| Author
|
is it all realy frequencies ?
|
Elad
Tsabeat/Sattel Battle
Started Topics :
158
Posts :
5306
Posted : Apr 24, 2007 17:12
|
well.. there it goes..
u can have same spectrum analize , and yet one sound is more beautiful (in the eye of beholder) then the other.
*true or false ?
*would you rather sound that fit your spectrum anal rather then your ear ?
  www.sattelbattle.com
http://yoavweinberg.weebly.com/ |
|
|
|
faxinadu
Faxi Nadu / Elmooht
Started Topics :
282
Posts :
3394
Posted : Apr 24, 2007 17:29
|
|
galactic monkey
Galactic Monkey
Started Topics :
84
Posts :
975
Posted : Apr 24, 2007 17:38
|
balance all the way bro!!!
peace |
|
|
|
zafer
IsraTrance Full Member
Started Topics :
65
Posts :
290
Posted : Apr 24, 2007 20:16
|
bout analyzers:
anyone can tell me why i cut under ,let's say, 50hz my kick with many eq's one after another and still inspector shows me a graphical peak going down till the bottom (=10hz) ???
any other analyzer to suggest??
thx
|
|
|
|
Elad
Tsabeat/Sattel Battle
Started Topics :
158
Posts :
5306
Posted : Apr 24, 2007 20:52
|
u cut with diffrent filters.
12db 24db 36db or 48db
u can use Q10 which alow you to have as much 12db filters.. have several in diffrent points , i found get much more natural sound then use req6 with one straight 36db filter.
so , u actualy rather to change something that sounds good becuase of analisis ????
how do you choose beween 2 snares that have same req range ? by ear i hope .. ?? www.sattelbattle.com
http://yoavweinberg.weebly.com/ |
|
|
|
orange
Fat Data
Started Topics :
154
Posts :
3918
Posted : Apr 24, 2007 21:05
|
|
ThiagoNAKA
IsraTrance Full Member
Started Topics :
104
Posts :
1047
Posted : Apr 25, 2007 02:22
|
Quote:
|
On 2007-04-24 20:16, zafer wrote:
bout analyzers:
anyone can tell me why i cut under ,let's say, 50hz my kick with many eq's one after another and still inspector shows me a graphical peak going down till the bottom (=10hz) ???
any other analyzer to suggest??
thx
|
|
Don´t know if I´m talking shit... But that´s what comes to me:
I guess all real time analizers uses the famous FFT(Fast Fourier Transform) to read audio signals. And if I´m not mistaken, FFT is an aprox. of another "transform", the Fourier Transform. I remember from school days that FFT is way easier to implement for real time purpouses.
For example: FFT uses a pre-determined lenght of audio to analyze. With too fast sample, maybe FFT will not determine the low frequncies...
But I know there´re ppl here to explain better! 
I tried some analizers... I can say 2 as my prefered options:
1)Waves PAZ Analizer: looks good and trustable. Simple. It says it uses a method "similar by the ear"... They say PAZ shows what u hear...
2)Nugen Audio Visualizer: very complete analizer. BUt here I fell the imprecision of the FFT... U need to "tweak" some options, to get a trustable visual result. FOr example, sometimes u will see a kick loop changing the spectrum... BUt maybe that´s why I tend to trust this plugin.
LOADING... |
|
|
|
Colin OOOD
Moderator
Started Topics :
95
Posts :
5380
Posted : Apr 25, 2007 03:53
|
|
UnderTow
Started Topics :
9
Posts :
1448
Posted : Apr 25, 2007 04:00
|
SMS: You are right about the FFT bucket sizes but it also has to do with the fact that filters just roll off frequencies below (or above) a certain point. They don't cut absolutely!
I'm not a big fan of PAZ. I much prefer Voxengo SPAN (which btw is a free download from the Voxengo site).
UnderTow |
|
|
|
faxinadu
Faxi Nadu / Elmooht
Started Topics :
282
Posts :
3394
Posted : Apr 25, 2007 08:39
|
|
Trip-
IsraTrance Team
Started Topics :
101
Posts :
3239
Posted : Apr 25, 2007 09:51
|
Quote:
|
On 2007-04-24 17:12, tsabeat wrote:
*would you rather sound that fit your spectrum anal rather then your ear ?
|
|
anal or through the ear - as long as I'm happy with the results!
Crackling universes dive into their own neverending crackle...
AgalactiA |
|
|
|
