| Author
|
Cubase vst plugins in FL Studio?
|
radi6404
IsraTrance Junior Member
Started Topics :
19
Posts :
156
Posted : Sep 11, 2005 16:37
|
|
In future i will use FL Studio only as a operator, i will not use FL plugins, i will search for other plugins and use FL Studio becuase it´s very easy to work in it and is faster than cubase. I will try to make tracks like hallucinogen lsd or fluoro neuro sponge, but not remixes. |
|
|
vox
Started Topics :
2
Posts :
114
Posted : Sep 11, 2005 22:36
|
Quote:
|
On 2005-09-11 11:01, radi6404 wrote:
vox I can download nothing from there, the´re no download links there, why you give links that don´t work, they are only links to program sites, and from there i don´t found anythink to download.
|
|
well it is not a file server, and the links are in the top right part of the window (under hidden links). i use kvr for 4 years now, and i downloaded most of the free stuff from the sites listed on kvr. and if you plan to make music, you better spend some energy to find the tools, i gave you the names of synths to look for, is it so hard to google for them? if you do not want to search for synths yourself a little, how will you make music? it takes dedication and time and will to learn it. what will be next, a question like - how do i arrange the patterns? how do i automate the synths? how do i add a reverb? and a lot of other questions which you will have to find answers yourself because you have to learn it yourself. if you can't find the links, try looking for more than 3 seconds. make an effort for yourself.
i do not plan to give you every link on the silver plate, and i do not think anyone should.
 http://myspace.com/voxproject |
|
|
|
vox
Started Topics :
2
Posts :
114
Posted : Sep 11, 2005 22:39
|
Quote:
|
On 2005-09-11 01:32, radi6404 wrote:
vox, thank you veeeeery much, you´re a great help for me! The cubase piano roll is very big and the cubase as same has very big buttons, it is bad to work because every window is very big and if you luse focus of a window and it is behind other windows you must find it if you want to use it again, it is very time intensive.
|
|
well piano roll can be as small or as big as you want, the window is resizeable you know. dunno, i like it the way it is, i tried the new midi editor in the arrangement window, and i don't really like that new feature.
http://myspace.com/voxproject |
|
|
|
mk47
Inactive User
Started Topics :
118
Posts :
4444
Posted : Sep 12, 2005 13:46
|
dont listen to anyone man ... fl studio is a kik ass sequencer .. and always remember ..its not the tools..its how u use them  |
|
|
|
diskonekt
Fat Data
Started Topics :
37
Posts :
1112
Posted : Sep 12, 2005 15:31
|
Quote:
|
On 2005-09-12 13:46, mk47 wrote:
its not the tools..its how u use them
|
|
sooooo true
Peace, Love, Death metal |
|
|
|
XrTC
Started Topics :
7
Posts :
720
Posted : Sep 15, 2005 12:54
|
i find the topic funny, i actually want to do the exact opposite: use fruity plugins in cubase! 
but i think i will start a new topic for that... 
.
Respect is earned, not demanded...
.
http://www.myspace.com/xrtcmusic
. |
|
|
|
WAVELOGIX
Wavelogix
Started Topics :
136
Posts :
1214
Posted : Sep 15, 2005 21:29
|
|
but tools also matter |
|
|
|
radi6404
IsraTrance Junior Member
Started Topics :
19
Posts :
156
Posted : Sep 17, 2005 00:11
|
|
I liked the JC16 (or so) from cubase but it is impossible to use it in FL Studio |
|
|
|
Willy Wonka
Inactive User
Started Topics :
13
Posts :
574
Posted : Sep 17, 2005 01:00
|
Answer simple
if you want clean output use Cubase
if you want hardware support use Cubase
if you want pro audio work use Cubase
Fruity Producer just fail in all these aspects. |
|
|
|
radi6404
IsraTrance Junior Member
Started Topics :
19
Posts :
156
Posted : Sep 17, 2005 01:04
|
Quote:
|
On 2005-09-17 01:00, Willy Wonka wrote:
Answer simple
if you want clean output use Cubase
if you want hardware support use Cubase
if you want pro audio work use Cubase
Fruity Producer just fail in all these aspects.
|
|
If you want a very ressources eating musikmakter use cubase
If you want to spent very long time on a song use cubase because the playlist is very bad to use |
|
|
|
tHuJoN
Freakulizer / Khainz
Started Topics :
115
Posts :
932
Posted : Sep 17, 2005 02:27
|
Quote:
|
If you want a very ressources eating musikmakter use cubase ...
|
|
Who cares if u have a good/strong computer ? 
Quote:
|
If you want to spent very long time on a song use cubase because the playlist is very bad to use
|
|
If u know how to work with the sequencer in cubase u wouldn't writhe this mutch more comfortable as fruity ... and u wont spend more time as in fruity ... It's just practis ...
As i sayed i worked for a long time in fruity ... and first i had the same thoughts like u .. but now i'm veeery happy that i changed from fruity to cubase...
It just needs some times untill u get into a software ...
But anyway ... its getting oooofff topic ... and we wont start an other cubase vs. fruity tread ...
use what u feel like ... and how u feel comfortable ...
Greetimgs
Simon
www.myspace.com/freakulizer
www.facebook.com/freakulizer
www.myspace.com/khainzmusic
http://www.facebook.com/khainzmusic |
|
|
|
Willy Wonka
Inactive User
Started Topics :
13
Posts :
574
Posted : Sep 18, 2005 03:21
|
You wrong in both Radi,
Cubase and Fruity Producer uses about the same amount of memory and CPU while same effects/instruments used. I can go firther and say that Steinberg's top programming is ahead of amateur Image Line team. Moreover in Cubase there is small thing called offline processing (applying process and saving it state without loading it fully, allows you to change it anytime you want) and bounce (quick export of vsti audio channel which saves the state of instrument while not loading it fully, allows you to change it any time you want). These two functions can reduce memory and CPU usage while in Fruity Producer the only thing which reduces resources usage is some sort of effects bypass called smart disable which closes the output signal from effect you applied on channel after certain amount of time.
About usability and interface of Cubase, those who familiar with Cubase and assigned shortcuts for different tasks can sequence much faster than in pattern kind of sequencer as Fruity Producer is which has small amount of shortcut keys. Neverless to say that pattern based sequencers are made for loop creation rather musical production. In wrong hands Fruity can become repetitive loop tool. |
|
|
|
ucc
IsraTrance Junior Member
Started Topics :
16
Posts :
316
Posted : Sep 18, 2005 03:50
|
Quote:
|
On 2005-09-18 03:21, Willy Wonka wrote:
In wrong hands Fruity can become repetitive loop tool.
|
|
sorry, but on what is trance based on?
loops and repetitiviness, eh?
there's the other 2 stylish dance floor styles that are based exactly on the same, house and techno, eh?
on the right hands, fruity loops can turn into a very powerful tool, cubase on the wrong hands, a repetitive loop tool.
no pun intended |
|
|
|
Willy Wonka
Inactive User
Started Topics :
13
Posts :
574
Posted : Sep 18, 2005 13:32
|
|
By looping tool, i meant music limited by loop and not basic groove of any dance music. PRobably you don't know what it is but surely some of producers here know what is loop limited music. |
|
|
|
diskonekt
Fat Data
Started Topics :
37
Posts :
1112
Posted : Sep 18, 2005 15:31
|
|
nottttt again ....
Peace, Love, Death metal |
|
|
|
