| Author
|
do you EQ a hole in the kick to make room for bass?
|
~d2~
Inactive User
Started Topics :
7
Posts :
751
Posted : Feb 14, 2009 20:54
|
I was wondering what everyone was talking about |
|
|
x-rayz
IsraTrance Junior Member
Started Topics :
11
Posts :
576
Posted : Feb 14, 2009 21:09
|
|
PsYmOrPh
IsraTrance Junior Member
Started Topics :
44
Posts :
309
Posted : Feb 14, 2009 22:03
|
|
x-rayz
IsraTrance Junior Member
Started Topics :
11
Posts :
576
Posted : Feb 15, 2009 00:04
|
|
Elad
Tsabeat/Sattel Battle
Started Topics :
158
Posts :
5306
Posted : Feb 15, 2009 05:14
|
Quote:
|
On 2009-02-14 20:39, x-rayz wrote:
Quote:
|
On 2009-02-14 16:46, ~d2~ wrote:
Did your inner demon get the better of you?
|
|
Nah bro, I think my inner demons are getting better with me 
Quote:
|
FL's peak control is nothing like that exist anywhere that i saw.
|
|
Well Elad, sorry to disappoint you, I know youre FL freak and all, but that peak controller is nothing special, only thing special about it is the name.. So u intrigued me cause your always talk about that peak controller so I take a look of what it does..
From what I saw, it nothing more than a trigger for a track, meaning, it raises amplitude of one track according to the amplitude of other track.. Its cool though, since u can put trigonometry functions in it and has built in LFO..
|
|
wrong 
it takes amplitude of anything u put into it , and makes it A MIDI MESSEGE !!
so u can use it to trigger cutoff with your mouth too! u can link it to anything and use any source. only limit of it is in the mind of the one using it.
nothing like it anywhere i saw. maybe it exist tho im just one guy sure didnt see it all.
actualy , the easiest and most expected thing is to make it volume connected.
thinking out of the box , it does x200 more imo.
the example in this case , to sidechain the kick volume to the low shelf filter , and remover the sub freqs off when the kick hit. sounds better then compression unless u want the pumping effect. even for the pumping effect i would use it with volumes (oposite link) cause it sounds better then compression imo. www.sattelbattle.com
http://yoavweinberg.weebly.com/ |
|
|
|
~d2~
Inactive User
Started Topics :
7
Posts :
751
Posted : Feb 15, 2009 10:08
|
|
You could just automate the EQ |
|
|
|
sahak
Started Topics :
4
Posts :
3
Posted : Feb 15, 2009 11:55
|
|
^ Thats what I do. I could never get sidechaining to sound exactly how I wanted it to, so I just figured i'd do what I wanted with automation lines. |
|
|
|
~d2~
Inactive User
Started Topics :
7
Posts :
751
Posted : Feb 15, 2009 11:59
|
|
^ Yeah only need to do it on a bar or maybe 8 bars and repeat it. Saves CPU as well. |
|
|
|
Nectarios
Martian Arts
Started Topics :
187
Posts :
5292
Posted : Feb 15, 2009 15:54
|
Quote:
|
On 2009-02-12 21:00:13, OpenSourceCode wrote:
or do you cut the bass to make room for the kick?
Right now i'm making some pretty darkpsy with the machinegun bassline, so i was tyring to cut the bass to make some room for the kick, so it's not "floating" on top.
am i crazy?
|
|
a) Yes you are crazy for making dark psy.
b) Don't worry about cutting the bass too much, there is no bottom end in dark psy tunes anyway.
c) Don't worry about mixing things together at all, dark psy is meant to sound shite anyway, cause that would involve the whole breaking of the rules trend, which is a must if you want to be taken seriously by other dark psy producers.
http://soundcloud.com/martianarts |
|
|
|
~d2~
Inactive User
Started Topics :
7
Posts :
751
Posted : Feb 15, 2009 16:07
|
|
TimeTraveller
IsraTrance Full Member
Started Topics :
80
Posts :
3207
Posted : Feb 15, 2009 16:11
|
|
Elad
Tsabeat/Sattel Battle
Started Topics :
158
Posts :
5306
Posted : Feb 15, 2009 16:16
|
who ever said its ok to make the automation for the eq dont understand that its totaly not the same
when i do it with FL peak control , it will send diffrent midi messege to the eq or bass with evry diffrent kick (something extremly easy to change in FL too.. 1 click)
by automate it wont even response to the kick at all just fake to.. not good enough
----------------
Best Producers:
01.Electrypnose (Digital Psionics/Switzerland)
---.Furious (Technical Freaks Records/Russia)
02.Kindzadza (Osom Music/Russia)
---.Perfect Stranger (Iboga Records/Israel)
03.Derango (Parvati Records/Sweden)
hmm makes you think p&s ?
actualy i remember i sent some bass file and u said its thin while it was fat as sumo fighter. i reken u should chack your sub response in the room. i have feeling u got ultra thin soundsystem. maybe the problem is here. but on the dynaudio with acoustic room as well in other studio's and pa systems it translate pritty much 95% acurate imo. www.sattelbattle.com
http://yoavweinberg.weebly.com/ |
|
|
|
~d2~
Inactive User
Started Topics :
7
Posts :
751
Posted : Feb 15, 2009 16:34
|
Elad do you work for FL?
Also Dynaudio are known for being a poor choice for dance music due to their flabby bass response. |
|
|
|
Nectarios
Martian Arts
Started Topics :
187
Posts :
5292
Posted : Feb 15, 2009 16:35
|
Don't get all defensive Elad, I wasn't attacking your production skills. Its just some geeky internet humour, relax.
My Mackies HR824 go down to 37Hz flat. I compare any kind of music to stuff I know sounds fat and its not just subs that make a tune sound fat.
http://soundcloud.com/martianarts |
|
|
|
Nectarios
Martian Arts
Started Topics :
187
Posts :
5292
Posted : Feb 15, 2009 16:46
|
Quote:
|
On 2009-02-15 16:16, Elad wrote:
Best Producers:
01.Electrypnose (Digital Psionics/Switzerland)
---.Furious (Technical Freaks Records/Russia)
02.Kindzadza (Osom Music/Russia)
---.Perfect Stranger (Iboga Records/Israel)
03.Derango (Parvati Records/Sweden)
hmm makes you think p&s ?
|
|
What's this? According to who?
http://soundcloud.com/martianarts |
|
|
|
