Author
|
Bass frequency power shifts...
|
illusions
Erebus
Started Topics :
40
Posts :
626
Posted : Feb 2, 2007 10:24
|
Quote:
|
On 2007-02-02 02:20, shamantrixx wrote:
It's due to the sample rate of your soundcard and the standard equal temperament tuning. Try to switch samplerate to 48kHz and tune down your instruments to 423 Hz instead of 440 Hz. You'll be amazed with the clarity of sound.
|
|
Shamantrixx - good that you've brought this up again. It seems to have gotten criticized quite a bit in other threads. Since you state so blatantly that the clarity of the sound would be so much different - would it be possible to get some audio samples from you demonstrating this ?
Im sure it would help a lot of us. |
|
|
Mike A
Subra
Started Topics :
185
Posts :
3954
Posted : Feb 2, 2007 19:55
|
Quote:
|
On 2007-02-02 02:20, shamantrixx wrote:
bla bla bla bla
|
|
All of this has absolutely nothing to do with the sound of the bassline.
makus - my guess is that you changed it to a freq where you room resonates, so it sounds "more powerful".
|
|
|
shamantrixx
Started Topics :
7
Posts :
549
Posted : Feb 3, 2007 10:27
|
@ Mike A: room with 4 meters from speaker to the wall will resonate ONLY about 35 Hz. Smaller room - higher resonance. But room resonates ONLY on one frequency according to the distance between wall and speaker.
Side wall makes a kind of comb filter but this is present all of the time and does not change with frequency.
Anyway... I'm not selling anything so any further convincing is out of the question.
@ illusions: it's possible but you can do it your self. Take any VST synth patch that you allready have used, program the cut off filter to make a full sweep with a bit of resonance, export a loop on 24 bit 44,1 kHz and than switch samplerate to 24 bit 48 kHz and export that same loop again. You don't even have to retune synth tuning... samplerate alone makes quite a difference. Make A-B comparison and hear for your self. This takes about 5 minutes... so i really see no point in doing it for you.
You can also export that same loop in 96 kHz just for the reference.... when cut off gets into higher frequencies the difference is quite obvious even for the ordinary - non music production people. I'm sure you'll be able to hear it
ps: try not to use any VST that has internal oversampling (like Blue) or simply turn oversampling off. Otherwise VST synth will process sound in higher samplerate and downsample it back to 44,1. When I think of it... the very fact that some synths have oversampling function also leads to some conclusion unless you believe that such function has no use at all.
  "It occurred to me by intuition, and music was the driving force behind that intuition. My discovery was the result of musical perception"
Albert Einstein, speaking about his theory of relativity |
|
|
UnderTow
Started Topics :
9
Posts :
1448
Posted : Feb 3, 2007 14:45
|
Quote:
|
On 2007-02-03 10:27, shamantrixx wrote:
@ Mike A: room with 4 meters from speaker to the wall will resonate ONLY about 35 Hz.
|
|
Not quite. A 4 meter length will give you axial modes at 43 Hz, 129 Hz, 215 Hz, 301 Hz, 387 Hz etc.
Now if you add width and height (lets say 3 meters and 2.5 meters) you get axial modes at the above frequencies + 57.3 Hz, 68.8 Hz, 86 Hz, 114.6 Hz, 137.6 Hz, 172 Hz, 206.4 Hz, 229.3 Hz, 258 Hz, 275.2 Hz, 286.6 Hz, 344 Hz, 401.3 Hz, 412.8 Hz, 458.6 Hz etc etc etc
Then you have the tangentiel modes at 71.6 Hz, 81.1 Hz, 89.6 Hz, 143.3 Hz, 162.3 Hz, 179.1 Hz, 215 Hz, 243.4 Hz, 268.7 Hz, 286.7 Hz, 324.5 Hz etc etc etc
The you have the oblique modes at 99.3 Hz, 198.7 Hz, 298 Hz, 397.4 Hz etc etc
Quote:
|
Side wall makes a kind of comb filter but this is present all of the time and does not change with frequency.
|
|
That depends of the material of the wall and as no wall has infinite density, it _does_ change with frequency.
Quote:
|
Anyway... I'm not selling anything so any further convincing is out of the question.
|
|
Thank goodness because you are wrong.
Quote:
|
@ illusions: it's possible but you can do it your self. Take any VST synth patch that you allready have used, program the cut off filter to make a full sweep with a bit of resonance, export a loop on 24 bit 44,1 kHz and than switch samplerate to 24 bit 48 kHz and export that same loop again. You don't even have to retune synth tuning...
samplerate alone makes quite a difference. Make A-B comparison and hear for your self. This takes about 5 minutes... so i really see no point in doing it for you.
|
|
No no, post a bit of music and we will see if worrying about the sample rate is justified or not.
Quote:
|
ps: try not to use any VST that has internal oversampling (like Blue) or simply turn oversampling off.
|
|
You make a good point: Use soft synths that sound good at 44.1 Khz.
Quote:
|
Otherwise VST synth will process sound in higher samplerate and downsample it back to 44,1. When I think of it... the very fact that some synths have oversampling function also leads to some conclusion unless you believe that such function has no use at all.
|
|
Actually it is just one way of achieving a particular result. Some coders manage to write non-aliasing engines without oversampling but that takes a bit more knowledge on the part of the coders.
UnderTow |
|
|
UnderTow
Started Topics :
9
Posts :
1448
Posted : Feb 3, 2007 14:49
|
Quote:
|
On 2007-02-02 02:20, shamantrixx wrote:
It's due to the sample rate of your soundcard and the standard equal temperament tuning. Try to switch samplerate to 48kHz and tune down your instruments to 423 Hz instead of 440 Hz. You'll be amazed with the clarity of sound.
From the scientific point of view such problems with bass sounds (and others) are caused by the "rounding" errors during the sampling process in the soundcard. If you have a bass line playing in the key of C (let's say a 130,81 Hz) your soundcard is processing this frequency trough 44100 samples (fixed mathematical points) per second. So since we have a bass line with 130,81 cycles per second and 44100 points per second we get that each bass cycle has to be calculated within 337,13018882348444308539102515098 fixed frames. Obviously soundcard will process this as a 338 samples and next bass line cycle will start in 338th sample and that is like 0,8698111765155569146089748491 samples later. Since Soundcard can't really delay the cycle it will simply ignore this difference and new cycle will not start from zero crossing but will have a missing part or a kind of phase delay if you like.
If you retune the C note to 128 Hz and calculate it within 48000 fixed points you get a clean 375 samples for each cycle. Further on... if you use Phytagorian (or similar non equal) temperament all other notes will be coherent with the note C and you'll have far less rounding errors, phase distortion and most certainly less problems with altering power when altering pitch.
Keep in mind that everything in nature is coherent with whole numbers. All life starts as a single cell and than divides in 2, 4, 8, 16, 32, 64, 128 cells etc. In nature there is no such thing as 337,13018882348444308539102515098. It's 337 or it is 338. Speakers also can not play 337,13 sound frames... they play 337 or 338 cycles. Everything in between is lost, damaged and makes various strange anomalies. Those anomalies when run trough effects, EQ's and other plugs get miscalculated for many times before you finish the track. Less errors in the start - better sound in the end.
|
|
From a scientific point of view, you have just demonstrated that you have absolutely NO IDEA how sampling theory actually works.
UnderTow |
|
|
Mike A
Subra
Started Topics :
185
Posts :
3954
Posted : Feb 3, 2007 18:31
|
Quote:
|
On 2007-02-03 10:27, shamantrixx wrote:
@ Mike A: room with 4 meters from speaker to the wall will resonate ONLY about 35 Hz. Smaller room - higher resonance. But room resonates ONLY on one frequency according to the distance between wall and speaker.
|
|
Tell that to my B notes
|
|
|
UnderTow
Started Topics :
9
Posts :
1448
Posted : Feb 3, 2007 21:22
|
I hadn't read Shamantrixx properly. Upon rereading I see that he is even more wrong than I thought: It isn't the distance between the speakers and the wall that cause room modes (resonance as you call it) but the distance between the walls!
There is nothing wrong with not knowing something but presenting utter bullshit as scientific fact is way out of order.
"Those who assume hypotheses as first principles of their speculations... may indeed form an ingenious romance, but a romance it will still be." -- Roger Cotes, Preface to Sir Isaac Newton's Principia Mathematica, 1713
UnderTow
|
|
|
shamantrixx
Started Topics :
7
Posts :
549
Posted : Feb 5, 2007 19:45
|
@ undertow:
1 - why do you think that your opinion about my music would have any relevance at all? In fact if one remembers your God given right to judge about nearly all non-western cultures and call them PRIMITIVE than it is obvious that your judgment is clouded with your ego, ignorance and false self esteem. Since I'm a member of what you call primitive culture it's reasonable to assume that you'll find it primitive and that I don't make music for hi-tech ignorant people in the first place. Some things can't be bought and some things are impossible to reach even when you use weapons with uranium ammo. However, I don't mind you believing that you are qualified for such judgment so any further discussion is futile until you incarnate at least for few more times in some primitive culture.
2 - In my primitive culture we have a strong belief about Newtonian physic and "modern" science. We believe that it is wrong most of the time. So everything that I've said here is based primarily on my experience and my current understanding of the subject. I assume that I don't know everything and I know that I'll never know everything. So for me the only relevance is experience and only knowledge from personal experience is what counts. You are free to believe what ever you want and that's the only thing that you can do because you have no experience about the subject. Testing of the room resonance takes a microphone and about half an hour but you've never bothered to make one. Obviously in your case it's easier to be ignorant for the entire life and blame the others for it. That way you can be the smartest kid in town without ever really know something from experience. Of course... you can always prove me wrong with recording from the room test with any kind of measurable room resonance above 100 Hz. I assume that I don't know everything so who knows... maybe you'll prove me wrong.
3 - since this is a second time that you act in this advanced - God like manner I really hope that you'll get the picture this time. Since you're so smart it shouldn't be so hard for you.
In few words... I hope that you find your posts interesting and have fun while you write them because I certainly don't give a shit about your point of view from which you promote nazy-like ideology and in the same time pretend to be smart and advanced human being. We all have a right to live but there's no law or weapon in the world that could make me consider you any way near human. Just keep that in mind for future conversation and I'll always be glad to remind you of that fact.
  "It occurred to me by intuition, and music was the driving force behind that intuition. My discovery was the result of musical perception"
Albert Einstein, speaking about his theory of relativity |
|
|
UnderTow
Started Topics :
9
Posts :
1448
Posted : Feb 5, 2007 21:30
|
Quote:
|
On 2007-02-05 19:45, shamantrixx wrote:
@ undertow:
1 - why do you think that your opinion about my music would have any relevance at all?
|
|
It isn't about my opinion of your music. You come here with all sorts of unfounded claims. Back them up with some music I would say.
And it isn't a bout the _music_ it is about the _sound_ of your stuff.
Quote:
|
In fact if one remembers your God given right to judge about nearly all non-western cultures and call them PRIMITIVE
|
|
And most western cultures but you missed that aspect.
Quote:
|
than it is obvious that your judgment is clouded with your ego, ignorance and false self esteem. Since I'm a member of what you call primitive culture it's reasonable to assume that you'll find it primitive and that I don't make music for hi-tech ignorant people in the first place.
|
|
Oh false modesty. It doesn't suite you at all.
Quote:
|
Some things can't be bought and some things are impossible to reach even when you use weapons with uranium ammo. However, I don't mind you believing that you are qualified for such judgment so any further discussion is futile until you incarnate at least for few more times in some primitive culture.
|
|
I won't reincarnate. I don't believe in fairy tales.
Quote:
|
2 - In my primitive culture we have a strong belief about Newtonian physic and "modern" science. We believe that it is wrong most of the time.
|
|
Which proves that your culture is indeed primitive.
Quote:
|
So everything that I've said here is based primarily on my experience and my current understanding of the subject.
|
|
But you didn't say that. You said "From a scientific point of view ..." which is bollocks. Anyway, I thought you didn't believe is science? Or were those just some BS words to give your hubris more weight?
Quote:
|
I assume that I don't know everything and I know that I'll never know everything. So for me the only relevance is experience and only knowledge from personal experience is what counts. You are free to believe what ever you want and that's the only thing that you can do because you have no experience about the subject.
|
|
Let me repeat that quote: "Those who assume hypotheses as first principles of their speculations... may indeed form an ingenious romance, but a romance it will still be."
Quote:
|
Testing of the room resonance takes a microphone and about half an hour but you've never bothered to make one. Obviously in your case it's easier to be ignorant for the entire life and blame the others for it.
|
|
I don't need to take any measurements to know that the frequency of room modes are based on the distance between the walls and not the distance between the speakers and the walls.
Quote:
|
That way you can be the smartest kid in town without ever really know something from experience.
|
|
You are describing yourself. You probably get away with your non-sense talk wherever you come from but when you start posting in places where there are people that do know more than you, your BS shows up for what it is.
Quote:
|
Of course... you can always prove me wrong with recording from the room test with any kind of measurable room resonance above 100 Hz. I assume that I don't know everything so who knows... maybe you'll prove me wrong.
|
|
This is very basic acoustics. Why don't you start by doing the research BEFORE posting rubbish and claiming it to be science?
Quote:
|
3 - since this is a second time that you act in this advanced - God like manner I really hope that you'll get the picture this time. Since you're so smart it shouldn't be so hard for you.
|
|
I only treat bullshiters like this. But you probably won't understand that based on this and other posts from you.
Quote:
|
In few words... I hope that you find your posts interesting and have fun while you write them because I certainly don't give a shit about your point of view from which you promote nazy-like ideology and in the same time pretend to be smart and advanced human being.
|
|
I'm not pretending anything. I'm giving you facts about sound. You can choose to ignore me but that is your loss.
Quote:
|
We all have a right to live but there's no law or weapon in the world that could make me consider you any way near human. Just keep that in mind for future conversation and I'll always be glad to remind you of that fact.
|
|
That isn't fact. That is your twisted view on reality. Let me repeat that quote for you:
"Those who assume hypotheses as first principles of their speculations... may indeed form an ingenious romance, but a romance it will still be."
UnderTow |
|
|
mk47
Inactive User
Started Topics :
118
Posts :
4444
Posted : Feb 5, 2007 22:44
|
another one pwnd by the mighty undertow . lol ... ok . kinda offtopic maby but id like to hear some of ur music undertow . what name do u produce / release under etc ? ..
|
|
|
Adrenal Mode
IsraTrance Junior Member
Started Topics :
11
Posts :
308
Posted : Feb 5, 2007 22:48
|
guys chill out...
shamantrixx, you are right & wrong, your theory isnt realy true but its hold some true in it...
back to the topic, NikC, i think you can solve your bass problem with Basslane from Otiumfx (i'm sure youll know how to use it).
http://www.otiumfx.com/basslane.php
and here is somthing nice (for the ones who need it)
http://www.hometheatershack.com/roomeq/
PEACE & LOVE ! |
|
|
l337
IsraTrance Full Member
Started Topics :
55
Posts :
817
Posted : Feb 5, 2007 22:51
|
@shamantrixx
the normal mode with the lowest eigenfrequency has n=1 and is called the fundamental mode. Its eigenfrequency f1 = 2(c/L) is called the fundamental or first harmonic. The eigenfrequencies with n=2,3,4.... are called overtones.....
ok , so maybe that was uncalled for |
|
|
Meta
Meta/Boomslang
Started Topics :
24
Posts :
1045
Posted : Feb 5, 2007 22:56
|
|
Boobytrip
IsraTrance Junior Member
Started Topics :
39
Posts :
988
Posted : Feb 5, 2007 23:58
|
On 2007-02-03 14:45, UnderTow wrote:
Quote:
|
On 2007-02-03 10:27, shamantrixx wrote:
@ Mike A: room with 4 meters from speaker to the wall will resonate ONLY about 35 Hz.
|
|
Not quite. A 4 meter length will give you axial modes at 43 Hz, 129 Hz, 215 Hz, 301 Hz, 387 Hz etc.
Now if you add width and height (lets say 3 meters and 2.5 meters) you get axial modes at the above frequencies + 57.3 Hz, 68.8 Hz, 86 Hz, 114.6 Hz, 137.6 Hz, 172 Hz, 206.4 Hz, 229.3 Hz, 258 Hz, 275.2 Hz, 286.6 Hz, 344 Hz, 401.3 Hz, 412.8 Hz, 458.6 Hz etc etc etc
Then you have the tangentiel modes at 71.6 Hz, 81.1 Hz, 89.6 Hz, 143.3 Hz, 162.3 Hz, 179.1 Hz, 215 Hz, 243.4 Hz, 268.7 Hz, 286.7 Hz, 324.5 Hz etc etc etc
The you have the oblique modes at 99.3 Hz, 198.7 Hz, 298 Hz, 397.4 Hz etc etc
Quote:
|
Side wall makes a kind of comb filter but this is present all of the time and does not change with frequency.
|
|
Step away from that calculator. I repeat: step away from the calculator !!
|
|
|
illusions
Erebus
Started Topics :
40
Posts :
626
Posted : Feb 6, 2007 06:32
|
Did'nt really want this to become another bashing session which is why I asked for a sample to demonstrate what your talking about.
If it just takes 5 mins, post it up here for everyone to actually hear what your talking about. Im sure Undertow would give it a proper listen too |
|
|
|