Trance Forum | Stats | Register | Search | Parties | Advertise | Login

There are 0 trance users currently browsing this page and 1 guest
Trance Forum » » Forum  Production & Music Making - FireWire vs USB

1 2 Next Page →
First Page Last Page
Share on facebook Share on twitter Share on StumbleUpon
Author

FireWire vs USB

CLAW
CLAW

Started Topics :  117
Posts :  2738
Posted : Feb 17, 2008 15:54:09
I know that probably same question has been asked, or several opinions have been mentioned in the past...

I made a small search, found some feedbacks but Im asking again and i want straight answers...

USB or Firewire...??


Is there much difference?
If not then either one can do the job yes?
Reason for buying is just for live... Consider that there is already a good one for studio.


Thanx           • Noize Conspiracy Records •
http://soundcloud.com/c-l-a-w
https://www.facebook.com/CLAW.cy
MadScientist
IsraTrance Full Member

Started Topics :  97
Posts :  1220
Posted : Feb 17, 2008 16:01
I would say firewire, since the transfer rate is much higher than with usb...

I know some people might say now that usb2.0 is faster than fw400, but the transfer rate of usb2.0 is just a maximum afaik, that wont be reached by far...           https://soundcloud.com/hazak

"Have you ever had that feeling where you're not sure if you're awake or still dreaming?"
"Hmm, yeah... All the time, man - it's called mescaline. The only way to fly!"
knocz
Moderator

Started Topics :  40
Posts :  1151
Posted : Feb 17, 2008 17:27
Soon USB will overcome FireWire.. Because you can get faster speeds in serial than parallel.

I have a Presonus Firebox, and I currently use my 4 pin firewire on my notebook for it. And I can say it's really unstable: just a slight touch on the firewire cable and my sound card disconnects. I'm going to get a 6 pin firewire PCIe card, because the 4 pint is too unstable for playing live.

USB has a better connector, but are more needed. You might find yourself with a lack of USB ports..

0.02$           Super Banana Sauce http://www.soundcloud.com/knocz
MadScientist
IsraTrance Full Member

Started Topics :  97
Posts :  1220
Posted : Feb 17, 2008 17:59
its so so, I bet a lot of people will say that parallel transfers are defenately better for audio purposes than serial...especially when doing a REAL livewhere many tracks run at the same time, not just 1 track mixed into another

about 4pin fw, I have no idea...I never got that actually

but in my opinion its more about the manufacturer than about the connector...f.e. I got an usb hd with a bad connector, and it disconnects also sometimes...need to get a new case for the hd soon           https://soundcloud.com/hazak

"Have you ever had that feeling where you're not sure if you're awake or still dreaming?"
"Hmm, yeah... All the time, man - it's called mescaline. The only way to fly!"
orange
Fat Data

Started Topics :  154
Posts :  3918
Posted : Feb 17, 2008 19:25
firewire is faster for audio transfer altough they look similar or usb even faster on paper.
some 4pin fw connectors are pretty flimsy indeed.           http://www.landmark-recordings.com/
http://soundcloud.com/kymamusic
ThiagoNAKA
IsraTrance Full Member

Started Topics :  104
Posts :  1047
Posted : Feb 17, 2008 20:48
Just to mention: most of pc stores told me that I would need to do some tests to know if I my laptop handle well with the PCMCIA adaptor... Some say that I can have considerable loses on pc performance(is that right?). And when I discovered that 6pin PCMCIA does not provide power supply(only better jack), I just quit this adaptor, and be carefull with the cable(I´ve never had problems during live regarding accidently disconecting the cable).

And a question: besides the rate, what´s difference between USB and FW??? I´ve only used my sc with FW connection, but I think USB seems easier to install and handle with. Maybe it´s cause my sc is M-Audio...           LOADING...
orange
Fat Data

Started Topics :  154
Posts :  3918
Posted : Feb 17, 2008 20:55
u answered ur self... its just that is m-audio           http://www.landmark-recordings.com/
http://soundcloud.com/kymamusic
alfalfa
IsraTrance Junior Member
Started Topics :  23
Posts :  72
Posted : Feb 18, 2008 00:07
also depends on your laptop fw chipset.

find out what fw chipset you got and if its anything other than texas instruments i'd go usb 2. if it is texas then i'd go fw. i've read about LOTS of problems with fw audio interfaces on cheaper laptops.

having said that my non texas intsruments laptop has been fine with both fw interfaces ive tried and its a dell, which have a particularaly bad reputation when it comes to fw audio. guess i just got lucky.
CLAW
CLAW

Started Topics :  117
Posts :  2738
Posted : Feb 18, 2008 00:20
Thanx for the fast replies, i will considering it again and probably, i'll go with USB 2 since its much more easier and trustable, and if there is some lack on transfer then it would be such a big problem...

          • Noize Conspiracy Records •
http://soundcloud.com/c-l-a-w
https://www.facebook.com/CLAW.cy
Spindrift
Spindrift

Started Topics :  33
Posts :  1560
Posted : Feb 18, 2008 02:26
First of all transfer speed doesn't matter unless you planning to use many channels of 24/192 audio or something.
For a few channels of 24/44.1 that is a non-issue.

The problem has been with USB that it has not been to reliable and I have come across countless devices that just don't work properly because they use an USB connection, but that situation has approved now.

Using a 4-pin FW live is asking for trouble.
They are unreliable by design and they will work ok for a while until one day it's ehough with slightly touching the cable to make your setup crash.
If you are going to use FW make sure you weither have a laptop with 6-pin or an adapter that works with your SC.
I had a PCMCIA adapter for an M-Audio Ozonic, and that worked fine.

So FW can be more trouble that it's worth nowadays, but I would not discount it and choose my SC based on what connection it uses primarily.           (``·.¸(``·.¸(``·.¸¸.·`´)¸.·`´)¸.·`´)
« .....www.ResonantEarth.com..... »
(¸.·`´(¸.·`´(¸.·`´``·.¸)``·.¸)``·.¸)

http://www.myspace.com/spindriftsounds
http://www.myspace.com/resonantearth
Alex - Aural Invasion
Aural Invasion

Started Topics :  37
Posts :  514
Posted : Feb 18, 2008 12:15
Quote:

On 2008-02-18 02:26, Spindrift wrote:

I had a PCMCIA adapter for an M-Audio Ozonic, and that worked fine.



was it something like this u used? im very nervous about the unstable 4 pin port on my laptop, and want to get rid of this problem, not taking any chances anymore

http://www.amazon.com/Card-PCMCIA-Firewire-Port-Cable/dp/B00008AB53           myspace.com/auralinvasion
reverbnation.com/auralinvasion
www.aural-invasion.com
Spindrift
Spindrift

Started Topics :  33
Posts :  1560
Posted : Feb 18, 2008 13:16
Quote:

On 2008-02-18 12:15, Alex - Aural Invasion wrote:
Quote:

On 2008-02-18 02:26, Spindrift wrote:

I had a PCMCIA adapter for an M-Audio Ozonic, and that worked fine.


was it something like this u used? im very nervous about the unstable 4 pin port on my laptop, and want to get rid of this problem, not taking any chances anymore

http://www.amazon.com/Card-PCMCIA-Firewire-Port-Cable/dp/B00008AB53



Yes, the thing is that some soundcards can be a bit fuzzy with the chipset the adapter is using.
It's recommended to get a FW400 with TI chipset, but I got a TI FW800 and that was working fine with the Ozonic as I said.

I'm using a Indigo now so actually I don't need the one I have, so if you are interested in having it I could sell it cheaply.           (``·.¸(``·.¸(``·.¸¸.·`´)¸.·`´)¸.·`´)
« .....www.ResonantEarth.com..... »
(¸.·`´(¸.·`´(¸.·`´``·.¸)``·.¸)``·.¸)

http://www.myspace.com/spindriftsounds
http://www.myspace.com/resonantearth
CLAW
CLAW

Started Topics :  117
Posts :  2738
Posted : Feb 18, 2008 13:22
Indigo is what I have right now, and because my laptop came with the new 'express' card slot which is smaller, i had to get an adapter to make them fit, with negative results.

Is not working, tried several times, with new drivers and in different laptops as well with no success...
I have decided to sell my indigo and get something new, thats why Im asking about USB or FW...           • Noize Conspiracy Records •
http://soundcloud.com/c-l-a-w
https://www.facebook.com/CLAW.cy
Andreh
Bash / Kernel Panic

Started Topics :  23
Posts :  690
Posted : Feb 18, 2008 14:35
only one thing i would like to tell u guys is, maybe im very wrong, but usb sound cards are working with the USB 2.0?

Coz i´ve notice at home using a edirol UA-25, this sound card for example, work in USB 1.0, whatever if im using a 2.0 port at my computer, it goes at 1.0 speed. Honnestly i´ve enjoyed that, coz i can use a small hub to multiply my usb ports and use the sound card on it without loose some performance.

U guys know about sound card that work with usb 2.0? I´ve owned 3 cards until today, and all of then work @usb1.0. M-Audio Fast Track, Sound Card from M-Audio Ozone and now the Edirol UA-25.           Bash's Home:
http://www.myspace.com/bashbr

Mind Tweakers Records:
http://www.mindtweakers.com
-aeon-
Aeon
Started Topics :  10
Posts :  546
Posted : Feb 18, 2008 14:48
be aware that if you use any other USB devices, your ports may be sharing bandwidth because of hubs. i can only run my soundcard reliably on one USB port on my laptop.

Trance Forum » » Forum  Production & Music Making - FireWire vs USB

1 2 Next Page →
First Page Last Page
Share on facebook Share on twitter Share on StumbleUpon


Copyright © 1997-2025 IsraTrance