| Author
|
dumb one
|
TranCeBull
IsraTrance Junior Member
Started Topics :
12
Posts :
90
Posted : May 10, 2002 16:31
|
whats the difference between the DX and the VST VST2 plugins?
like i mean on the performance side ,i dont think there is any on the sound side.
  Come on who neeeds that shit |
|
|
|
Trip-
IsraTrance Team
Started Topics :
101
Posts :
3239
Posted : May 10, 2002 16:38
|
nothing on the sound side.
it's just that VST plugins can be automated withitin the host program. That's the main reason of makin a VST plugin - it can be in motion.
Crackling universes dive into their own neverending crackle...
AgalactiA |
|
|
|
Mike A
Subra
Started Topics :
185
Posts :
3954
Posted : May 10, 2002 17:40
|
And compatibility.
Sonar for example works only with DX and DXi.
VST on the other hand, is much more buggy.
|
|
|
|
Olgra
Started Topics :
6
Posts :
31
Posted : May 11, 2002 02:43
|
no, thats not entirely accurate.. sonar wa the first version of cakewalk to come with a full dx-vsti wrapper with it so sonar can use both direct x and vsti plugins
but on the whole, vst is preferable... most software supports it whereas pre-sonar cakewalk does not, also theres loads of vst plugins of all kinds out there as freewqare and to buy, but theres barely anything freeware for direct x |
|
|
|
klichevski
Started Topics :
6
Posts :
91
Posted : May 11, 2002 05:26
|
good to know 
Apo Rado Dacho. |
|
|
|
