Author
|
filtering out those heavy bassy subs
|
Sonica
IsraTrance Junior Member
Started Topics :
43
Posts :
396
Posted : Dec 24, 2008 19:15
|
Quote:
|
On 2008-12-24 19:04, pipe&slippers wrote:
Quote:
|
On 2008-12-24 18:53, Sonica wrote:
Quote:
|
On 2008-12-24 09:19, pipe&slippers wrote:
Quote:
|
On 2008-12-24 04:07, Sonica wrote:
hipass to 70hz? there would be no bass left no?
exactly, so what u gotta do lol, to sweetin up these heavy resonace through the mix
|
|
Depends on how steep the slope is, but 70Hz is too high.
What is the root note of your bassline?
|
|
Say for example f1
|
|
F1 is 43.65Hz. If you have a 24dB/8ve high pass filter at 70Hz, you will loose a lot of the fundamental frequency.
|
| |
|
|
Sonica
IsraTrance Junior Member
Started Topics :
43
Posts :
396
Posted : Dec 24, 2008 19:16
|
sorry accidently qouted..
exactly, so what u gotta do lol, to sweetin up these heavy resonace through the mix
|
|
|
Sonica
IsraTrance Junior Member
Started Topics :
43
Posts :
396
Posted : Dec 24, 2008 19:20
|
so would i have to notch out 43hz ? and some where ever my leads and fx would sit? |
|
|
Sonica
IsraTrance Junior Member
Started Topics :
43
Posts :
396
Posted : Dec 24, 2008 19:24
|
F1 is 43.65Hz- acually it iz 43.654
hehe |
|
|
Elad
Tsabeat/Sattel Battle
Started Topics :
158
Posts :
5306
Posted : Dec 24, 2008 20:07
|
blah anyone listened to the example???
the lower notes are E1.
the main octave for the bass is the second .. the first i like too (love the AIR coming out of the speaker yes) but for remove muddy subs it works.  www.sattelbattle.com
http://yoavweinberg.weebly.com/ |
|
|
Sonica
IsraTrance Junior Member
Started Topics :
43
Posts :
396
Posted : Dec 25, 2008 02:12
|
Quote:
|
On 2008-12-24 20:07, Elad wrote:
blah anyone listened to the example???
the lower notes are E1.
the main octave for the bass is the second .. the first i like too (love the AIR coming out of the speaker yes) but for remove muddy subs it works.
|
|
yes i did mate, and u say u removed all freqs below 70hz? pretty good |
|
|
Elad
Tsabeat/Sattel Battle
Started Topics :
158
Posts :
5306
Posted : Dec 25, 2008 11:35
|
i used z3ta patch (noize-saw + sine)
waves eq , hipass on 70hz , boost on 80hz and slightly on 1600hz
the kick got all the subs there.
the bass is sidechained to the kick
when i move the cut point to 50hz yes its fatter but that works too , its matter of taste , and general mix.  www.sattelbattle.com
http://yoavweinberg.weebly.com/ |
|
|
naga
IsraTrance Junior Member
Started Topics :
40
Posts :
204
Posted : Dec 25, 2008 12:47
|
i tried HiPass at 70hz - it's kind of there but maybe it makes bass too boxy or honk, it seems to bring up too much midfrequences.
i would say just cut lows a little but no highpass
anyway i reckon again how great tools Sonnox Native EQ and Sonic Maximizer are   "" |
|
|
Nectarios
Martian Arts
Started Topics :
187
Posts :
5292
Posted : Dec 25, 2008 14:45
|
Its too thin for my taste + I am not too keen on that bass sound overall. I want to hear and feel the bottom end of a phat bass. Anyhow there are a lot of bass light trance tunes around, so its not "wrong", I just don't like bass light tunes.
 
http://soundcloud.com/martianarts |
|
|
Greententacle
IsraTrance Full Member
Started Topics :
53
Posts :
323
Posted : Dec 25, 2008 16:22
|
Quote:
|
On 2008-12-25 14:45, pipe&slippers wrote:
Its too thin for my taste + I am not too keen on that bass sound overall. I want to hear and feel the bottom end of a phat bass. Anyhow there are a lot of bass light trance tunes around, so its not "wrong", I just don't like bass light tunes.
|
|
+1 |
|
|