Trance Forum | Stats | Register | Search | Parties | Advertise | Login

There are 0 trance users currently browsing this page and 1 guest
Trance Forum » » Forum  Production & Music Making - "Dynamic" mixing
Share on facebook Share on twitter Share on StumbleUpon
Author

"Dynamic" mixing

Medea
Aedem/Medea

Started Topics :  127
Posts :  1132
Posted : Aug 5, 2008 23:06:30
Do you automate EQ's and compressor's parameters when mixing your tracks? Or adjust the setting once, to make the sounds fit each other when they are playing together?
For example, you have two leads in similar freq range, when they are playing at the same time, they must be tweaked to sound good together, but when they are playing separately, they can be EQ'd more gently, to keep the color and fatness.           http://soundcloud.com/aedem
TuK
TuK

Started Topics :  41
Posts :  228
Posted : Aug 5, 2008 23:17
i only eq once,
if i need to put different settings on the same lead i put the wave in a different audio track and adjust it seperatly
no automation
          http://soundcloud.com/djtuk
http://www.facebook.com/psytuk
http://www.myspace.com/psy-tuk
MadScientist
IsraTrance Full Member

Started Topics :  97
Posts :  1220
Posted : Aug 6, 2008 00:10
I just let the lead thats more important duck the other one in such cases           https://soundcloud.com/hazak

"Have you ever had that feeling where you're not sure if you're awake or still dreaming?"
"Hmm, yeah... All the time, man - it's called mescaline. The only way to fly!"
Trip-
IsraTrance Team

Started Topics :  101
Posts :  3239
Posted : Aug 6, 2008 08:20
Dynamic mixing ("dynamix" hehe), which involves EQ, compression, leveling etc - a tiresome but very effective way to maintain full color to your mix throughout the whole track.

If a lead part sits very well in the mix with all the other instruments accompanying it, but once you have a solo lead playing it sounds thin and unsatisfying, and it's pretty obvious to happen - you should prepare another EQ or chain of processors to fit the situation. Just switch between the settings instead of automating.

This is only an example, and I know of at least 2 pros who do this, and it won't surprise me that many engineers are doing the same.

You need to have alot of patience for this
cheers           Crackling universes dive into their own neverending crackle...
AgalactiA
Medea
Aedem/Medea

Started Topics :  127
Posts :  1132
Posted : Aug 6, 2008 09:03
Quote:

You need to have alot of patience for this



Yeah, true =)           http://soundcloud.com/aedem
Fragletrollet
Fragletrollet

Started Topics :  111
Posts :  1748
Posted : Aug 6, 2008 12:12
what is also possible, instead of automating the bands on an eq, wich can be very tiresome, just to automate mix level of 2 eqs in the same chain           http://www.myspace.com/fragletrollet
http://www.myspace.com/unknowncausesound
http://www.fragletrollet.com/
psyaudionamics
IsraTrance Junior Member

Started Topics :  38
Posts :  546
Posted : Aug 7, 2008 04:51
that was a fuckn awesome question and i've found myself asking the same question in the back of my head when mixing, i try to avoid it and leave it where its at for the whole song but in some parts i'll automate it and then bring it back, is this the correct way or should i ride that shit to the end??? or just leave it there dammit lol
piko_bianko
Oxya

Started Topics :  57
Posts :  974
Posted : Aug 7, 2008 10:18
i have EQ automations in all my tracks in order to reveal/separate/clear sounds using the same frequency range...

sometimes i use ducking on EQ db values slaved to a more 'master' lead/sound...

on compressors, no. i have tried some times, but i don't see this helping me at this point maybe sometime in the future i come up with a technique specific sounds with comp automation           extreme
piko_bianko
Oxya

Started Topics :  57
Posts :  974
Posted : Aug 7, 2008 10:24
oh level automation used a lot too           extreme
Colin OOOD
Moderator

Started Topics :  95
Posts :  5380
Posted : Aug 7, 2008 14:20
The only thing I never tend to automate is compressor settings, because the results aren't as predictable as if you leave the controls alone - especially if you have other automation on the same channel! Having said that I can imagine some specific situations where that would be useful, if tricky. I think once you automate a compressor, everything before it in the FX chain would need to be considered as complete and finished, unless you're some kind of double-brained genius.

Everything else is fair game.           Mastering - http://mastering.OOOD.net :: www.is.gd/mastering
OOOD 5th album 'You Think You Are' - www.is.gd/tobuyoood :: www.OOOD.net
www.facebook.com/OOOD.music :: www.soundcloud.com/oood
Contact for bookings/mastering - colin@oood.net
Tribute
IsraTrance Junior Member

Started Topics :  12
Posts :  157
Posted : Aug 7, 2008 14:39
never done it before but the best way seems to me like fraggletrollet said:
automate the mix level of 2 eqs!
Mesq
Reality Pixie

Started Topics :  34
Posts :  671
Posted : Aug 8, 2008 10:49
Quote:

On 2008-08-07 14:39, Tribute wrote:
never done it before but the best way seems to me like fraggletrollet said:
automate the mix level of 2 eqs!



Much easier and best way I think.
Trance Forum » » Forum  Production & Music Making - "Dynamic" mixing
 
Share on facebook Share on twitter Share on StumbleUpon


Copyright © 1997-2025 IsraTrance