| Author
|
Bouncing off Vsti in nuendo / sx ??
|
WAVELOGIX
Wavelogix
Started Topics :
136
Posts :
1214
Posted : Oct 21, 2004 15:22
|
well guys , all problems sorted ....
ultimately im working fullly with nuendo 2 and am not worrying much abt the speed .... i think i willl become faster with time ...
but 2day i just finished 64 bars of my new trk , tht i made in nuendo 2 , using battery as a sampler .... and WOW .... it sounds AWeSOME
i have never heard such quality on my monitors b4 frm my mixes 
even not when i was usign fruity loops combined with nuendo ....
i just fail to understand y things sound soo good as they do in nuendo .... bah !!
respect ... boom ! |
|
|
Hayez
Started Topics :
8
Posts :
393
Posted : Oct 21, 2004 21:54
|
I didn't get you Colin on the bit depth preference. Why would you bounce to 24 when you can bounce to 32 ?, It doesen't save space, and I'm pretty sure it doesn't save cpu.
I understand GTN, 30% can't be enough if you are using quality plug-ins like Waves REQ and RCL. I prefer to bounce so I could mix with better plug-ins. I sure need a CPU that goes into 110%. 
 "a new art came into my mind which only you can create, the Art of Noises, the logical consequence of your marvelous innovations." Russolo, 1913 |
|
|
|
Colin OOOD
Moderator
Started Topics :
95
Posts :
5380
Posted : Oct 22, 2004 03:03
|
24-bit is enough resolution to capture even the quietest sound when recording; however when processing is applied, the inherent innacuracy of the digital process means quantising errors can creep in, causing loss of detail in quiet passages - even more so when the sound being processed is quiet to start off with. This is why the internal mix engines of all sequencers are 32-bit floating-point, as the 32-bit system allows the 24-bit dynamic range to be 'scaled', allowing very very quiet sounds (eg reverb tails) to be recorded with full 24-bit resolution, and avoiding introducing quantising noise to processed sounds.
As for 24-bit 'not saving space' compared to 32-bit, do the maths: 1 data-word of 32-bit is 1/3 as big again as 1 data-word of 24-bit. 32-bit is also (think) more efficient CPU-wise as processors have 32- or 64-bit data busses, not 24-bit.
Mastering - http://mastering.OOOD.net :: www.is.gd/mastering
OOOD 5th album 'You Think You Are' - www.is.gd/tobuyoood :: www.OOOD.net
www.facebook.com/OOOD.music :: www.soundcloud.com/oood
Contact for bookings/mastering - colin@oood.net |
|
|
|
|
