| Author
|
Anarchy and Fuck For Forest Video by TimeWaveZero TV
|
Fria Tantrumm
Started Topics :
5
Posts :
368
Posted : Oct 21, 2009 18:36
|
Yes Login. There are always exceptions to the rule. But when I say public I do not mean a forest or a beach, I mean an area that is populated by people. The moment you throw alot of people into the mix, the chances of spreading or contracting anything increases.
A forest is still relatively private.
Yes, the safety of sex is the business of those having it as long as it's not in a place I could be present in and this is my point exactly. Fucking on the dancefloor is not cool because it DOES BECOME my business.
Considering Moki preached about resonance I feel Trancevisual has a right to call her whatever he wants because she is getting personal. I mean if you call someone who is in direct conversation with you "A fucked up dude" what do you expect?? Everyone does not practice a turn the other cheek philosophy.  **************************************
Fractal Cowboys : Post Singularity COMING SOON :)
Orestis : Recursice Consciousness OUT
Psykovsky: Na Ve Ka is OUT! |
|
|
|
TranceVisuals
TranceVisuals
Started Topics :
23
Posts :
743
Posted : Oct 21, 2009 18:42
|
Quote:
|
On 2009-10-21 18:33, TimeTraveller wrote:
Trance Visuals - your statements are like from a Nazi,like Adolf Hitler from Uk.
Some of yours are funny I agree ,but you absolutely suck whit your psychopathical statments .
Never talk so to anybody biatch.You have the less clue of respect here.
Make fascist visuals that is better for your sense of humour you wanna b extraoridnaryan.
|
|
That is probably the most extreme example of Godwin's law/theory in action.
Whey hey, another seeming internet peon!
Well done, I've added you just there below MOKI on the "shit list", so you don't feel left out.
www.youtube.com/trancevisuals
2,000,000+ views and counting. |
|
|
|
TranceVisuals
TranceVisuals
Started Topics :
23
Posts :
743
Posted : Oct 21, 2009 18:43
|
Quote:
|
On 2009-10-21 18:33, Aluxe wrote:
It doesn’t take a genius to see that you are projecting your own ego and short comings on Moki.
|
|
You right, it doesn't.
Just a complete and utter moron like YOU to get it wrong! 
P.s. You can make it a menage a trois with Moki and TimeTraveller if you like, my mental pen is waiting just to add you on the list.
www.youtube.com/trancevisuals
2,000,000+ views and counting. |
|
|
|
Axis Mundi
Axis Mundi
Started Topics :
75
Posts :
1848
Posted : Oct 21, 2009 18:50
|
Login's point is a good one... while it's true that a forest area for example could be described as "public", if I came across someone in the middle of the woods having sex, I would understand that it's obvious they were out there seeking privacy for themselves and would do my best to respectfully leave them undisturbed.
Having sex in outright conspicuous places such as on top of your car at a drive-in movie in the first row or the middle of the dancefloor is obviously showing little respect for those around them and thus have earned no respect from me.
And yes, while Trancevisuals' remark was very imflammatory, Moki has posts written all over the forums displaying general disdain and contempt for both individuals and the community she takes part in as a whole for a long time now. Not exactly respect-earning behavior. The difference is, in her case it's so commonplace that the community has grown to expect it from her and thus it seems to go unnoticed by most. The fact that she mentions resonance and "not vibrating on that level" I found to be particularly ironic, however. Quite frankly it's no wonder why people grow increasingly hostile with her the more they deal with her. While reciprocating hostility may not be the best answer, what goes around, comes around.
|
|
|
|
Nectarios
Martian Arts
Started Topics :
187
Posts :
5292
Posted : Oct 21, 2009 18:52
|
Anybody who fucks in the middle of the dancefloor should get a kick in the cunt/bollocks. Get a tent/room/bush and do your thing for fucks sake!
http://soundcloud.com/martianarts |
|
|
|
TimeTraveller
IsraTrance Full Member
Started Topics :
80
Posts :
3207
Posted : Oct 21, 2009 19:03
|
|
Login
IsraTrance Full Member
Started Topics :
65
Posts :
1707
Posted : Oct 21, 2009 19:04
|
I am now sure this forum has been infiltrated by extreme right.
Where is your hedonism?
Where is your desire for broking stupid social norms based on banal morality?
Where is the pursue of pushing limits forwards?
Would you really be offended if you se people fucking on the dancefloor?
Don’t you think it will be beautiful (if AIDS and ETS didn’t exist) that raves could be also massive orgies?
Expell the false Idols from this scene!!!!
BRING BACK DIONYSUS !!!!! We need more fun and pleasure!!!!
This world needs it.
"The dedication to repetition — the search for nirvana in a single held tone or an endlessly cycling rhythm — is one of electronic music's noblest gestures." |
|
|
|
TranceVisuals
TranceVisuals
Started Topics :
23
Posts :
743
Posted : Oct 21, 2009 19:05
|
Quote:
|
On 2009-10-21 19:03, TimeTraveller wrote:
Fascist Visuals - you are a pathetic clown.
|
|
Better a clown who knows it, than an idiot who doesn't, like you....
Btw i've an infinite bag of shit, so I am happy to fling shit as long as you are... www.youtube.com/trancevisuals
2,000,000+ views and counting. |
|
|
|
TimeTraveller
IsraTrance Full Member
Started Topics :
80
Posts :
3207
Posted : Oct 21, 2009 19:05
|
|
TranceVisuals
TranceVisuals
Started Topics :
23
Posts :
743
Posted : Oct 21, 2009 19:08
|
Quote:
|
On 2009-10-21 19:05, TimeTraveller wrote:
only an idiot is sure to know. End of your time in mine.
|
|
Yawn, I thought you were going to actually have a "comeback" there, something witty, erudite, perhaps even poignant....
But no, sadly you have seemingy only inferior grade shit, whilst mine is organic pure shit from kali's arse after shiva's given her a good seeing to anally.
www.youtube.com/trancevisuals
2,000,000+ views and counting. |
|
|
|
Axis Mundi
Axis Mundi
Started Topics :
75
Posts :
1848
Posted : Oct 21, 2009 19:42
|
|
Fria Tantrumm
Started Topics :
5
Posts :
368
Posted : Oct 21, 2009 19:55
|
Quote:
|
On 2009-10-21 19:04, Login wrote:
I am now sure this forum has been infiltrated by extreme right.
Where is your hedonism?
Where is your desire for broking stupid social norms based on banal morality?
Where is the pursue of pushing limits forwards?
Would you really be offended if you se people fucking on the dancefloor?
Don’t you think it will be beautiful (if AIDS and ETS didn’t exist) that raves could be also massive orgies?
Expell the false Idols from this scene!!!!
BRING BACK DIONYSUS !!!!! We need more fun and pleasure!!!!
This world needs it.
|
|
No One is denying you your hedonism...do it on your own time in your own space.
The world does not need more random, casual sex but a more holistic approach towards sexuality. Holistic doesn't mean having the license to fuck anywhere and anytime.
If you want an orgy like environment, go to an orgy, no one is stopping you, but to force an orgy onto someone who doesn't wish it, that's not very fair is it??
This world doesn't need more fun and pleasure...that is precisely what fucked the world in the first place..a hedonistic attitude with disregard for it's consequence is what screwed things up, for in our pursuit of constant gratification of our senses we have disregarded this planet and the animals.
**************************************
Fractal Cowboys : Post Singularity COMING SOON :)
Orestis : Recursice Consciousness OUT
Psykovsky: Na Ve Ka is OUT! |
|
|
|
Pavel
Troll
Started Topics :
313
Posts :
8649
Posted : Oct 21, 2009 20:30
|
|
Aluxe
IsraTrance Junior Member
Started Topics :
25
Posts :
725
Posted : Oct 21, 2009 22:52
|
Quote:
| Axis mundi wrote:
Whether or not FFF fucks in the marketplace or not, they obviously think it's a good idea, and there are quite a few people here in this discussion advocating fucking in public places (which include marketplaces and street corners).
|
|
It doesn’t have to be in the market place or street corners if this doesn’t make sense. It’s like you can’t play soccer in the street because you will disturb the traffic or at a resturant either. But at the park maybe it’s an appropiate place. And we could create similar regulations for sex so it’s done responsibly. But if somebody wants to have sex in their front lawn exposed to people passing by they should be able to just like they are able to play music at a resonable volume and have a barbecue with smoke coming out at their lawn. Maybe if people would want to have sex in a public park there would be a set of regulations to follow so it’s done right like requiring a sex mat/cloth under so that all fluids don’t pollute. Things like that. If done correctly there is no reason why sex needs to be banned from ALL PUBLIC places. Or is there?
Quote:
| Fria wrote:
Uxmal might boast many a phallic sculpture but that is not an indication of PUBLIC sex...it's usually a symbol of strength, virility, fertility, prosperity. India's Khajurao is entirely covered in extremely sexual sculptures, but that had nothing to do with sex in public being accepted.
|
|
Maybe it’s not an indication of public sex but it is surely an indication that they are much more comfortable with sexual representations out in public and tells a lot. And just because sex in public may not have been customary in these societies it does not mean that it was prohibited which is what I am against here. Because as long as the sanitary regulations are set into place it should then be up for each person to decide for themselves weather they like sex in public or in private, because in the end it may be a matter of preference and personal beliefs.
And there are other examples apart from the Maya. I mentioned the Huastecs who apparently had a phalic cult and who shocked the spaniards because of how liberal and free they were in regards to sex. And the same thing goes for the cultures of Peru, there are many examples there about sex in public. There were even ritual orgys and many other open sex rituals that lasted for several days. Its no wonder why the Moche culture depcited the sexual act in all types of ceramic bowls such as this one:
http://media.photobucket.com/image/moche%20sex/holagringo5/7a2def2d.jpg
But REGARDLESS we should not go by the standards of ancient cultures because they also had things like gender inequality. So if we do not accept this today why should we accept other moral values simply because they were common in the past?
Quote:
| Fria wrote:
2. I am secular, but do not appreciate not having a choice in what is put in front of my face minus any warning. As I said, If i knew that in a certain place public sexual activity is allowed to take place, then i can CHOOSE not to go there. But if I am not given the choice, that in itself is not a secular point of view. I don't think it's right for FFF to foist their public exploits onto MY SENSES without asking me if it's OK..given the fact that they understand that sex is touchy.
|
|
Yeah it’s touchy to you but it doesn’t mean it’s touchy for everyone. It’s like forcing all the women in the world to cover their face because it offends muslim people who practice the hijab. Or would that make sense to you?
|
|
|
|
Fria Tantrumm
Started Topics :
5
Posts :
368
Posted : Oct 21, 2009 23:09
|
@ Aluxe..once again..comparing freedom of sex, to freedom of facial exposure is just not the same thing.
Sex is an act of procreation or pleasure, but has it's biological roots in the concept of procreation, it is an act that is required for a particular consequence and thus is not the same as hijab. I hope you see the difference. Secondly, covering one's face is just extremely inconvenient and unfair if it is based on gender and thus has it's roots in INEQUALITY.
Whereas no public sex applies to all regardless and thus is not unequal in a sense... Yes it is unequal to you maybe because you want to afford people the right to do as they wish, but then that should apply to everything. Would you be accepting of public displays of child abuse?? Even if the child is a willing participant (Maybe coming from a poor family and is willing to take a lashing and a kicking in return for food)?? Would you be accepting of paedophilia if the child is a willing participant? Would you be accepting of public displays of intense physical torture if both parties are willing participants and get turned on by torturing each other. I mean imagine two people cutting up each other at a trance party because they get "turned on"!!! Based on your theory, the world could become a chaotic and deviant place.
Thus sex on one's garden is again completely different from a barbeque in one's garden. Why do you insist on very loose analogies??
If Muslim people require hijab they are free to exert that requirement in their own countries, also a designated area. If FFF wants to fuck in public, let them do it in a designated area, no one is taking that away from them.
**************************************
Fractal Cowboys : Post Singularity COMING SOON :)
Orestis : Recursice Consciousness OUT
Psykovsky: Na Ve Ka is OUT! |
|
|
|
