| Author
|
audio tempo
|
TuK
TuK
Started Topics :
41
Posts :
228
Posted : Aug 5, 2005 17:21
|
the truth is im pretty messy with my work, i got like
50 folders with projects that i dont know where they came from (probobly i made them), and about a trillion of audio stuff witch are scattered in all the folders and a billion cubase projects with
names like : new track, new track1, newtrack, new,
fullon, fullon1,full,progressive,progressive1, new progressive, so i guess i need to clean up a little
thanx alot |
|
|
Limor
Started Topics :
9
Posts :
134
Posted : Aug 29, 2005 17:04
|
you can chage it eny time from 4/4 to 4/5 or what ever even in the middel of the track for a new tempo speed and then it will be some parts on 140/142/145 and all . if u want 1 bpm u must fix it and make it fit by screch it and makes the loops , kik , bass in the new place and on the right tempo.
But ..  im not sure that the quality will be the same .
good luck ! |
|
|
|
Life Style
Life Style
Started Topics :
3
Posts :
31
Posted : Aug 30, 2005 04:17
|
|
Ableton Live its the easier way, i think.... |
|
|
|
MoDu
Started Topics :
0
Posts :
36
Posted : Aug 30, 2005 18:11
|
In terms of organization, i can sugest my way:
I don'te use any samples but the ones I make, usually I sample long pads, intros things I only use once in a track so I can delete the vst and save cpu/mem but ONLY AFTER SAVING a copy of the project before any deleting/sampling in your case bouncing |
|
|
|
mubali
Mubali
Started Topics :
71
Posts :
2219
Posted : Aug 30, 2005 23:18
|
Ableton is definitely the easiest way to without compromising much of your sound quality. I have used it on several remixes of other songs with some success!
 An Eagle may soar, but Weasels don't get sucked into jet engines. |
|
|
|
vox
Started Topics :
2
Posts :
114
Posted : Sep 1, 2005 13:54
|
Quote:
|
On 2005-08-04 20:12, john_c wrote:
no if the song is finished do NOT timestretch.
Export the wave, then load it in a program lke SoundForge and use its Pitch algorithm but lock the key so it only affects tempo. done.
|
|
basically, you just described timestretching. cubase sx2 has a pretty good algorythm for that purpose, so timestretching from 140 to 145 (which is a change of about 3.6%) will not make a significant difference in quality of audio material.
http://myspace.com/voxproject |
|
|
|
vox
Started Topics :
2
Posts :
114
Posted : Sep 1, 2005 13:55
|
Quote:
|
On 2005-08-30 23:18, mubali wrote:
Ableton is definitely the easiest way to without compromising much of your sound quality. I have used it on several remixes of other songs with some success!
|
|
buying ableton just to timestretch a few samples is a bit far-fetched, don't you think?
anyway, if the guy already uses cubase sx2, there is no simpler way than just stretch the audio part.
http://myspace.com/voxproject |
|
|
|
mubali
Mubali
Started Topics :
71
Posts :
2219
Posted : Sep 1, 2005 22:00
|
|
It might be a little far fetched, but Ableton is the best way to timestretch audio without dealing with any nasty artifacts that might come with timestretching in Cubase... Not to mention you might even be able to export audio files using the demo version of ableton.
An Eagle may soar, but Weasels don't get sucked into jet engines. |
|
|
|
