| Author
|
Electronic Music/Psy Trance/Blu Ray/High Def content
|
Pavel
Troll
Started Topics :
313
Posts :
8649
Posted : Jul 5, 2008 00:23:37
|
Check this article for a sneak preview of the future.
http://news.cnet.com/8301-13953_3-9937142-80.html
Now think what can be done with Electronic music and Psy Trance specifically with this medium a few years from now.
Discuss
  Everyone in the world is doing something without me |
|
|
|
Tomos
IsraTrance Full Member
Started Topics :
84
Posts :
981
Posted : Jul 5, 2008 02:52
|
Just want to say I saw Neil Young live in London about 2 months ago.
Fabulous, jaw dropping song writing skill.
Lovely stuff. A real song writer that we seem to rarely see theses days.
|
|
|
|
Elad
Tsabeat/Sattel Battle
Started Topics :
158
Posts :
5306
Posted : Jul 5, 2008 14:25
|
yes when someone famous say it its very cool when i say it evryone reply: we cant hear the diffrence from mp3!
higher resolution , more quality , bring it on!
|
|
|
|
Pavel
Troll
Started Topics :
313
Posts :
8649
Posted : Jul 5, 2008 17:40
|
|
It's not about better quality as much as more room for really cool stuff with BD-J which is a Java implementation for Blu Ray. If you'd check the video you'll understand the opportunities. Personally I guess there are like 2% of Psy Trance producers that can utilize the upgrade in the quality. The rest will still sound average to mainstream sound quality.
Everyone in the world is doing something without me |
|
|
|
Kaz
IsraTrance Full Member
Started Topics :
90
Posts :
2268
Posted : Jul 5, 2008 18:27
|
No matter how good ears are, 20bit 88.2KHz is the top quality you can notice in any way even if you are the most hardcore audiophile (not even the most acute hearing can notice more) - if 24bit 192KHz sounds better on your system - it probably isn't up to par with the quality of your data to begin with - and you'd probably spend better money on a good DAC than on a blu-ray player. And keep in mind that the compression is NOT lossless, and will probably effect sound more. And the norm at both concerts and recordings is stereo, not surround. For 2 hours of uncompressed audio, that's 3GB. Could fit on one DVD. Would be far more impressive - an album + video interviews and other cool extras at top notch audio quality. This could be utilized by any mastering engineer, just to bring out the detail in the sound for those people who just want to make the most out of their systems. Of course - this would say nothing about the actual quality of the music. Just how well you hear it.
And then again - on most systems at normal playing volume, a 192kbit mp3 sounds the same to most people as the original. Making all this talk about quality something that's BS. On a high volume or plain high quality system - most people wouldn't notice much of a difference over a regular CD. Don't get me wrong - it'll be there. But I don't buy the high-def revolution in audio, for the same reason it DVD-Audio didn't catch on. By simple logic - the CD is dated technology. But people just don't think quality is that much of an issue anymore. Otherwise it would have been replaced a decade ago, and not by iPods.
The only revolution in sound available is getting good speakers, and the advantages of that are greater than any advanced media you can bring for enjoying your music. http://www.myspace.com/Hooloovoo222 |
|
|
|
Mike A
Subra
Started Topics :
185
Posts :
3954
Posted : Jul 5, 2008 19:28
|
kaz, you can hear 44.1khz with your ears?
grats 
|
|
|
|
Elad
Tsabeat/Sattel Battle
Started Topics :
158
Posts :
5306
Posted : Jul 9, 2008 02:06
|
offcourse this meens 22khz in each speaker
i can hear up to 16.5khz and happy with it (im 28 soon , and done lots of clubing / party)
i still hear the diffrence in high and bass definition from mp3 , and blind tests i made with friends showd that some can tell some not
anywayz offcourse its always better to be able to put more data on the cd , clips interviews hole discography etc. , soon infected version  |
|
|
|
