| Author
|
Cubase vst plugins in FL Studio?
|
The_Guardians_Of_Truth
Atma
Started Topics :
16
Posts :
379
Posted : Sep 10, 2005 18:04
|
I used both Cubase and Fl Studio and i can say that the only bad part of FL. is that you can not create group channels...in rest... i can say it is much better, easyer and much stable than Cubase..i am talking as a sequencer not as audio rec. studio..
And btw...excepting VB 1, Quadrafuzz and Bit Crusher, i never used any other Cubase plugins..comparing with other vst's they sucks..same thing as Fl studio's plugins.
if you need quallity, use synths as Absynth, Terra, D'acota, Vanguard, Albino, Oddity...and effects from Ultrafunk, Waves, Psp,Timeworks,Antares...Forget about the vst's comeing free with the sequencers.
Boom !!!
|
|
|
radi6404
IsraTrance Junior Member
Started Topics :
19
Posts :
156
Posted : Sep 10, 2005 20:26
|
|
I have it, i have download the muon tau plugin, that sounds like the great psychedelic tb303 synth, now i can use FL Studio to make my music. |
|
|
|
ucc
IsraTrance Junior Member
Started Topics :
16
Posts :
316
Posted : Sep 11, 2005 00:09
|
cm303 is freeware, can be legally found in every ComputerMusics dvd(is this really a new to any one?)
personally i'd go Rebirth... and if the true emulation is not really an issue and you're on for just the kind of 303 acidic basslines there loads of cool attempts running pcs msdos to amigas c64s and ataris
<temporary signature>
worry on to have fun |
|
|
|
vox
Started Topics :
2
Posts :
114
Posted : Sep 11, 2005 01:13
|
Quote:
|
On 2005-09-10 04:02, radi6404 wrote:
Thanks, can you give me a link were i can download this plugins?
I understand ... FL is very good to start with ...
I don't realy know plugs like the Fruity303 ...
If i find good generators i will continue use FL Studio because it´s very easy to use and the plugins sounds the same in cubase or FL or Reason
|
|
the plugins do not sound the same in reason because reason does not support vst plugins.
btw i dont really know why you think cubase piano roll is bad, i used both and i think that cubase sx piano roll is great - it has more functions than fruity, and is more intuitive. but if you prefer fruity for that, its cool. for freeware synths, go to kvraudio.com, and search for the following synths: antti asynth, refx tbl, refx claw, rgcaudio triangleII, synth1, buzzroom lallapaloosa, ephonic drumatic, iblit, polyblit, krakli karnage, minimogue va, muon cm101 and tau, novakill synths (egokiller, fearkiller, neokiller, karmakiller, soulkiller), superwave p8, etc.
 http://myspace.com/voxproject |
|
|
|
vox
Started Topics :
2
Posts :
114
Posted : Sep 11, 2005 01:23
|
Quote:
|
On 2005-09-10 18:04, The_Guardians_Of_Truth wrote:
I used both Cubase and Fl Studio and i can say that the only bad part of FL. is that you can not create group channels...in rest... i can say it is much better, easyer and much stable than Cubase..i am talking as a sequencer not as audio rec. studio..
And btw...excepting VB 1, Quadrafuzz and Bit Crusher, i never used any other Cubase plugins..comparing with other vst's they sucks..same thing as Fl studio's plugins.
if you need quallity, use synths as Absynth, Terra, D'acota, Vanguard, Albino, Oddity...and effects from Ultrafunk, Waves, Psp,Timeworks,Antares...Forget about the vst's comeing free with the sequencers.
Boom !!!
|
|
well, cubase's A1 is a really good synth, and embracer and monologue are really good for their purpose. don't ditch the included synths, they are better than most people expect.
btw, fruity cannot create groups, but you can route the output of several channels to some other channels, which makes that channel a group channel.
i used fruity (up to 4.5 version) and after that i switched to cubase - fruity becomes cluttered very quickly with lots of tracks (one for each sample) and with a lot of patterns (for each change in drum pattern a new pattern has to be created). my arrangements had up to 40 tracks in fruity, now in cubase most of the time less than 15, and they all fit on one screen, which is invaluable. even though i needed some time to get accustomed to cubase, now i will never switch to fruity again. a friend of mine finds fruity easier to start a track, but cubase is easier for him to use when making final song arrangements and mixdown. so, basically, to each his own.
http://myspace.com/voxproject |
|
|
|
radi6404
IsraTrance Junior Member
Started Topics :
19
Posts :
156
Posted : Sep 11, 2005 01:32
|
|
vox, thank you veeeeery much, you´re a great help for me! The cubase piano roll is very big and the cubase as same has very big buttons, it is bad to work because every window is very big and if you luse focus of a window and it is behind other windows you must find it if you want to use it again, it is very time intensive. |
|
|
|
radi6404
IsraTrance Junior Member
Started Topics :
19
Posts :
156
Posted : Sep 11, 2005 11:01
|
|
vox I can download nothing from there, the´re no download links there, why you give links that don´t work, they are only links to program sites, and from there i don´t found anythink to download. |
|
|
|
WAVELOGIX
Wavelogix
Started Topics :
136
Posts :
1214
Posted : Sep 11, 2005 11:06
|
LOL , how easy it is for any topic to get converted into a FL v/s Cubase war .... hahah .............. somethings always are funny ...........
y bother about the toools soo much , bother about the RESULTS ! |
|
|
|
radi6404
IsraTrance Junior Member
Started Topics :
19
Posts :
156
Posted : Sep 11, 2005 11:28
|
Quote:
|
y bother about the toools soo much , bother about the RESULTS !
|
|
Can you explain that, i understand nothing |
|
|
|
Freeflow
IsraTrance Full Member
Started Topics :
60
Posts :
3709
Posted : Sep 11, 2005 12:08
|
Quote:
|
On 2005-09-11 11:28, radi6404 wrote:
Quote:
|
y bother about the toools soo much , bother about the RESULTS !
|
|
Can you explain that, i understand nothing
|
|
hehe, what is there to explain?
it says "you bother about the tools soo much, bother about the results"
anyway, whats wrong with the FL studios native plugs? they all work, and if they produce clicks its probably your setup...
i can agree that the plugins is not of top notch quality, but they should do a decent job! i mean if you where a audiophile you would probably work with protools with Digi design in highest resolution and with top notch external hardware-units with the best monitors on the market and perfect acoustic treated room...
now if you are relative new to making music, i.e 1,2,3,4,5,6,7 years of fiddling then your concern would be to learn the stuff and make music with the tools you got, and with as few tools as possible to not make things confusing...
so if you get pops and clicks with FL native FX then guess what you would get with high quality FX? 
im not trying to put you down, if you got something against the FL plugs then there is a possibilty to incorporate other plugins...
but the question is, can your system handle it?
maybe you could tell me more about your setup, maybe i can recommend some plugs...
but do instead like wavelogix said, concentrate on the results.. I.e come close to the FX you are after with the tools you got.... if you have done your best and you still aint happy, then question your knowledge, and if you are sure its the plugin that is not doing it for you then just try a new one
|
|
|
|
-dudi-
IsraTrance Junior Member
Started Topics :
41
Posts :
277
Posted : Sep 11, 2005 13:15
|
all i can tell u is that try using external plugins in the fruity loops studio ,,, according to me fruity loops is the best sequencer around ,,,, theres so much i hv learnt and discovered in fruity ,, my suggestion is to get ur hands on some external plugins to improve on the quality of production.
honestly this worked for me.the muzik was sounding really horrible on fruity till i started using external plugins ... now the production a whole lot better ,,, and people get shocked when i tell them i produced the tracks on fruity
but honestly if u still feel that u arent getting the desired quality tht u need for your music , then switch over to cubase.its not that hard ,,, ull hv to take some time out to understand the basic detalis ,,, but ull get the hang of it.
as for using cubase plugins in fruity ,, all i can tell u is to copy paste the .dll files of the plugins to the vst folder in fruity ,,, it might help !
booom
and hv fun sound designing  |
|
|
|
radi6404
IsraTrance Junior Member
Started Topics :
19
Posts :
156
Posted : Sep 11, 2005 13:26
|
Hey, how can you say the fruityloops plugins are good, with this synths it is impossible to make a atmosphere like in trance tracks, trance is a music that if you listen to that you feel like you by oudside. For example if i listen Solid electronics from Astral Projection i feel like i by at the sea. the freeware tau plugin is better than all fruity plugins to reproduce this kind of atmosphere in the tracks.
im not trying to put you down, if you got something against the FL plugs then there is a possibilty to incorporate other plugins...
but the question is, can your system handle it?
Since 5 months i have a new computer. Athlon 64 3500+, 1 GB DDR 400 Dual Channel Ram
|
|
|
|
Freeflow
IsraTrance Full Member
Started Topics :
60
Posts :
3709
Posted : Sep 11, 2005 14:46
|
radi6404 - yeah well then its just a matter of knowledge...
give me a copy of FL studio, with all its native plugs and ill make a decent sounding track, with atmospheres and all that shit...
stop blaming the program m8! its you thats the failing link....
comprende?
now read my first post again, and try to find where i once said that the FL plugins are good... i said that they are not top notch but they work and they are able to give a decent result...
in fact im even prepared to say that they are good, good for the value...
and that its all about the hands they are in...
so man... please... are you that good in music production that you can say that its bad stuff when thousands FL users will tell different...
anyway you should not have any issue with computer power...
|
|
|
|
radi6404
IsraTrance Junior Member
Started Topics :
19
Posts :
156
Posted : Sep 11, 2005 15:16
|
|
I want make music like hallucinogen, and for this the fruity plugins are shit!!! Or do you think Simon had used fruityloops in year 1996? |
|
|
|
Freeflow
IsraTrance Full Member
Started Topics :
60
Posts :
3709
Posted : Sep 11, 2005 16:29
|
Quote:
|
On 2005-09-11 15:16, radi6404 wrote:
I want make music like hallucinogen, and for this the fruity plugins are shit!!! Or do you think Simon had used fruityloops in year 1996?
|
|
may i ask why you use FL studio?
im not a FL user, i have worked with the program some, but i like classical sequencers, i work in cubase!
so i really cant answer you.. maybe you should ask mr postford what he did use back then, and get your self what he used, i bet that you will make hallucinogen style music directly..
get real with me okej
maybe i sounded rude before but all im trying to say is that knowledge about how things work is the main thing...
do you understand me..
now do your self a favour.. stop hanging around FL and change to something else, it sounds like you dont like what you are working with so why stick to it?
|
|
|
|
|
