wizanda
IsraTrance Junior Member
Started Topics :
24
Posts :
283
Posted : Jul 25, 2010 11:40
Thank you for the constructive advice, that's my problem though, not solution; percussionist, play guitar, keyboard and most instruments, which is why struggle so much writing psy... Have a habit of playing complete unique tracks that sound classic, which doesn't translate easily into short phrases; so beginning to learn a new technique of minimizing every sound, yet that's still only partially there.
Ask me to play psy on a djembe in a rave and can do that, yet ask me to translate that into a mathematical formula and it discombobulates me for years.
Also if you listen to my tracks, you will see that unable to imitate, rather its all created translated innovated related. www.wizanda.comwww.soundcloud.com/wizanda
wizanda
IsraTrance Junior Member
Started Topics :
24
Posts :
283
Posted : Jul 27, 2010 11:21
I love FL Studio, and a few 'purists' out there that I know have brought up this 'toy' thing about it. The only thing that I can think of, is that FL Studio is a $100 program, whereas Cubase is $479. What does this say? Maybe there is some better programming architecture behind it. But my question has been: Does it affect the sound? At the end of the day, when you render a song out, to its highest settings, will it be any different than that being rendered through Cubase? I would suspect, based on the cost of developing these programs, that yeah.. there might be a difference. But so far I don't notice it quite much. Anybody have more info on this?
Another thing, when I used to work at a video game company, I learned tons from the sound people there. Actual sound engineers, and people that develop sound professionally for games... they always said: "Whatever DAW you use, use the one you feel the most comfortable in. There is no sound difference."
And I always thought about this, but then I keep hearing this "toy" comment. Maybe it's more of an ego thing? FL Studio DOES look more simple, it doesn't look as "techy" as cubase, but I've found that simplicity to be especially what I need, especially when it comes to navigating a song that keeps growing and growing. Maybe there are users that feel silly using that program, based on the UI, so they go for Cubase; hence the "toy" comment.
I have considered composing in FL Studio, and then exporting midi out and then doing all the masterization and detailing in cubase, just to see how it sounds. But so far, I am more of a composer, once I like the structure of a song, I'm happy with it. And purists can suck it! LOL kinda kidding there... I do love a good sounding song, but masterization and that kind of things is definitely not my strength yet.
wizanda
IsraTrance Junior Member
Started Topics :
24
Posts :
283
Posted : Jul 30, 2010 02:52
There are conversations on the ImageLine forum showing posts from across the web, where it proves there is no difference in sound quality.
FL-Studio is $299 for the Signature version; yet at the moment all plug-ins are on sale until august, so its even cheaper. www.wizanda.comwww.soundcloud.com/wizanda
psilozion
Started Topics :
3
Posts :
19
Posted : Aug 2, 2010 23:32
This one is made in FL studio the bass is made with Vb1, EQ and multiband compressor, I just twist on the low and middle until i have a sound which i like.
let me know what you think
wizanda
IsraTrance Junior Member
Started Topics :
24
Posts :
283
Posted : Aug 3, 2010 12:01
aXis
IsraTrance Full Member
Started Topics :
116
Posts :
2562
Posted : Aug 3, 2010 15:21
1 million artists do not sidechain their basss... u dont need to too.
have u tried writing music wit all u know atm ? cos thats the general way i went abt it
wizanda
IsraTrance Junior Member
Started Topics :
24
Posts :
283
Posted : Aug 3, 2010 15:39
Learned allot and found many techniques from projects and tried writing some; yet you know when something puts a spanner into your thinking, mines been finding a truly quality track to analyze, like analyzing Mozart's scores to realize trance spacial field dynamics. There is always more to learn and each project helps build a foundation, so we don't all sound the same on just trying to understand the basics. www.wizanda.comwww.soundcloud.com/wizanda
Urucubaca
IsraTrance Junior Member
Started Topics :
13
Posts :
51
Posted : Aug 6, 2010 16:14
wizanda
IsraTrance Junior Member
Started Topics :
24
Posts :
283
Posted : Aug 6, 2010 16:27
Thank you, have tried most of your songs and great resource. Added your "High Away" track, as could play it without additional plug-ins. www.wizanda.comwww.soundcloud.com/wizanda
Bosque Sub Zinho
IsraTrance Junior Member
Started Topics :
16
Posts :
113
Posted : Aug 11, 2010 18:30
last one not good mastering must edit it..!!
ALL FRUITY LOOPS 9, with full automation, plugins etc...!!
So, u can comment on Fruity now..!! Cheers..
Bosque Sub Zinho
IsraTrance Junior Member
Started Topics :
16
Posts :
113
Posted : Aug 11, 2010 18:39
And I use Cubase 5 just for rendering my WAVE into a mp3..!! Wahaha..!! xDD
Just kidding, i'm to stupid for Cubase, maybe I will have time to explore that killa software..
Cheers Isra-Soldiers..!! War On The Ground..!! ;DD
Cardinals Cartel
Black Machine
Started Topics :
191
Posts :
3097
Posted : Aug 12, 2010 01:41
Quote:
On 2009-11-16 11:23, exkor wrote:
FL is just a toy
Quote:
On 2009-11-16 11:29, Wizack Twizack wrote:
its not 1999 anymore.
FL is way more developed then u might think it is.
You both right .
Sanathana
Sanathana
Started Topics :
37
Posts :
410
Posted : Aug 12, 2010 20:40
here all tracks you hear are produced using FL Studio
