| Author
|
cubase export better than fl's ?
|
Deranger
IsraTrance Junior Member
Started Topics :
36
Posts :
214
Posted : Feb 23, 2008 15:20:44
|
is that true?
and if i finish a track in fl,doing rewire and exporting in cubase the sound quality will be better? |
|
|
FreakyFreQuencies
Started Topics :
1
Posts :
51
Posted : Feb 23, 2008 16:01
|
I don't know is reware'ing take a better effect.
When I render track from FL studio a sound is muddy.
When I render every channel to different wave, import to Cubase and then export to one file I take a better quality.
I think a problem with FL is in mix algorithm.
Maybe my ears are confuse but I hear difference in mix from FL and other DAW's.
For that I don't use FL now. |
|
|
|
knocz
Moderator
Started Topics :
40
Posts :
1151
Posted : Feb 23, 2008 16:37
|
|
Elad
Tsabeat/Sattel Battle
Started Topics :
158
Posts :
5306
Posted : Feb 23, 2008 16:49
|
i dont see how export with cubase is any diffrent if u not touch anything
but usualy if i take the mix to cubase i will re-do all the volumes so sure its diffrent outcome
and also for the audio edit options its good idea
so anywayz
export - split mixer channel - more work in cubase - final export 
 www.sattelbattle.com
http://yoavweinberg.weebly.com/ |
|
|
|
Glitch_CapeTown
IsraTrance Junior Member
Started Topics :
36
Posts :
952
Posted : Feb 23, 2008 17:45
|
|
Deranger
IsraTrance Junior Member
Started Topics :
36
Posts :
214
Posted : Feb 23, 2008 17:59
|
thx all
tsa i think i'm going to try this.. |
|
|
|
Elad
Tsabeat/Sattel Battle
Started Topics :
158
Posts :
5306
Posted : Feb 23, 2008 18:03
|
|
PoM
IsraTrance Full Member
Started Topics :
162
Posts :
8087
Posted : Feb 23, 2008 18:14
|
|
maybe fl use a different paning law? the sound should be the same in all daw , if it s sound different one have bad coding cause it s math 100 %. you can try to export like 10 audio tracks playing at the same time in fl,do the same in cubase and reverse the phase of one to see if they cancell each other |
|
|
|
FreakyFreQuencies
Started Topics :
1
Posts :
51
Posted : Feb 23, 2008 18:43
|
In FL panning law is unknown (I never found any info about it). Maybe You have right. It's very possible
For me Cubase's render is more clearly than from FL.
Maybe it's just auto-suggestion.
For this month I havent possible to test it with phase reversing. |
|
|
|
PoM
IsraTrance Full Member
Started Topics :
162
Posts :
8087
Posted : Feb 23, 2008 19:05
|
|
it s maybe placebo effect, sometimes i find reaper sounding cleaner and a bit thiner than cubase but they null perfectly.maybe try to change the skin of fl if it s possible |
|
|
|
Glitch_CapeTown
IsraTrance Junior Member
Started Topics :
36
Posts :
952
Posted : Feb 23, 2008 19:46
|
|
orange
Fat Data
Started Topics :
154
Posts :
3918
Posted : Feb 23, 2008 21:33
|
we use fl for the last 5 years and was using and still use cubase till now (not that often anymore tho)
cubase's high freq's sound better and more bright.
also has more panning law options than fl's circular and triangular.
audio handling is easier in cubase multitrack recording also (by far).
but as far sound quality goes... i find them pretty similar .
few months ago we made a full track in cubase only.. and it sounded pretty much the same as our fl ones.
workflow on the other hand cubaseis way behind fl.
what i do in cubase in 2 hours i can do in fl in 45 minutes.
http://www.landmark-recordings.com/
http://soundcloud.com/kymamusic |
|
|
|
Elad
Tsabeat/Sattel Battle
Started Topics :
158
Posts :
5306
Posted : Feb 24, 2008 00:30
|
|
Deranger
IsraTrance Junior Member
Started Topics :
36
Posts :
214
Posted : Feb 24, 2008 01:00
|
Quote:
|
workflow on the other hand cubaseis way behind fl.
what i do in cubase in 2 hours i can do in fl in 45 minutes.
|
|
same for me , workflow in fruity is much better |
|
|
|
Suloo
IsraTrance Full Member
Started Topics :
87
Posts :
2822
Posted : Feb 24, 2008 01:22
|
Quote:
|
On 2008-02-24 01:00, Deranger wrote:
Quote:
|
workflow on the other hand cubaseis way behind fl.
what i do in cubase in 2 hours i can do in fl in 45 minutes.
|
|
same for me , workflow in fruity is much better
|
|
Hmm..don`t know actualy..i used fruity a long time ago..where i had absolutly no idea how to use it proper..now i`m very used to cubase..so i can do things pretty fast..isn`t it just a matter about how your used to the sequencer?or is it a matter of fact that in fruity things can be done much faster?i mean i always use a template session for beginning..where i already prepared a lot of things i always do..so i can start immediatly with everything..just wonder..
-------......-------...-..-..-..-.-.-.-.- |
|
|
|
