| Author
|
Ban Mp3
|
Evil Doctor Inc
IsraTrance Junior Member
Started Topics :
41
Posts :
549
Posted : Nov 13, 2003 12:22
|
Mp3
unclear
no essense
horrible quality
dirty trade business
No way this scenes going to go anywhere if the mp3 trading and sharing continues
Please help all artists and record companies by buying originals
and
if you dj playin mp3s than please stop there is no way you can rock a crowd with tweeky sound
ban Mp3s
help the scene grow |
|
|
traveller
IsraTrance Senior Member
Started Topics :
234
Posts :
3803
Posted : Nov 13, 2003 12:30
|
and just where should this scene go? i'm quite happy with it the way it is..
 "The dinosaurs became extinct because they didn't have a space program."
- Larry Niven |
|
|
|
Mike A
Subra
Started Topics :
185
Posts :
3954
Posted : Nov 13, 2003 13:34
|
Oh that really sucks, cause I just finished a track and I encoded it on 320kbps quality, and instead of giving the file to my friends I'll just burn it on CD and give to all.
|
|
|
|
Zombi
IsraTrance Senior Member
Started Topics :
375
Posts :
5032
Posted : Nov 13, 2003 15:04
|
Quote:
|
On 2003-11-13 12:22, Evil Doctor Inc wrote:
if you dj playin mp3s than please stop there is no way you can rock a crowd with tweeky sound
|
|
so true!!
Believe your soul ! |
|
|
|
The Madman
Started Topics :
0
Posts :
21
Posted : Nov 13, 2003 17:04
|
Perhaps there is something wrong with your sound cards or computers. It is true that 128 kbps mp3s suck but I can't tell the difference between a 192 kbps mp3 and the original CD track.
However, I do buy CDs because I like to support the artists and some CD covers look just cool, but I don't buy them because of better sound quality. |
|
|
|
wine drinking trancer
Started Topics :
1
Posts :
34
Posted : Nov 13, 2003 17:10
|
|
you might from time to time notice a slight difference between 192kbps mp3 and the cd but for sure there's no audible difference between 256kbps mp3 and the cd.. |
|
|
|
nobody_3
Inactive User
Started Topics :
13
Posts :
1177
Posted : Nov 13, 2003 17:16
|
|
That's not true wine drinking trancer. Mp3's are cut quite heavely in the top and bottom freq. On a big sound system there's a huge difference between CD quality and mp3's. Even at 256kbps.
|
|
|
|
wine drinking trancer
Started Topics :
1
Posts :
34
Posted : Nov 13, 2003 17:28
|
|
how big are we talking? 50 000w? |
|
|
|
nobody_3
Inactive User
Started Topics :
13
Posts :
1177
Posted : Nov 13, 2003 17:30
|
|
No I am talking about a regular sound system at a party. Believe me. There's a huge difference. |
|
|
|
wine drinking trancer
Started Topics :
1
Posts :
34
Posted : Nov 13, 2003 17:34
|
|
granted you do know (at least should) what you are talking about far better than i. but a huge difference? i don't think so.. |
|
|
|
nobody_3
Inactive User
Started Topics :
13
Posts :
1177
Posted : Nov 13, 2003 17:39
|
The problem with mp3's on sound systems at parties is that the sound mostly get "muddy" and at high volume also many times start to distort. That is to me a huge difference from the clear sound on CD's !  But vinyl is for sure the best if you want dynamic soundquality.
|
|
|
|
wine drinking trancer
Started Topics :
1
Posts :
34
Posted : Nov 13, 2003 17:45
|
telling the truth i've never really given a thought to what the music is coming from (cd, lp, laptop) at a party. i'm just always too busy having fun.  |
|
|
|
nobody_3
Inactive User
Started Topics :
13
Posts :
1177
Posted : Nov 13, 2003 17:49
|
and you should
I am mostly talking directly to DJ's who use mp3's when they play. I find it wrong especially since they most of the time get paid when they play. They should be able to buy the music and not download it and they also have a responsability to do a good job - which isen't the case if they use mp3's.
|
|
|
|
DjFucK
Started Topics :
2
Posts :
160
Posted : Nov 14, 2003 01:12
|
.
.
.
mp3...
wow !!!
where the hell do you think most of us get the majority of our music frum...
it's not for my file...
but hey, for the car home system...
or frum me comp...
why the fuck not...
original cd's...
or directly frum the artist i dont care...
goa, and trance was never bout the money...
the music was about living on forever...
timeless...
and if our music reaches someone who appriciates it...
why not i say...
.
.
.
God knows...
thank God...
but i know as well !!!
who am i ??? |
|
|
|
Tranceform
Tranceform
Started Topics :
8
Posts :
78
Posted : Nov 14, 2003 03:04
|
Quote:
|
On 2003-11-14 01:12, DjFucK wrote:
.
.
.
mp3...
wow !!!
where the hell do you think most of us get the majority of our music frum...
it's not for my file...
but hey, for the car home system...
or frum me comp...
why the fuck not...
original cd's...
or directly frum the artist i dont care...
goa, and trance was never bout the money...
the music was about living on forever...
timeless...
and if our music reaches someone who appriciates it...
why not i say...
|
|
This is a pretty usual fallacy among socialists and other kinds of collectivists. The fallacy is that "rule X applies for thing A that is of type Z" therefore "rule X is applicable for thing B since thing B also is of type Z".
To put it simple: "goa, and trance was never bout the money..." is a fallacy, not an argument. There has always been as many different "definitions" of trance as there has been people involved in the scene, therefore there isn't (nor has there ever been) a single truth on the "proper level of commercialism of trance-music"-issue.
Besides, saying that money and artistical values can't be combined isn't true either. A good product that is based on art always needs artistic innovation, therefore these two aspects can't be torn apart - contrary to what is often claimed by socialists who think that getting paid for art isn't right.
Cheers,
Kalle! / Tranceform
____________
http://www.facebook.com/tranceformrecords |
|
|
|
