COMET SHELL
IsraTrance Junior Member
Started Topics :
50
Posts :
577
Posted : Nov 26, 2011 21:47
Quote:
On 2011-11-26 20:09, disco hooligans wrote:
Anything one can do on one DAW, can be done in another is some way. The things that are important are midi sequencing and audio recording. These aspects are good enough to make nay kind of dance music.
As far as sound sources and processing goes, there are 3rd party plug ins and hardware.
For me Logic is perfect, for others Cubase, Ableton, FL studio...etc.
This discussion is only worth its weight in pointless debating to what suits, each person's workflow.
There is no objective outcome on which is the best, only subjective.
Peace out.
my thoughts exactly.
Cardinals Cartel
Black Machine
Started Topics :
191
Posts :
3097
Posted : Nov 26, 2011 21:56
If there 101 % somwhere im there , Im 100% behind my point i just have 1 % who realy break my logical theory and this is Mr. Orange , I find you akis as an One of 'Wonders of the world' , Realy .. I dont joking , I follow your music many years And the great music you have done with the Fl , But friend .. Theres not alot of expert artists like you And/But we both know m8 thats on realy top daws you clould get an better results , Right ? So this is what im talking about , You can be the best doctor in kenya or nigeria thats not matter if you dont have an basic (Modern) Western medicines & instruments - Peoples die one by one in your hands from malaria and so And you can't do nothing , When here its just an little injection .
orange
Fat Data
Started Topics :
154
Posts :
3918
Posted : Nov 26, 2011 22:07
yoko.. i choosed flstudio. i was a cubase user since 1998 on atari.
i still use cubase when i work with audio recording and bands.
flstudio workflow is the best for me.
any track i mix in other daw (cubase, studio one, logic) sounds the same as flstudio... cos im the same user.
Ricciardo
IsraTrance Junior Member
Started Topics :
10
Posts :
188
Posted : Nov 27, 2011 01:30
today its all a matter of workflow
every DAW this days can make a HD rendering with very acurate alogorythm
in fact most of the features each DAW have are universal, most of them can actualy be used in others
the quality on audio is a result of the way the plugins are modelated, the way the sound is mixed and offcourse the mixing structure as well
there is no magical cubase mixer that makes the sound PRO, there is no PRO TOOLS super quality that make every plugin sound amazing, or logic super audio quality, that type of "MYTH" happens only because this are the older softwares in the market, and as they are older, it means they got inicialy an advantage, so its plenty normal that professionals chose thouse Softwares because they were the only one´s avaliable in that market, wich means they still today are taking advantage of being pioneers and represent market standart choices, not because of quality, but actualy because they were just the first avaliable sequencing software´s
there is no B Class, there is no A class... Daw wars are silly, they are only claim by people who have nothing else to claim to be better than others than just the daw they use it self
i own 1 license for Flstudio and other License for REAPER, i use them for diferent purposes, FL for midi sequencing, wich is one of the very best around, and reaper for audio sequencing and post-production stuff... i can use them without any limitations as i have a high end machine with 16gb of ram and a super i7 cpu, i can use heavy stuff without notice lack of quality in the final product
so... its not a matter of the software, if you want to deliver a strong quality final product, first you need a good audio device sound card, then a good computer and knoledge, nothing else, use whatever daw you want... and cut the crap
