| Author
|
after effects
|
Surrender
IsraTrance Team
Started Topics :
506
Posts :
5388
Posted : Nov 13, 2004 06:33
|
which do you prefer and which do u think is a better idea:
to do some finishing touches (not L2) on soundforge/wavelab or everything in the sequencer.
i was playing around with some things in soundforge and found it very easy for some effects to just do on the whole wav instead of exporting pieces in cubase and applying it there.
  "On the other hand, you have different fingers."
http://myspace.com/gadimon |
|
|
|
Anak
Anakoluth
Started Topics :
108
Posts :
2395
Posted : Nov 13, 2004 11:00
|
|
EYB
Noized
Started Topics :
111
Posts :
2849
Posted : Nov 13, 2004 15:38
|
yeah matter of taste, just the result counts 
Signature |
|
|
|
Morax
Triac
Started Topics :
10
Posts :
348
Posted : Nov 15, 2004 00:58
|
i think its better on the soundforge, because you
can see the problems that you have in the mix,
if theres any...
and when you see the wav you know exactly how
much you need to compress and limit.
of course it depends on your ears... but still
its better when you know what you are doing |
|
|
|
Elad
Tsabeat/Sattel Battle
Started Topics :
158
Posts :
5306
Posted : Nov 15, 2004 14:54
|
|
Mike A
Subra
Started Topics :
185
Posts :
3954
Posted : Nov 15, 2004 21:36
|
I never touch the mixdown. I make it all in the sequencer.
I use sound forge only to see the waveform, but then apply whatever needs applying in the seq.
|
|
|
|
Colin OOOD
Moderator
Started Topics :
95
Posts :
5380
Posted : Nov 15, 2004 22:40
|
|
