| Author
|
a query...bout reason..
|
djsid
Aghori Tantrik
Started Topics :
85
Posts :
651
Posted : Nov 18, 2003 17:22
|
ok..heres the my question
suppose i make the song on a normal 24bit sound with no hifi stuff at home..sounds cool
now i go to a studio and load my reason file and record to adat or protools from there..
will my output be as good as my home production or studio production..
im sure it will correspond to the studio computer's card..but i want to be sure..
so plz tell me if u kno!
bom!
  aGh0Ri TanTriK
Sonic Tantra Records
http://www.sonictantra.com
http://agh0ritantrik.weebly.com
http://www.soundclick.com/aghoritantrik |
|
|
|
WAVELOGIX
Wavelogix
Started Topics :
136
Posts :
1214
Posted : Nov 19, 2003 10:51
|
sid dude ,
here u go ...
i have already tried wat u mean to say at my studio and will now tell u wat really happens ...
when u make ur track in reason on some shittiy soundblaster card and program renders the trk to .wav takin into consideration both its algorithms and the soundcard hardware ofcourse as well .
so the first time u make ur track on reason and then export as a .wav file or even individual tracks [as i did in fruity ] , and then later load it onto pro tools , the difference wil be around 15-20% .. thts it.
so the bottom line is to always do the first conversion with the highest resolution possible.
IMO pro tools le and tdm will also make some difference . so i hope u got what i meant to say ...
bye 4 now 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CTPJuMSwzUQ |
|
|
|
Shanti Alien
Vectro Electro
Started Topics :
65
Posts :
1056
Posted : Nov 19, 2003 16:24
|
|
Mike A
Subra
Started Topics :
185
Posts :
3954
Posted : Nov 19, 2003 16:31
|
Exporting has nothing to do with your hardware. It's based on algorithms from inside the software, and not your sound card.
I you want to play the track at a party, you gotta make it 16/44.1 so your CDJ can read it
|
|
|
|
djsid
Aghori Tantrik
Started Topics :
85
Posts :
651
Posted : Nov 19, 2003 17:19
|
|
Mike A
Subra
Started Topics :
185
Posts :
3954
Posted : Nov 19, 2003 17:23
|
There shouldn't be any difference at all.
If you render it at the same quality, if will sound exactly the same.
And as far as I know, you can render all qualities. The question if you can play them afterwards 
|
|
|
|
Shanti Alien
Vectro Electro
Started Topics :
65
Posts :
1056
Posted : Nov 19, 2003 22:20
|
|
FluoSamsara (Oxygen)
IsraTrance Full Member
Started Topics :
84
Posts :
1164
Posted : Nov 20, 2003 02:21
|
When a music is exported, I don't think it would make a diference with the sound card...As mike said, its the software (and computer processor) that take care of tranforming the music being played into algorithms (computer language)
If you keep it with 24bit it should sound the same at a studio...well prety sure...hmmm 
|
|
|
|
Pavel
Troll
Started Topics :
313
Posts :
8649
Posted : Nov 20, 2003 20:21
|
As Mikey said there's no difference if you have RME card or some shitty on board chip. The software algorythms are the ones that decide the quality of the audio.
BTW the first Cosma album was concieved on SB Live.
Everyone in the world is doing something without me |
|
|
|
billy ambulance
IsraTrance Junior Member
Started Topics :
43
Posts :
560
Posted : Nov 20, 2003 20:32
|
|
you can take your files and play them in a pro studio thru mixer, compressor & eq and than record them to a computer. A real live analog export!
check out! www.soundclick.com/spasm |
|
|
|
AtOm
Started Topics :
5
Posts :
22
Posted : Nov 21, 2003 16:34
|
[quote]
BTW the first Cosma album was concieved on SB Live.
True...Simplicity was well crafted with the VSTi's & the SB live in 2001...
|
|
|
|
WAVELOGIX
Wavelogix
Started Topics :
136
Posts :
1214
Posted : Dec 8, 2003 22:20
|
so if u ppl saying that its the softwares algorithms that r deciding the final quailty
why is it that when i render a track in reason / fl studio using offline rendering , it dosent sound as good as infected 's or yahels tracks ??
after all sound card has some role to play right ??
if the algorightms are going to b responsible for the quality , then y do ppl buy expensive soundcards ??? other than for issues like latency ...
pls hlp me out wid this |
|
|
|
llazi
IsraTrance Junior Member
Started Topics :
10
Posts :
28
Posted : Dec 8, 2003 23:00
|
Look, i'm IT pro and i can tell you how the pc part goes.
Now when you ask Reson to save a .wav or whatever file for you, the whole process will not need the soundcard at all. It is just calculations on the modifications that you have done in this programm. It has already a stucture, just some values are changed.
The soundcard instead is build to let us hear sounds from the pc. It's not a samler/effect or whatever. It's just a chip for our ears not for the pc.
Everyone buys expensive soundcard because of it's latency, which by it's definition, is the time than passes between a input of the user and the sound that we percept/hear.
I hope i've been clear enough.
Peace |
|
|
|
guanche
Started Topics :
8
Posts :
26
Posted : Dec 9, 2003 13:38
|
|
