Trance Forum | Stats | Register | Search | Parties | Advertise | Login

There are 0 trance users currently browsing this page
Trance Forum » » Forum  Equipment - Intel Q6600 vs Q9550
Share on facebook Share on twitter Share on StumbleUpon
Author

Intel Q6600 vs Q9550

Get-a-fix
Getafix

Started Topics :  147
Posts :  1441
Posted : Feb 24, 2009 17:53:28
Hi guys,

Well i'm thinking of upgrading from my existing Core 2 Quad Q6600 to a Q9550. The Q9550 will have a faster clock, FSB & more cache & it will also consume less power & run cooler.

I'm just wondering if anyone has tested these two & if you think the upgrade is worth it. I'll be spending roughly $140 to upgrade after selling my existing processor.

Ideally i would upgrade to Corei7 but then i'd have to get a new motherboard & DDR3 ram, both are quite expensive at the moment.

The Q6600 is getting phased out soon by Intel, hence i want something more future proof & a little extra performance can't hurt.           http://www.soundcloud.com/getafixmusic
vegetal
Vegetal/Peacespect

Started Topics :  19
Posts :  1055
Posted : Feb 24, 2009 22:16
http://www.hardwarezone.com/articles/view.php?id=2521&cid=2&pg=1 i say its a go on that one           Demand recognition for the Armenian genocide 1915
http://www.devilsmindrecords.org/
http://www.myspace.com/vegetalmusic
http://www.checkpoint-music.com/
Get-a-fix
Getafix

Started Topics :  147
Posts :  1441
Posted : Feb 25, 2009 16:36
Thanks for the link, seems like the upgrade should be worth it.           http://www.soundcloud.com/getafixmusic
XuN
IsraTrance Full Member

Started Topics :  84
Posts :  499
Posted : Feb 27, 2009 00:58
What harddrive do you have?

I have the Q6600, and I only seem to have problems with my HDD being a bottleneck...           www.xun.dk / myspace.com/xundk
!!PLUR!!
Get-a-fix
Getafix

Started Topics :  147
Posts :  1441
Posted : Feb 27, 2009 09:33
I have a Seagate 7200RPM HDD, i never thought that it would slow the system down though.

Another reason for upgrading is because i want to work at lower latencies. The Q6600 sometimes chokes on large projects at low buffer settings.           http://www.soundcloud.com/getafixmusic
index
IsraTrance Junior Member

Started Topics :  36
Posts :  548
Posted : Mar 9, 2009 10:56
get the 45 nm cpu           HTTP://www.decadancerecords.it/audioplug
vegetal
Vegetal/Peacespect

Started Topics :  19
Posts :  1055
Posted : Mar 9, 2009 22:02
Quote:

On 2009-02-27 00:58, XuN wrote:
What harddrive do you have?

I have the Q6600, and I only seem to have problems with my HDD being a bottleneck...



The HD will always be the bottleneck since its the only mechanical device. If you want to improve it Get a SSD-disk!           Demand recognition for the Armenian genocide 1915
http://www.devilsmindrecords.org/
http://www.myspace.com/vegetalmusic
http://www.checkpoint-music.com/
x-rayz
IsraTrance Junior Member

Started Topics :  11
Posts :  576
Posted : Mar 9, 2009 23:38
Quote:

On 2009-02-27 09:33, Get-a-fix wrote:
Another reason for upgrading is because i want to work at lower latencies. The Q6600 sometimes chokes on large projects at low buffer settings.


Quote:
Ableton support
Note that more cores will also have a negative side-effect on the latency of your soundcard. That's because the computer needs to synchronize the audio signals from all cores which takes some extra time. The latency will not be significantly higher, but people who need an ultra-low latency system (e.g. a live rig which monitors audio signals through the software in realtime), should ideally avoid too many cores and rather get less, but very powerful cores.

          http://www.facebook.com/xrayzproductions
http://www.myspace.com/xrayzproductions
Becktrank
IsraTrance Junior Member

Started Topics :  38
Posts :  537
Posted : Mar 10, 2009 17:07
what will be better a 250gb 7,200 rpm hd or a 500gb 5,400rpm?
          ``We shall not cease from exploration - And the end of all our exploring - Will be to arrive where we started - And know the place for the first time.``

bahia
XuN
IsraTrance Full Member

Started Topics :  84
Posts :  499
Posted : Mar 10, 2009 17:11
Quote:

On 2009-03-10 17:07, becktrank wrote:
what will be better a 250gb 7,200 rpm hd or a 500gb 5,400rpm?




I would go for a WD VelociRaptor WD3000HLFS
300 GB . 10000 RPM... If you want your samples and daw to respond fast, you need fast reading...           www.xun.dk / myspace.com/xundk
!!PLUR!!
x-rayz
IsraTrance Junior Member

Started Topics :  11
Posts :  576
Posted : Mar 10, 2009 17:40
Quote:

On 2009-03-10 17:07, becktrank wrote:
what will be better a 250gb 7,200 rpm hd or a 500gb 5,400rpm?


it will be similar..
larger the disk = higher density, meaning faster access time - reading...           http://www.facebook.com/xrayzproductions
http://www.myspace.com/xrayzproductions
XuN
IsraTrance Full Member

Started Topics :  84
Posts :  499
Posted : Mar 14, 2009 14:51






The way to go...           www.xun.dk / myspace.com/xundk
!!PLUR!!
vegetal
Vegetal/Peacespect

Started Topics :  19
Posts :  1055
Posted : Mar 14, 2009 20:17
Quote:

On 2009-03-10 17:11, XuN wrote:
Quote:

On 2009-03-10 17:07, becktrank wrote:
what will be better a 250gb 7,200 rpm hd or a 500gb 5,400rpm?




I would go for a WD VelociRaptor WD3000HLFS
300 GB . 10000 RPM... If you want your samples and daw to respond fast, you need fast reading...



As you posted later here, i say if you have the money go for SSD disks instead           Demand recognition for the Armenian genocide 1915
http://www.devilsmindrecords.org/
http://www.myspace.com/vegetalmusic
http://www.checkpoint-music.com/
Trance Forum » » Forum  Equipment - Intel Q6600 vs Q9550
 
Share on facebook Share on twitter Share on StumbleUpon


Copyright © 1997-2025 IsraTrance