| Author
|
Genelec, Dynaudio or Mackie?
|
*..*
Started Topics :
2
Posts :
33
Posted : Dec 12, 2006 02:40
|
high everybody....
Im about to buy a couple of monitors... But Im still unsure about what to buy. I want monitors that can develop good punchy bass, crystal clear audio and hi fidelity... MY studio room is small one. COuld you help me to decide the best option please? You can recomend other option too please. and tell me why =D
GENELECS 8040 or 8030
DYNAUDIO BM5 or BM6
MACKIE HR 824
thanks for your time!!
  melt your brain!!! otherwise is not psychedelic experience... |
|
|
|
Serag
IsraTrance Junior Member
Started Topics :
34
Posts :
351
Posted : Dec 12, 2006 03:34
|
|
ai pinche necio GENELEC!!!! |
|
|
|
orange
Fat Data
Started Topics :
154
Posts :
3918
Posted : Dec 12, 2006 04:09
|
if u have a small room forget the mackie 824 so u have the dynaudio bm5a that are fine for small rooms and the genelec (both ok 8040 better with the 6,5inch woofer)
its a matter of listening both and choose who u like more cos they are both great monitors!
orange
http://www.landmark-recordings.com/
http://soundcloud.com/kymamusic |
|
|
|
Mike A
Subra
Started Topics :
185
Posts :
3954
Posted : Dec 12, 2006 04:30
|
some people will die for a bm6a.
also try p11 from adam.
|
|
|
|
Trip-
IsraTrance Team
Started Topics :
101
Posts :
3239
Posted : Dec 12, 2006 09:01
|
every monitor at this price range has its own signature.
I'd personally would prefer Genelecs, for the sound I'd like to hear and acomplish.
Many people would choose dynaudio instead for another certain sound signature.
Crackling universes dive into their own neverending crackle...
AgalactiA |
|
|
|
0hz
IsraTrance Junior Member
Started Topics :
10
Posts :
261
Posted : Dec 12, 2006 10:23
|
|
Alex Roudos
IsraTrance Junior Member
Started Topics :
33
Posts :
411
Posted : Dec 12, 2006 10:28
|
|
Mackie HR-624, perfect for small to medium size rooms with incredible volume, accuracy and detail. In fact they are better from their big brother the 824.
A friend told me once that the biggest mistake we make is that we believe we live, when in reality we are sleeping in the waiting room of life. |
|
|
|
shachar
Basic
Started Topics :
13
Posts :
402
Posted : Dec 12, 2006 11:14
|
|
dynaudio is my choise |
|
|
|
PsytillIdie
Started Topics :
0
Posts :
4
Posted : Dec 12, 2006 21:30
|
Mackie Hr824's are solid monitors, though some complain about the price. Bass response is quite nice. As far as "Flat Response" goes, I doubt many monitors are truly flat. The EQ response curve that comes with my Mackies has up to +/- 3db dips up and down the spectrum all over the place.
Consider the monitors all your fav. artists use, that should help cement your decision. (Would Posford lie?)
As for "
Posted by : Alex Roudos
Posted on : 2006-12-12 10:28 Mackie HR-624, perfect for small to medium size rooms with incredible volume, accuracy and detail. In fact they are better from their big brother the 824."
I think I missed the lecture where lower-end speakers were considered better than their higher-end counterparts. ;] Are you saying that compared to the price of the Hr824's, they are a better choice?
|
|
|
|
Alex Roudos
IsraTrance Junior Member
Started Topics :
33
Posts :
411
Posted : Dec 12, 2006 22:52
|
@ PsytillIdie
All i'm saying is that the 624s as the next model from the 824s, have improved and more accurate mid-range(one of the major complaints for the 824s - but not meaning at all it was not good) and better stereo image.
I was about to buy the 824s, but i spent 2 weeks before that, reading everything i could find regarding them. Everyone, from users to magazines, agreed on what i mentioned above(i didn't make them up or by listening to both of them) and that the 624s would be a more preferred solution for small to medium size studios, considering the sound quality, the price and the volume they can offer. If you search you'll find all the relative info ;]
Unless there is big enough space and the 824s are set far from the walls, the low cut should be set at 47hz, which is almost the same response with 624s. And this was another factor that made me go for the 624s.
And by the way, the HR-626 are way much better than both of the other two.
A friend told me once that the biggest mistake we make is that we believe we live, when in reality we are sleeping in the waiting room of life. |
|
|
|
orange
Fat Data
Started Topics :
154
Posts :
3918
Posted : Dec 13, 2006 00:18
|
i found the 624 have very uncontrollable low freq i was working with them for about 2 months every day and im pretty confident on my opinion! indeed the mids and highs are very good but those low was very unstable!
thats the reason i chose dynaudio bm5a but also genelecs were very good!
i cant say that the 624 are bad in any way but i would trust mixing on the others more easily!
orange
http://www.landmark-recordings.com/
http://soundcloud.com/kymamusic |
|
|
|
Elad
Tsabeat/Sattel Battle
Started Topics :
158
Posts :
5306
Posted : Dec 13, 2006 01:39
|
|
index
IsraTrance Junior Member
Started Topics :
36
Posts :
548
Posted : Dec 13, 2006 14:43
|
|
kajola
Kajola
Started Topics :
74
Posts :
498
Posted : Dec 13, 2006 18:27
|
|
orange
Fat Data
Started Topics :
154
Posts :
3918
Posted : Dec 13, 2006 19:11
|
|
