| Author
|
A few questions about reviews
|
kazuku
IsraTrance Full Member
Started Topics :
100
Posts :
1123
Posted : May 27, 2010 11:32:07
|
Hey Isratrancers 
I would like to hear a few thoughts on what review formats people prefer so I can use it to make future reviews I write more informative and interesting.
Do you prefer a score or do you think opinions and comments are enough? I can see how a score is a good conclusion to the review, but sometimes it becomes very difficult to rate music like this - similar to comparing apples and oranges 
If you would like to see a score given, what kind of scoring system do you think is most resonable? Out of 10? 5? 100? A-F?
How about the format? Do you prefer to have an overview or a track by track approach?
Please share your ideas and feelings on this.
|
|
|
psysnoopy
Started Topics :
5
Posts :
1331
Posted : May 27, 2010 16:18
|
I usually check this section (specially when I wanna buy some CDs) but I have never read the full review track by track, it's soooo boring and extra impossible for me 
So I read the last lines/conclusion of the main review + check the posts by other people + check the score of the tracks.
I think what we use at the moment for scoring (out of 10) is good.
|
|
|
|
a3k
IsraTrance Team
Started Topics :
269
Posts :
7826
Posted : May 27, 2010 19:30
|
one thing i do is to check the user who says he likes it - i find several users with good tastes, and some similar to mines and so i trust their judgment (most of the times  )
 ... |
|
|
|
