| Author
|
compression in offline processing
|
Surrender
IsraTrance Team
Started Topics :
506
Posts :
5388
Posted : Dec 23, 2005 18:53
|
does anyone do this to conserve cpu? or is the very idea idiotic by nature since you cannot hear what youre doing due to the fact its not in the mix but offline...
  "On the other hand, you have different fingers."
http://myspace.com/gadimon |
|
|
|
sy000321
IsraTrance Junior Member
Started Topics :
46
Posts :
1142
Posted : Dec 23, 2005 19:01
|
yeah.. you're right... it's idiotic 
roll a joint or STFU :) |
|
|
|
Surrender
IsraTrance Team
Started Topics :
506
Posts :
5388
Posted : Dec 23, 2005 21:08
|
|
martyn
IsraTrance Junior Member
Started Topics :
40
Posts :
389
Posted : Dec 23, 2005 22:20
|
|
i try to save cpu through offline processing like nolightatend mentioned (first fiddling with inserts until it sounds right and then saving it as preset) or bouncing while producing - all fx except from eq - because i think its best to be able to equalize the sounds in relation to new elements until the track is finished.
www.myspace.com/mentris |
|
|
|
parapsyched
Scratch 22
Started Topics :
72
Posts :
548
Posted : Dec 27, 2005 17:30
|
i think its good if u use it smart. like said b4 about doing the sound online than proccesing it offline . it s a good way. and u could alwalys use the off line process history (cubase & nuendo users) to undo what you`ve done.
i started using it because of kicks. like when i had a kick playing 1/16 notes or 1/32 notes in a row the volume tends to jump but the compressing applied to the track was right for the rest of the time but not for that part and i didn`t want to ruin that comp. or automate it ... so i offline processed just the part i needed. its a great way to work if u do it carefully.
if u dig deep enough u just might reach the sky...
"dream is destiny"
http://www.scratch-22.com |
|
|
|
