Ban Mp3

but everything can be used in the wrong, bad way, like kenji shows us very vivid.
the fact that u even think u are supreme now kenji is disgusting.

On 2003-11-19 00:00, Elysium Project wrote:
I will keep bitching, bitching and bitching about it.... it's my right as an artist and a copyright owner of my music!

And to your knowledge I can easily say YES I am a "real" artist with tons of releases and more than 25 years of experience in making music.... And I had no problems making a ok living (not getting rich) before from my music..... Now if I am lucky I sell 200 copies but still I get tons of e-mails from people that love my music..... strange isen't it?

What do you think of mp3 files ? Have you see it as a way to make your music better known or as a way to pirate music ?

I don't like mp3s... I think the sound is very poor... It is like looking out of your window at a landscape: you get an idea of what is out there, but it is nothing like the real thing! i want to go outside and explore the smells, the feel.... the nooks and crannies. You can't do that with an mp3.
i suppose it does help in some ways to get the music out there.... but i would rather people heard it in the way i intended....either on a big sound system, or at the very least from a full quality CD..... rather than as an audio file with 90 percent of the data removed.

On 2004-01-18 17:51, SuperGlue wrote:
did u ever ask you the question why psychedelic trance is not known as music and not respected by critics and musicians global !!!

(a) Who says psy trance isn't music? And since when has what the critics thought meant something is 'good' or 'bad'. People hated the Velvet Underground in the 60's yet they're possibly the most influential rock n' roll band ever.

ask yourself and u will get answer what is classical and what is psy trance !!!

(a) Answer? These are two more questions!

where Bach musical parts played and where psy music played !!!

(a) Huh? What do you mean?

and music it's not about money who make money from music will never known for years !

(a) Not quite sure what you mean here.

Look at Britney Spears do u see her in next 5 years on stage like Madona from 80' on it !

If you meant what I think you meant by the last statement then you've contradicted yourself here. Madonna is the best selling female artist of all time, and I wouldn't be prepared to write Britney off totally yet.

then why we know Bach coz in these years there are no so many music styles and musicians as today and Bach got main of his music from churches where his music is supposed to be performed so christians perform his parts for many years

(a) Bach is just one example. You could cite any classical composer. OK, Bach composed some of his stuff for the church, but the majority of classical composers did not.

and most of these musicians where unknown at they life only after their death they became wolrd known and electronic equipment the one which brough this music to our house !!! and world fame
to them by that

(a) The works of the classical composers were not bought to fame by the advent of electronic equipment. They were bought to fame by their performance. And many of the classical composers DID acheive fame in their own lifetimes.

totaly out of subject too far from it

(a) Yes, you're absolutely right.

And the comment in my previous post about 'trance orchestras' was not serious, by the way.
It's fairly daft comparing psytrance to the classics musically.