| Author
|
Cubase SX 3
|
parapsyched
Scratch 22
Started Topics :
72
Posts :
548
Posted : Nov 25, 2004 20:16
|
been working on the sx3 for a few days.
amazing!!! great improvment. can`t wait for the 3.something ver.
i agree cubase has it`s disadvanteges but the sx3 is a real improvment. and as said here b4: every sequncer has its ups and downs....
  if u dig deep enough u just might reach the sky...
"dream is destiny"
http://www.scratch-22.com |
|
|
|
Colin OOOD
Moderator
Started Topics :
95
Posts :
5380
Posted : Nov 25, 2004 20:33
|
|
WAVELOGIX
Wavelogix
Started Topics :
136
Posts :
1214
Posted : Nov 25, 2004 20:50
|
hey parapsyched , so maybe u can tell ...
does sx 3 , have any type of step sequencer built in for easy composing ??? |
|
|
|
Colin OOOD
Moderator
Started Topics :
95
Posts :
5380
Posted : Nov 25, 2004 22:28
|
|
Sound Crystal
IsraTrance Junior Member
Started Topics :
26
Posts :
64
Posted : Nov 26, 2004 02:17
|
So does SX 3 have a built in pattern based sequencer, somthing like the matrix in Reason?
Havent read anything about it on steinbergs website...
|
|
|
|
parapsyched
Scratch 22
Started Topics :
72
Posts :
548
Posted : Nov 26, 2004 15:52
|
don`t know... don`t need something like that... so i don`t know if it exists. u do have the inner loop option in the midi editor and u can now edit midi parts on the main screen without going into the midi editor.
if u dig deep enough u just might reach the sky...
"dream is destiny"
http://www.scratch-22.com |
|
|
|
dNETv2
Started Topics :
2
Posts :
168
Posted : Nov 28, 2004 04:09
|
SX2 has had a Step Sequencer built right into the piano roll/midi editor. Read the manual guys...
...and Kaz! Think before you speak, the people who actually do know what they are talking about will correct you otherwise.
Cheers  |
|
|
|
Kaz
IsraTrance Full Member
Started Topics :
90
Posts :
2268
Posted : Nov 28, 2004 12:17
|
dNETv2: I think before I speak, and therefor was not corrected, even by you... or do you know something other people don't?
BTW: the calculations don't really take that much time - you just add the latency to the delay in either miliseconds or as fractions of a beat with one drag of the mouse (or by typing in the numbers if you actually bother with a calculator for this).
The time you save by not using stupid and useless extra menus that make no sense (like the instrument panel - why not add the VSTis in the mixer like any other VST?). Someone could make a track in Logic only using the arrangement window with only the mouse, the rest (other screens, keyboard, control keyboard etc) are to make that work easier. SX 3 has yet to impress me enough to make the move from Logic 5.5. http://www.myspace.com/Hooloovoo222 |
|
|
|
Colin OOOD
Moderator
Started Topics :
95
Posts :
5380
Posted : Nov 29, 2004 03:24
|
|
dNETv2
Started Topics :
2
Posts :
168
Posted : Nov 29, 2004 04:04
|
|
Correcting you? No, I wasn't.. but everything you said about Cubase was, cause obviously you don't know. That's my point. |
|
|
|
Trip-
IsraTrance Team
Started Topics :
101
Posts :
3239
Posted : Nov 29, 2004 10:52
|
folks,
let's not go on with the endless debate between sequencers. Everything's been said 
You choose where to snooze (and when to lose)...
PS: about PDC, i never had to mangle around with it too much - everything works without it still. Logic rules
Crackling universes dive into their own neverending crackle...
AgalactiA |
|
|
|
Kaz
IsraTrance Full Member
Started Topics :
90
Posts :
2268
Posted : Nov 29, 2004 13:59
|
|
dNETv2
Started Topics :
2
Posts :
168
Posted : Nov 29, 2004 20:49
|
Ok mister Cubase doesn't have aux tracks.  |
|
|
|
sophicos
Triac
Started Topics :
4
Posts :
161
Posted : Nov 30, 2004 00:17
|
|
WAVELOGIX
Wavelogix
Started Topics :
136
Posts :
1214
Posted : Nov 30, 2004 08:49
|
|
but dont people using cubase make music as well as ppl using logic ?? then what is the fuss about ? |
|
|
|
