| Author
|
Freq - Key Table
|
FluoSamsara (Oxygen)
IsraTrance Full Member
Started Topics :
84
Posts :
1164
Posted : Mar 30, 2004 19:44
|
|
Hi, anyone knows where I can get a table in the net saying the frequencies for each key? (like C1-XXHz) ?? |
|
|
Pavel
Troll
Started Topics :
313
Posts :
8649
Posted : Mar 30, 2004 19:45
|
|
WAVELOGIX
Wavelogix
Started Topics :
136
Posts :
1214
Posted : Mar 30, 2004 21:11
|
so does this help with doing better eq'uing than before ????
im surely giving this a try 2night 
|
|
|
|
Triptocoma
Inactive User
Started Topics :
5
Posts :
296
Posted : Mar 30, 2004 21:46
|
Global Trance Network
of course, when you know the root frequency you know where the actions is  |
|
|
|
Amygdala
Amygdala
Started Topics :
12
Posts :
175
Posted : Mar 30, 2004 22:06
|
That is not be entirely true... Some sounds may have a richer energy in the spectrum in the partials - not the base frequency... Indeed, if you have three partials at say 200, 300, 400 Hz, the ear will percieve the note as 100 Hz - even if that frequency is not present... - Because this is the base frequency with the 2nd, 3rd, and 4th partial standing out...
What you probably want to do, is to analyze the sound for harmonic content, and then EQ on that basis instead. Sort of a spectral expander if those exist...
Happy EQ'ing
- Amygdala
|
|
|
|
motorik
IsraTrance Junior Member
Started Topics :
14
Posts :
153
Posted : Mar 30, 2004 23:10
|
If it's for equing than Why not use our ears to hear the best EQ for a certain sound???
After all it's all about what we hear and what sounds better, doesn't it!!!!?
salute
motorik
 "one good thing about music is when it hits you , you feel no pain" - Bob Marley |
|
|
|
Triptocoma
Inactive User
Started Topics :
5
Posts :
296
Posted : Mar 30, 2004 23:15
|
Amygdala - thanks for the explanation!
i knew i should have explaind my self a little better.. but you did a better job, some stuff you should leave for the pros 
If Eqing was that simple where would the fun be |
|
|
|
billy ambulance
IsraTrance Junior Member
Started Topics :
43
Posts :
560
Posted : Mar 30, 2004 23:39
|
Quote:
|
On 2004-03-30 23:10, motorik wrote:
If it's for equing than Why not use our ears to hear the best EQ for a certain sound???
After all it's all about what we hear and what sounds better, doesn't it!!!!?
|
|
very wise words! my friend
and our ears need training too..
check out! www.soundclick.com/spasm |
|
|
|
Amygdala
Amygdala
Started Topics :
12
Posts :
175
Posted : Mar 31, 2004 09:27
|
"some stuff you should leave for the pros" - then I should just keep quite
- Actually, I'm writing my master thesis in computer science about something like this. I have been searching for some cool applications for a program I'm writing, and this actually seems like a splendid idea - thank for the insp.
If any of you run SuperCollider3 I will have a neat plugin for this in a couple of days - then you won't need to analyze frequency content yourself, just turn a knob up or down
- Amygdala |
|
|
|
