve units, etc...
and will move to Reason or Fruity because it's possible
to "make tracks" with it. I don't shure how can be
possible to record an artist into Reason . . .
Another point is that if someone works with Reason and
feel comfortable with the results there is no reason
moving to Cubase , defenetly no reason . |
|
|
|
Zimbah
Started Topics :
3
Posts :
41
Posted : Feb 24, 2003 22:30
|
|
Trip- > Ofcourse TDM is better quality and all, that's one of the reasons i prefer protools. However, implementing VST into protools would be the peak of flexibility imo.
Zimbah (Ratata-taaa) |
|
|
|
C3PO
IsraTrance Junior Member
Started Topics :
29
Posts :
510
Posted : Feb 25, 2003 00:12
|
|
what's better quality in TDM is the hardware that it runs on. |
|
|
|
